Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Past papers/ Taxation/ July 2021
Paper 13 Qs
Revision Test Paper (RTP) · July 2021

CA Inter Taxation

This page contains all 13 questions from the CA Inter Taxation Revision Test Paper (RTP) for the July 2021 attempt cycle, sourced from VSI Jaipur.

13 worked solutions ready
Sign up free to unlock every solution + bare-Act citations + how-to-write skeletons. 30 seconds, no card, no spam. Already signed up? Log in.
🎯 Practice this paper now

Drill 5 questions from this paper — instant grading

Real ICAI questions, instantly graded with bare-Act citations. ~5 minutes. No signup.

Drill 5 questions →
Q.1 00 marks easy Economic Order Quantity, inventory management, stock levels ⚡ Try this Q →
A Ltd. produces a product 'X' using a raw material 'D'. To produce one unit of X, 4 kg of D is required. As per the sales forecast conducted by the company, it will be able to sale 20,000 units of X in the coming year. The following are the information related to the raw material D: (i) The Re-order quantity is 400 kg. less than the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ). (ii) Maximum consumption per day is 40 kg. more than the average consumption per day. (iii) There is an opening stock of 2,000 kg. (iv) Time required to get the raw materials from the suppliers is 4 to 8 days. (v) The purchase price is ₹ 250 per kg. There is an opening stock of 1,800 units of the finished product X. The carrying cost of inventory is 14% p.a. To place an order company has to incur ₹ 1,340 on paper and documentation work. From the above information FIND OUT the followings in relation to raw material D:
CTTP

Worked Solution

✓ Verified

Step 1 – Determine Annual Requirement of Raw Material D

Production required for the year = Sales – Opening stock of finished goods = 20,000 – 1,800 = 18,200 units of X.

Annual consumption of D = 18,200 × 4 kg = 72,800 kg.

Step 2 – Daily Consumption Rates

Assuming 364 working days (52 weeks): Average daily consumption = 72,800 ÷ 364 = 200 kg/day. Maximum daily consumption = 200 + 40 = 240 kg/day. Minimum daily consumption (assumed symmetric) = 200 – 40 = 160 kg/day. Lead time: Minimum = 4 days, Maximum = 8 days, Average = 6 days.

Step 3 – Carrying Cost per kg per year = 14% × ₹250 = ₹35 per kg per year.

Step 4 – Economic Order Quantity (EOQ)

EOQ = √(2 × Annual Demand × Ordering Cost ÷ Carrying Cost per unit)
= √(2 × 72,800 × 1,340 ÷ 35) = √5,574,400 ≈ 2,361 kg.

(a) Re-order Quantity (ROQ)

ROQ = EOQ – 400 = 2,361 – 400 = 1,961 kg.

Re-order Level (required for parts b and c) = Maximum consumption × Maximum lead time = 240 × 8 = 1,920 kg.

(b) Maximum Stock Level

Maximum Stock Level = Re-order Level + Re-order Quantity – (Minimum consumption × Minimum lead time)
= 1,920 + 1,961 – (160 × 4) = 1,920 + 1,961 – 640 = 3,241 kg.

(c) Minimum Stock Level

Minimum Stock Level = Re-order Level – (Average consumption × Average lead time)
= 1,920 – (200 × 6) = 1,920 – 1,200 = 720 kg.

(d) Impact on Profitability by Not Ordering EOQ

Ordering ROQ (1,961 kg) instead of EOQ (2,361 kg) results in a higher total inventory cost. The difference represents the reduction in profitability of approximately ₹1,428 per annum. The company incurs excess ordering costs (more frequent orders due to smaller lot size) that outweigh the savings in carrying costs — net adverse impact ≈ ₹1,428.

PLAN

Write it like this

Time target 14 min 24 sec

1The skeleton

- Nail the annual requirement first — subtract opening finished goods stock (1,800 units) from sales (20,000) to get production, THEN multiply by 4 kg; examiners give a dedicated step mark here and skipping it loses you the foundation.
- Derive all consumption rates in one block — state average, maximum, and minimum daily consumption together with lead time min/max/average before touching any formula; examiners reward systematic data organisation and it prevents carry-forward errors.
- Write the EOQ formula symbolically before plugging numbers — √(2 × A × O / C) on its own line, THEN substitute; this earns method marks even if your arithmetic slips.
- Always state ROL before Max/Min Stock — Re-order Level = Max consumption × Max lead time is the anchor formula; Max and Min Stock formulas both reference ROL, so present it as a named interim result, not buried inside a bigger calc.
- For part (d), build a cost comparison table — compute Total Cost at EOQ and Total Cost at ROQ side by side (ordering cost + carrying cost each), then state the difference as 'reduction in profitability of ₹___'; a narrative-only answer without numbers gets zero here.
- Label every answer with units (kg) — examiner checklists tick unit alongside value; writing just '720' instead of '720 kg' is a silent half-mark leak across all four parts.

2Examiner-rewarded phrases

“Re-order Level = Maximum consumption per day × Maximum lead time”“EOQ = √(2 × Annual Demand × Ordering Cost per order / Carrying Cost per unit per annum)”“Maximum Stock Level = Re-order Level + Re-order Quantity – (Minimum consumption per day × Minimum lead time)”

3Common trap

Don't fall for this

Heads up — almost everyone uses 20,000 units directly as the production figure and skips deducting the 1,800-unit opening stock of finished goods, which inflates annual raw material requirement to 80,000 kg instead of 72,800 kg; every subsequent answer (EOQ, ROQ, stock levels) then carries that error and you bleed marks across all four parts from one missed line.

🎯 Practice more Economic Order Quantity, inventory management, s questions →
Q.2 00 marks easy Wage payment systems, Halsey scheme, Rowan scheme, bonus cal ⚡ Try this Q →
JBL Sisters operates a boutique which works for various fashion houses and retail stores. It has employed 26 workers and pays them on time rate basis. On an average an employee is allowed 8 hours for boutique work on a piece of garment. In the month of December 2020, two workers M and J were given 15 pieces and 21 pieces of garments respectively for boutique work. The following are the details of their work: M - Work assigned 15 pcs., Time taken 100 hours; J - Work assigned 21 pcs., Time taken 140 hours. Workers are paid bonus as per Halsey System. The existing rate of wages is ₹ 60 per hour. As per the new wages agreement the workers will be paid ₹ 72 per hour w.e.f. 1st January 2021. At the end of the month December 2020, the accountant of the company has wrongly calculated wages to these two workers taking ₹ 72 per hour.
CTTP

Worked Solution

✓ Verified

Given Data: Standard time = 8 hours per piece. Worker M: 15 pieces assigned, 100 hours taken. Worker J: 21 pieces assigned, 140 hours taken. Existing rate: ₹60/hr; New rate (Jan 2021): ₹72/hr. Accountant wrongly applied ₹72/hr for December 2020.

Standard Time: M = 15 × 8 = 120 hrs; J = 21 × 8 = 168 hrs.
Time Saved: M = 120 − 100 = 20 hrs; J = 168 − 140 = 28 hrs.

(i) Loss due to incorrect rate — Halsey Scheme

Under Halsey Scheme, Bonus = 50% × Time Saved × Rate/hr.

At correct rate (₹60): M = (100×60) + (0.5×20×60) = 6,000 + 600 = ₹6,600; J = (140×60) + (0.5×28×60) = 8,400 + 840 = ₹9,240. Total = ₹15,840.

At wrong rate (₹72): M = (100×72) + (0.5×20×72) = 7,200 + 720 = ₹7,920; J = (140×72) + (0.5×28×72) = 10,080 + 1,008 = ₹11,088. Total = ₹19,008.

Loss due to incorrect rate (Halsey) = ₹19,008 − ₹15,840 = ₹3,168

(ii) Loss due to incorrect rate — Rowan Scheme

Under Rowan Scheme, Bonus = (Time Saved ÷ Standard Time) × Time Taken × Rate/hr.

At correct rate (₹60): M = (100×60) + (20/120×100×60) = 6,000 + 1,000 = ₹7,000; J = (140×60) + (28/168×140×60) = 8,400 + 1,400 = ₹9,800. Total = ₹16,800.

At wrong rate (₹72): M = (100×72) + (20/120×100×72) = 7,200 + 1,200 = ₹8,400; J = (140×72) + (28/168×140×72) = 10,080 + 1,680 = ₹11,760. Total = ₹20,160.

Loss due to incorrect rate (Rowan) = ₹20,160 − ₹16,800 = ₹3,360

(iii) Loss/Savings if Rowan Scheme had been followed (compared to Halsey at correct rates)

Wages under Halsey (correct, ₹60) = ₹15,840; Wages under Rowan (correct, ₹60) = ₹16,800.

Additional cost under Rowan = ₹16,800 − ₹15,840 = ₹960 (Loss to employer)

(iv) Suitability of Rowan Scheme for JBL Sisters

The Rowan scheme is particularly suitable for JBL Sisters for the following reasons:

1. Quality protection: The Rowan bonus is calculated as a proportion of time taken, not just time saved. This means the bonus rate itself increases up to a point but then becomes self-limiting. Workers are discouraged from rushing excessively to save time at the cost of quality — critical in boutique garment work where precision is paramount.

2. Higher incentive for moderate efficiency: Both M and J saved exactly 16.67% of standard time. At this savings level, Rowan gives higher bonus (₹1,000 and ₹1,400) compared to Halsey (₹600 and ₹840), incentivising workers without penalising them for slower, quality-focused work.

3. Built-in ceiling: Under Rowan, a worker can never earn more than double the time wages (bonus cannot exceed 100% of time wages), which protects the employer from excessively high payouts.

4. Balanced interests: Since boutique fashion work demands accuracy and finishing quality, the Rowan scheme balances worker motivation with employer cost control, making it more appropriate than Halsey for skilled craft-based work.

PLAN

Write it like this

Time target 14 min 24 sec

1The skeleton

- Lay out a 'Given' block first — write Standard Time (8 hrs × pieces), Actual Time, and Rate in 3 clean lines before touching any formula; examiners tick off data recognition as a separate step and it shows you haven't jumped in blind.
- State the formula in words before plugging numbers — write 'Halsey Bonus = 50% × Time Saved × Rate' and 'Rowan Bonus = (Time Saved ÷ Standard Time) × Actual Time × Rate' as standalone lines; this alone gets you formula marks even if your arithmetic slips.
- Calculate correct-rate wages and wrong-rate wages separately, then subtract — do NOT just say '₹3,168 loss'; show the two totals (₹15,840 vs ₹19,008) because the examiner is awarding 1 mark per worker per scheme, and the final difference is the last mark.
- Repeat the same structure for Rowan — mirror your Halsey layout exactly; identical structure signals method clarity to the checker and cuts your own risk of formula-switching errors mid-calculation.
- For the suitability part, open with 'Rowan scheme is more suitable because…' and give exactly 2 reasons — quality protection (bonus is self-limiting, workers can't rush carelessly) and higher bonus at moderate efficiency; these are the two points ICAI's suggested answer rewards, so don't invent a third.

2Examiner-rewarded phrases

“Under Halsey Scheme, bonus = 50% of time saved × rate per hour”“Under Rowan Scheme, bonus = (Time Saved / Standard Time) × Actual Time × Rate per hour”“Rowan scheme is more suitable where quality of work is of prime importance as it discourages workers from rushing”

3Common trap

Don't fall for this

Heads up — the single biggest killer here is using Standard Time as the base for time wages instead of Actual Time. Your time wages are always Actual Hours × Rate; Standard Time only enters the formula as the denominator inside the Rowan bonus fraction. If you write 120 × 60 for M's time wages instead of 100 × 60, your entire answer unravels and you lose marks on every sub-part.

🎯 Practice more Wage payment systems, Halsey scheme, Rowan schem questions →
Q.3 00 marks easy Machine hour rate, absorption costing, overhead allocation ⚡ Try this Q →
A manufacturing unit has purchased and installed a new machine at a cost of ₹ 24,90,000 to its fleet of 5 existing machines. The new machine has an estimated life of 12 years and is expected to realise ₹ 90,000 as scrap value at the end of its working life. Other relevant data are as follows: (i) Budgeted working hours are 2,496 based on 8 hours per day for 312 days. Plant maintenance work is carried out on weekends when production is totally halted. The estimated maintenance hours are 416. During the production hours machine set-up and change over works are carried out. During the set-up hours no production is done. A total 312 hours are required for machine set-ups and change overs. (ii) An estimated cost of maintenance of the machine is ₹ 2,40,000 p.a. (iii) The machine requires a component to be replaced every week at a cost of ₹ 2,400. (iv) There are three operators to control the operations of all the 6 machines. Each operator is paid ₹ 30,000 per month plus 20% fringe benefits. (v) Electricity: During the production hours including set-up hours, the machine consumes 60 units per hour. During the maintenance the machine consumes only 10 units per hour. Rate of electricity per unit of consumption is ₹ 6. (vi) Departmental and general works overhead allocated to the operation during last year was ₹ 5,00,000. During the current year it is estimated to increase by 10%. Required: COMPUTE the machine hour rate.
CTTP

Worked Solution

✓ Verified

Machine Hour Rate (MHR) Computation for New Machine

Machine Hour Rate is the cost of running a machine per hour of effective productive use. It is computed by dividing the total annual machine-related costs by the effective machine hours (productive hours excluding idle/set-up time).

Step 1 – Effective Machine Hours (Denominator)

Budgeted working hours = 2,496 hours. Of these, 312 hours are set-up/changeover hours during which no production occurs. Effective machine hours = 2,496 – 312 = 2,184 hours. Maintenance hours (416) are separately accounted for in electricity cost but are not included in the denominator since no production occurs then.

Step 2 – Depreciation

Depreciable cost = ₹24,90,000 – ₹90,000 (scrap) = ₹24,00,000. Annual depreciation = ₹24,00,000 ÷ 12 years = ₹2,00,000.

Step 3 – Maintenance Cost

Given directly = ₹2,40,000 p.a.

Step 4 – Component Replacement

312 working days ÷ 6 days per week = 52 weeks. Replacement cost = 52 × ₹2,400 = ₹1,24,800.

Step 5 – Labour (Operators)

3 operators × ₹30,000 × 120% fringe × 12 months = ₹12,96,000 for all 6 machines. Share for new machine = ₹12,96,000 ÷ 6 = ₹2,16,000.

Step 6 – Electricity Cost

During production hours (including set-up): 2,496 hrs × 60 units × ₹6 = ₹8,98,560. During maintenance: 416 hrs × 10 units × ₹6 = ₹24,960. Total electricity = ₹9,23,520.

Step 7 – Departmental & General Overhead

Current year overhead = ₹5,00,000 × 110% = ₹5,50,000 for all 6 machines. Share for new machine = ₹5,50,000 ÷ 6 = ₹91,667 (rounded).

Total Annual Cost = ₹17,95,987

Machine Hour Rate = ₹17,95,987 ÷ 2,184 effective hours = ₹822.34 per machine hour

PLAN

Write it like this

Time target 28 min 48 sec

1The skeleton

- Lead with the denominator first — write 'Effective Machine Hours = 2,496 – 312 = 2,184 hrs' at the very top before any cost line; examiners check this number first and it signals you know what MHR actually means.
- Split electricity into two rows explicitly — production hours (2,496 × 60 × ₹6) and maintenance hours (416 × 10 × ₹6) separately; collapsing them into one line is a silent mark-killer because the examiner can't verify your logic.
- Flag the 1/6 share every time you divide a shared cost — write '÷ 6 machines' in brackets next to labour and overhead; without that bracket, the examiner doesn't know if you divided correctly or guessed.
- Present a clean two-column summary table — left column: cost head, right column: ₹ amount; then one final line 'MHR = Total ÷ 2,184 = ₹___'; this is the format ICAI's own suggested answers use and it earns full presentation marks.
- Show weeks-to-days working for component replacement — write '312 days ÷ 6 days/week = 52 weeks × ₹2,400' on its own line; skipping this step looks like you assumed 52 weeks without proof and can cost a step mark.
- State the overhead uplift explicitly — '₹5,00,000 × 110% = ₹5,50,000 ÷ 6 = ₹91,667'; don't just write ₹91,667 out of nowhere or the examiner can't award the method mark.

2Examiner-rewarded phrases

“Effective machine hours = Budgeted working hours – Set-up and changeover hours”“Machine Hour Rate = Total Annual Machine Cost / Effective Machine Hours”“Departmental and general works overhead allocated to the machine (1/6th share)”

3Common trap

Don't fall for this

The biggest trap here is using 2,496 hours as your denominator — most students use budgeted working hours directly and forget to strip out the 312 set-up hours. But watch the flip side too: electricity is calculated on the full 2,496 production hours (set-up hours included) PLUS the 416 maintenance hours — so the hours in your cost numerator and your denominator are deliberately different, and that's correct.

🎯 Practice more Machine hour rate, absorption costing, overhead questions →
Q.4 00 marks easy Activity-based costing, absorption costing, overhead allocat ⚡ Try this Q →
The following budgeted information relates to N Ltd. for the year 2021: Products X, Y, Z with Production and Sales (units): 1,00,000, 80,000, 60,000; Selling price per unit (₹) 90, 180, 140; Direct cost per unit (₹) 50, 90, 95; Machine department (machine hours per unit): 3, 4, 5; Assembly department (direct labour hours per unit): 6, 4, 3. The estimated overhead expenses for the year 2021 will be Machine Department ₹ 73,60,000 and Assembly Department ₹ 55,00,000. Overhead expenses are apportioned on basis of machine hours for Machine Department and labour hours for Assembly Department. After a detailed study of the activities the following cost pools and their respective cost drivers are found with specific amounts and quantities. As per an estimate the activities will be used by the three products with given set-ups, customer orders, and purchase orders. You are required to PREPARE a product-wise profit statement using:
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Activity-based costing, absorption costing, overhead allocation, cost drivers
✓ 43-line worked answer · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 851 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.5 00 marks easy Cost sheet preparation, prime cost, factory cost, cost of go ⚡ Try this Q →
RTA Ltd. has the following expenditures for the year ended 31st December, 2020: Raw materials purchased ₹ 5,00,00,000; Freight inward ₹ 9,20,600; Wages paid to factory workers ₹ 25,20,000; Royalty paid for production ₹ 1,80,000; Amount paid for power & fuel ₹ 3,50,000; Job charges paid to job workers ₹ 3,10,000; Stores and spares consumed ₹ 1,10,000; Depreciation on office building ₹ 50,000; Repairs & Maintenance for Plant & Machinery ₹ 40,000 and Sales office building ₹ 20,000; Insurance premium for Plant & Machinery ₹ 28,200 and Factory building ₹ 18,800; Expenses paid for quality control check activities ₹ 18,000; Research & development cost ₹ 20,000; Expenses for pollution control and engineering & maintenance ₹ 36,000; Salary paid to Sales & Marketing managers ₹ 5,60,000; Salary paid to General Manager ₹ 6,40,000; Packing cost for primary packing ₹ 46,000 and for re-distribution ₹ 80,000; Fee paid to independent directors ₹ 1,20,000; Performance bonus paid to sales staffs ₹ 1,20,000; Opening stock: Raw materials ₹ 10,00,000, Work-in-process ₹ 8,60,000, Finished goods ₹ 12,00,000; Closing stock: Raw materials ₹ 8,40,000, Work-in-process ₹ 6,60,000, Finished goods ₹ 10,50,000; Amount realized by selling of scrap and waste ₹ 48,000. From the above data you are requested to PREPARE Statement of Cost for RTA Ltd. for the year ended 31st December, 2020, showing:
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Cost sheet preparation, prime cost, factory cost, cost of goods sold
✓ 14-line worked answer · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 851 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.6 00 marks easy Cost accounting, financial accounting reconciliation, overhe ⚡ Try this Q →
The financial books of a company reveal the following data for the year ended 31st March, 2020: Opening Stock: Finished goods 625 units ₹ 1,06,250, Work-in-process ₹ 92,000; Raw materials consumed ₹ 16,80,000; Direct Labour ₹ 12,20,000; Factory overheads ₹ 8,44,000; Administration overheads (production related) ₹ 3,96,000; Dividend paid ₹ 2,44,000; Bad Debts ₹ 36,000; Selling and Distribution Overheads ₹ 1,44,000; Interest received ₹ 76,000; Rent received ₹ 92,000; Sales 12,615 units ₹ 45,60,000; Closing Stock: Finished goods 415 units ₹ 91,300, Work-in-process ₹ 82,400. The cost records provide: Factory overheads are absorbed at 70% of direct wages; Administration overheads are recovered at 15% of factory cost; Selling and distribution overheads are charged at ₹ 6 per unit sold; Opening Stock of finished goods is valued at ₹ 240 per unit; The company values work-in-process at factory cost for both Financial and Cost Profit Reporting. Required:
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Cost accounting, financial accounting reconciliation, overhead absorption
✓ 36-line worked answer · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 851 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.7 00 marks easy Job costing, overhead recovery rates, pricing ⚡ Try this Q →
SM Motors Ltd. is a manufacturer of auto components. Following are the details of expenses for the year 2019-20: Opening Stock of Material ₹ 15,00,000; Closing Stock of Material ₹ 20,00,000; Purchase of Material ₹ 1,80,50,000; Direct Labour ₹ 90,50,000; Factory Overhead ₹ 30,80,000; Administrative Overhead ₹ 20,50,400. During the FY 2020-21, the company has received an order from a car manufacturer where it estimates that the cost of material and labour will be ₹ 80,00,000 and ₹ 40,50,000 respectively. The company charges factory overhead as a percentage of direct labour and administrative overheads as a percentage of factory cost based on previous year's cost. Cost of delivery of the components at customer's premises is estimated at ₹ 4,50,000. You are required to:
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Job costing, overhead recovery rates, pricing
✓ 21-line worked answer · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 851 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.8 00 marks easy Process costing, equivalent production, normal loss, cost ac ⚡ Try this Q →
A company produces a component, which passes through two processes. During the month of November, 2020, materials for 40,000 components were put into Process-I of which 30,000 were completed and transferred to Process-II. Those not transferred to Process-II were 100% complete as to materials cost and 50% complete as to labour and overheads cost. The Process-I costs incurred were Direct Materials ₹ 3,00,000, Direct Wages ₹ 3,50,000, Factory Overheads ₹ 2,45,000. Of those transferred to Process II, 28,000 units were completed and transferred to finished goods stores. There was a normal loss with no salvage value of 200 units in Process II. There were 1,800 units remained unfinished in the process with 100% complete as to materials and 25% complete as regard to wages and overheads. Costs incurred in Process-II are: Packing Materials ₹ 80,000, Direct Wages ₹ 71,125, Factory Overheads ₹ 85,350. Packing material cost is incurred at the end of the second process as protective packing to the completed units of production. Required:
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Process costing, equivalent production, normal loss, cost accounting
✓ 44-line worked answer · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 851 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.9 00 marks easy Service costing, transportation cost allocation, differentia ⚡ Try this Q →
VPS is a public school having 25 buses each plying in different directions for the transport of its school students. In view of large number of students availing of the bus service, the buses work two shifts daily both in the morning and in the afternoon. The buses are garaged in the school. The workload of the students has been so arranged that in the morning, the first trip picks up senior students and the second trip plying an hour later picks up junior students. Similarly, in the afternoon, the first trip takes the junior students and an hour later the second trip takes the senior students home. The distance travelled by each bus, one way is 8 km. The school works 22 days in a month and remains closed for vacation in May and June. The bus fee, however, is payable by the students for all the 12 months in a year. Detailed annual expenses provided include driver's salary, cleaner's salary, license fees, insurance premium, repairs and maintenance, bus purchase price, life, scrap value, and diesel cost. The school follows differential transportation fees based on distance travelled: 2 km (25% of Full), 4 km (50% of Full), 8 km (Full). Due to a pandemic, lockdown imposed on schools from April 2020 to December 2020. Drivers and cleaners were paid 75% of their salary during the lockdown period. Repairing cost reduced to 75% for the year 2020. Required:
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Service costing, transportation cost allocation, differential pricing
✓ 53-line worked answer · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 851 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.10 00 marks easy Standard costing, variances, material variance, labour varia ⚡ Try this Q →
LM Limited produces a product 'SX4' which is sold in a 10 Kg. packet. The standard cost card per packet of 'SX4' is: Direct materials 10 kg @ ₹ 90 per kg ₹ 900; Direct labour 8 hours @ ₹ 80 per hour ₹ 640; Variable Overhead 8 hours @ ₹ 20 per hour ₹ 160; Fixed Overhead ₹ 250; Total ₹ 1,950. Budgeted output for a quarter of a year was 10,000 Kg. Actual output is 9,000 Kg. Actual costs for this quarter are: Direct Materials 8,900 Kg @ ₹ 92 per Kg. ₹ 8,18,800; Direct Labour 7,000 hours @ ₹ 84 per hour ₹ 5,88,000; Variable Overhead incurred ₹ 1,40,000; Fixed Overhead incurred ₹ 2,60,000. You are required to CALCULATE:
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Standard costing, variances, material variance, labour variance, overhead variance
✓ 25-line worked answer · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 851 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.11 00 marks easy Marginal costing, P/V ratio, break-even analysis, contributi ⚡ Try this Q →
Aditya Limited manufactures three different products. The current product mix information is: Products S, T, U with Sales Mix 35%, 35%, 30%; Selling Price ₹ 300, ₹ 400, ₹ 200; Variable Cost ₹ 150, ₹ 200, ₹ 120; Total Fixed Costs ₹ 18,00,000; Total Sales ₹ 60,00,000. The company has currently under discussion, a proposal to discontinue the manufacture of Product U and replace it with Product M, when the following results are anticipated: Products S, T, M with Sales Mix 50%, 25%, 25%; Selling Price ₹ 300, ₹ 400, ₹ 300; Variable Cost ₹ 150, ₹ 200, ₹ 150; Total Fixed Costs ₹ 18,00,000; Total Sales ₹ 64,00,000. Required:
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Marginal costing, P/V ratio, break-even analysis, contribution
✓ 27-line worked answer · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 851 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.12 00 marks easy Budgeting, production budget, material purchase budget, sale ⚡ Try this Q →
RS Ltd manufactures and sells a single product and has estimated sales revenue of ₹ 302.4 lakh during the year based on 20% profit on selling price. Each unit of product requires 6 kg of material A and 3 kg of material B and processing time of 4 hours in machine shop and 2 hours in assembly shop. Factory overheads are absorbed at a blanket rate of 20% of direct labour. Variable selling & distribution overheads are ₹ 60 per unit sold and fixed selling & distribution overheads are estimated to be ₹ 69,12,000. Other relevant details include Purchase Price: Material A ₹ 160 per kg, Material B ₹ 100 per kg; Labour Rate: Machine Shop ₹ 140 per hour, Assembly Shop ₹ 70 per hour; Finished Stock Opening 2,500 units, Closing 3,000 units; Material A Opening 7,500 kg, Closing 8,000 kg; Material B Opening 4,000 kg, Closing 5,500 kg. Required:
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Budgeting, production budget, material purchase budget, sales budgeting
✓ 19-line worked answer · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 851 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.13 00 marks easy Cost-plus contracts, joint cost apportionment, cost classifi ⚡ Try this Q →
Miscellaneous questions on cost accounting topics.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Cost-plus contracts, joint cost apportionment, cost classification, budget manual
✓ 85-line worked answer · ✓ 4 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 851 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Start 15-min diagnostic