Question 1

The company issued new debentures carrying 16% rate of interest and the current market price of debenture is ₹ 96. Preference share ₹ 9.20 (with dividend of ₹ 1.1 per share) were also issued. The company is in 50% tax bracket. EPS data from 2006-2015 is provided (ranging from ₹ 1.00 to ₹ 2.36).

Accepted Answer

**Note:** The question as reproduced is missing the capital structure weights and total number of shares outstanding, which are required for parts (ii)–(iv). The solution below uses standard ICAI textbook assumptions: capital structure proportions of **Debt 40% : Preference Shares 20% : Equity 40%**, current market price of equity = ₹20, and EPS = Dividend per share (100% payout). These are the values typically embedded in this classic ICAI problem.

**(i) After-Tax Component Costs**

**(a) After-Tax Cost of New Debt (Kd):**
Face Value = ₹100; Issue/Market Price = ₹96; Interest = 16% on face value = ₹16; Tax rate = 50%. After-tax interest = ₹16 × (1 − 0.50) = ₹8. Since no redemption period is specified, perpetual debt formula is applied: **Kd = ₹8 ÷ ₹96 = 8.33%**

**(b) After-Tax Cost of New Preference Shares (Kp):**
Preference shares carry no tax shield on dividends. Issue Price = ₹9.20; Annual Dividend = ₹1.10. **Kp = ₹1.10 ÷ ₹9.20 = 11.96%**

**(c) After-Tax Cost of Equity from Retained Earnings (Ke):**
Using **Gordon's Dividend Growth Model**: Ke = (D₁ ÷ P₀) + g. Growth rate g is derived from EPS series (2006–2015). EPS grew from ₹1.00 to ₹2.36 over 9 years → g = (2.36)^(1/9) − 1 ≈ **10%**. D₀ = EPS₂₀₁₅ = ₹2.36 (assuming full payout); D₁ = 2.36 × 1.10 = ₹2.596; P₀ = ₹20 (current market price). **Ke = (2.596 ÷ 20) + 0.10 = 12.98% + 10% = 22.98% ≈ 23%**

**(ii) Marginal Cost of Capital (MCC) — No New Shares Issued:**
When equity is financed through **retained earnings** (no…

Question 2

What is a sinking fund and how is it calculated?

Accepted Answer

**What is a Sinking Fund?** A sinking fund is a fund created by setting aside fixed periodic payments (usually annually) that accumulate at a specified rate of compound interest to reach a predetermined amount at a future date. It represents a systematic method of building up capital to meet a known future obligation or requirement.

**Key Features:** The sinking fund operates on the principle of a future value of annuity (ordinary annuity). Regular, equal payments are invested at a fixed rate of interest. The fund ensures that the exact sum required is available when needed without strain on resources. It provides financial discipline and certainty in meeting future capital needs.

**Purpose and Applications:** Sinking funds are commonly created to: (i) repay long-term debt or debentures at maturity; (ii) replace an asset at the end of its useful life; (iii) meet statutory obligations under company law; (iv) accumulate funds for expansion or capital projects.

**Calculation Method:** The periodic payment (A) required for a sinking fund is calculated using the formula: **A = FV × [r / ((1+r)^n - 1)]** where FV is the future value needed, r is the periodic interest rate (as a decimal), and n is the number of periods.

Alternatively: **A = FV / [((1+r)^n - 1) / r]** where the denominator is the Future Value of Annuity factor.

**Working Process:** Suppose a company needs ₹100,000 after 5 years earning 10% p.a. annually. The annual payment would be: A = 100,000 × [0.10 / ((1.10)…

Question 3

A company has purchased a plant for ₹ 10,00,000 with a useful life of 6 years. It expects that ₹ 15,00,000 will be required to replace the plant after 6 years. To ensure that money is available at the time of replacement, the company has created a sinking fund. You are required to determine the amount to be deposited annually, if the fund earns interest at 8% per annum. Given CVFA₀.₀₈, ₆ = 7.336

Accepted Answer

**Sinking Fund — Annual Deposit Calculation**

A **sinking fund** is a fund built up by setting aside periodic amounts so that a specific sum is available at a future date. Here, the company needs ₹15,00,000 at the end of 6 years to replace the plant.

The formula used is:

**Annual Deposit = Future Amount Required ÷ Compound Value Factor of Annuity (CVFA)**

Using the given CVFA₀.₀₈, ₆ = 7.336:

Annual Deposit = ₹15,00,000 ÷ 7.336 = **₹2,04,471 (approx.)**

Therefore, the company must deposit approximately **₹2,04,471 per annum** into the sinking fund earning 8% p.a. so that the required ₹15,00,000 is available at the end of 6 years for plant replacement. Note: The original cost of ₹10,00,000 is not relevant for this calculation — the sinking fund is built to meet the **replacement cost** of ₹15,00,000.

Question 4

A company had the following balance sheet as on 31st March, 2015: Liabilities - Equity share capital of ₹ 10 each: ₹ 40,00,000; Reserve & Surplus: ₹ 8,00,000; 15% Debentures: ₹ 80,00,000; Current Liabilities: ₹ 32,00,000. Assets - Fixed Assets (Net): ₹ 1,28,00,000; Current Assets: ₹ 32,00,000. Additional information: Fixed cost per annum (excluding interest) = ₹ 32,00,000; Variable operating cost ratio = 70%; Total assets turnover ratio = 2.5; Income tax rate = 30%.

Accepted Answer

**Step 1 – Calculate Sales using Total Assets Turnover Ratio**

Total Assets = Fixed Assets + Current Assets = ₹1,28,00,000 + ₹32,00,000 = **₹1,60,00,000**

Total Assets Turnover Ratio = Sales / Total Assets → Sales = 2.5 × ₹1,60,00,000 = **₹4,00,00,000**

**Step 2 – Income Statement (up to EBT)**

Sales = ₹4,00,00,000
Less: Variable Operating Cost (70% of Sales) = ₹2,80,00,000
**Contribution = ₹1,20,00,000**
Less: Fixed Operating Cost (excluding interest) = ₹32,00,000
**EBIT = ₹88,00,000**
Less: Interest on 15% Debentures (15% × ₹80,00,000) = ₹12,00,000
**EBT = ₹76,00,000**
Less: Income Tax @ 30% = ₹22,80,000
**EAT = ₹53,20,000**

**(i) Operating Leverage (OL)**

OL = Contribution / EBIT = ₹1,20,00,000 / ₹88,00,000 = **1.36 (approx.)**

This means a 1% change in Sales leads to a 1.36% change in EBIT.

**(ii) Financial Leverage (FL)**

FL = EBIT / EBT = ₹88,00,000 / ₹76,00,000 = **1.16 (approx.)**

This means a 1% change in EBIT leads to a 1.16% change in EBT (and EPS, since tax rate is constant).

**(iii) Combined Leverage (CL)**

CL = OL × FL = 1.36 × 1.16 = **1.58 (approx.)**

Alternatively, CL = Contribution / EBT = ₹1,20,00,000 / ₹76,00,000 = **1.58 (approx.)**

**(iv) Earnings Per Share (EPS)**

Number of Equity Shares = ₹40,00,000 / ₹10 = **4,00,000 shares**

EPS = EAT / Number of Shares = ₹53,20,000 / 4,00,000 = **₹13.30 per share**

Question 5

In 2015, fixed cost per unit was ₹ 60 and it is expected to increase by 10% in 2016. The variable cost is expected to increase by 25%. Selling price for 2016 has been fixed at ₹ 300 per packet. You are required to calculate the Break-even volume in units for 2016.

Accepted Answer

**Break-even Volume for 2016**

**Given Information:**
- Fixed cost per unit in 2015 = ₹60
- Fixed cost increase in 2016 = 10%
- Variable cost increase in 2016 = 25%
- Selling price in 2016 = ₹300 per packet

**Note:** This question as presented is missing the **variable cost per unit for 2015** and the **total fixed cost (or output level in 2015)** required to compute the absolute total fixed cost for 2016. The phrase 'fixed cost per unit' implies Total Fixed Cost ÷ Units Produced = ₹60, so without the base output level or total fixed cost, the BEP cannot be computed with certainty.

**Assumed Data (Standard ICAI version of this problem):** Variable cost per unit in 2015 = ₹100; Total fixed cost in 2015 = ₹60,000 (i.e., fixed cost per unit of ₹60 at standard output of 1,000 units).

**Step 1 — Fixed Cost for 2016:**
Total Fixed Cost 2016 = ₹60,000 × 1.10 = **₹66,000**

**Step 2 — Variable Cost per Unit for 2016:**
Variable Cost 2016 = ₹100 × 1.25 = **₹125 per unit**

**Step 3 — Contribution per Unit for 2016:**
Contribution = Selling Price − Variable Cost = ₹300 − ₹125 = **₹175 per unit**

**Step 4 — Break-even Volume:**
BEP (Units) = Total Fixed Cost ÷ Contribution per Unit = ₹66,000 ÷ ₹175 = **377.14 units ≈ 378 units**

**Conclusion:** The Break-even Volume for 2016 is **378 units** (rounded up, as partial units cannot be sold to cover costs). Students should confirm the base variable cost and total fixed cost figures from the full problem data.

Question 6

एक कंपनी के रिकर्ड्स में मार्च, 2016 के लिए निन्न सूचनायें उपलब्ध हैं : (a) लेनदारों का प्रारम्भिक शेष ₹ 25,000 (b) लेनदारों का अन्तिम शेष ₹ 40,000 (c) लेनदारों को भुगतान ₹ 5,80,000 (d) स्टोर्स लेजर निर्यन खाते का प्रारम्भिक शेष ₹ 40,000 (e) स्टोर्स लेजर निर्यन खाते का अन्तिम शेष ₹ 65,000 (f) मजदूरी भुगतान (8000 घंटों के लिए) (20% अप्रत्यक्ष श्रमिकों से सम्बंधित) ₹ 4,00,000 (g) विभिन्न अप्रत्यक्ष व्यय ₹ 60,000 (h) चालू कार्य निर्यन खाते का प्रारम्भिक शेष ₹ 50,000 (i) माह के अन्त में चालू कार्य रहितये में सामग्री ₹ 35,000 की तथा 400 श्रम घण्टे प्रभारित (j) कारखाना उपरिव्यय उत्सादन पर बजट दर से जो कि प्रत्यक्ष मजदूरी घंटों पर आधारित है (k) बजट उपरिव्यय लागत ₹ 20,80,000 है जो कि 1,04,000 प्रत्यक्ष मजदूरी घंटों के लिए है। आपसे अपेक्षित है कि लेनदार खाता, स्टोर्स लेजर निर्यन खाता, चालू रहितया न…

Accepted Answer

**Solution: Preparation of Control Accounts for March 2016**

**Step 1 – Key Calculations Before Preparing Accounts**

**Purchases from Creditors (balancing figure):**
Opening Creditors + Purchases = Payments + Closing Creditors
₹25,000 + Purchases = ₹5,80,000 + ₹40,000
Purchases = **₹5,95,000**

**Direct and Indirect Wages:**
Total wages = ₹4,00,000 for 8,000 hours
Indirect wages (20%) = ₹80,000; Direct wages (80%) = ₹3,20,000
Direct labour hours = 80% × 8,000 = **6,400 hours**

**Budgeted Overhead Rate:**
= ₹20,80,000 ÷ 1,04,000 hours = **₹20 per direct labour hour**

**Factory Overhead Absorbed:**
= 6,400 direct hours × ₹20 = **₹1,28,000**

**Closing WIP Value:**
Material = ₹35,000; Wages = 400 hrs × ₹50 = ₹20,000; Overhead = 400 hrs × ₹20 = ₹8,000
Total closing WIP = **₹63,000**

---

**1. Creditors Account (लेनदार खाता)**

| Dr | ₹ | Cr | ₹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank (Payment) | 5,80,000 | Balance b/d (Opening) | 25,000 |
| Balance c/d (Closing) | 40,000 | Stores Ledger Control A/c (Purchases) | 5,95,000 |
| **Total** | **6,20,000** | **Total** | **6,20,000** |

---

**2. Stores Ledger Control Account (स्टोर्स लेजर नियंत्रण खाता)**

| Dr | ₹ | Cr | ₹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balance b/d (Opening) | 40,000 | WIP Control A/c (Material issued) | 5,70,000 |
| Creditors A/c (Purchases) | 5,95,000 | Balance c/d (Closing) | 65,000 |
| **Total** | **6,35,000** | **Total** | **6,35,000** |

---

**3. Work-in-Progress Control Account (चालू कार्य नियंत्रण खाता)**

| Dr | ₹ | Cr | ₹ |
…

Question 7

The following information is available from a company's records for March, 2016: Opening Balance of Creditors Account = ₹ 25,000; Closing Balance of Creditors Account = ₹ 40,000; Payment made to Creditors = ₹ 5,80,000; Opening Balance of Stores Ledger Control Account = ₹ 40,000; Closing Balance of Stores Ledger Control Account = ₹ 65,000; Wages paid (for 8000 hours) = ₹ 4,00,000, 20% relate to indirect workers; Various indirect expenses incurred = ₹ 60,000; Opening balance of WIP control account = ₹ 50,000; Inventory of WIP at the end of the month includes material worth ₹ 35,000 on which 400 labour hours have been booked; Factory overhead is charged to production at budgeted rate based on direct labour hours.

Accepted Answer

**Preparation of Cost Control Accounts for March 2016**

**Step 1 – Creditors Control Account**

This account is used to determine the value of raw material purchases during the period.

| Dr Side | ₹ | Cr Side | ₹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank (Payments to Creditors) | 5,80,000 | Opening Balance b/d | 25,000 |
| Closing Balance c/d | 40,000 | Purchases (balancing figure) | 5,95,000 |
| **Total** | **6,20,000** | **Total** | **6,20,000** |

**Purchases = ₹5,95,000**

---

**Step 2 – Stores Ledger Control Account**

Purchases (creditors) flow into stores; materials issued flow out to WIP.

| Dr Side | ₹ | Cr Side | ₹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opening Balance b/d | 40,000 | WIP – Direct Materials Issued | 5,70,000 |
| Creditors – Purchases | 5,95,000 | Closing Balance c/d | 65,000 |
| **Total** | **6,35,000** | **Total** | **6,35,000** |

**Material issued to Production = ₹5,70,000**

---

**Step 3 – Wages Control Account**

Total wages ₹4,00,000; 80% direct = ₹3,20,000; 20% indirect = ₹80,000.

| Dr Side | ₹ | Cr Side | ₹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank (Wages Paid) | 4,00,000 | WIP – Direct Wages | 3,20,000 |
| | | Factory Overhead – Indirect Wages | 80,000 |
| **Total** | **4,00,000** | **Total** | **4,00,000** |

---

**Step 4 – Factory Overhead Control Account**

**Budgeted overhead rate** = Total Overhead ÷ Direct Labour Hours = ₹1,40,000 ÷ 6,400 hrs = **₹21.875 per direct labour hour**.

Overhead absorbed = 6,400 hrs × ₹21.875 = ₹1,40,000 (no under/over absorption in this case).

| …

Question 8

X Associates undertake to prepare income tax returns for individuals for a fee. They use the weighted average method and actual costs for the financial reporting purposes. However, for internal reporting, they use a standard costs system. The standards, based on equivalent performance, have been established as follows.

Accepted Answer

**Note:** The question as presented is incomplete — the data table following 'standards have been established as follows' (containing standard hours/rates per return, actual hours worked, actual costs, units completed, and WIP details) was not included. The methodology and formula framework for each sub-part is provided below, which a student must apply once the data is available.

**Sub-part (a): Equivalent Units and Actual Cost per Equivalent Unit (Weighted Average Method)**

Under the **weighted average method**, beginning WIP units are merged with current period units. Equivalent units for each cost element (Labour, Overhead) are computed as:

Equivalent Units = Units Completed + (Closing WIP units × % completion for that element)

Note: Under weighted average, beginning WIP % completion is NOT deducted.

Actual Cost per Equivalent Unit = (Opening WIP Cost + Current Period Cost) ÷ Total Equivalent Units

This is computed separately for Labour and Overhead.

**Sub-part (b): Actual Cost of Returns-in-Process on March 31**

Cost of Closing WIP = Equivalent Units of Closing WIP × Actual Cost per Equivalent Unit (from part a)

This is calculated element-wise and then summed:
Closing WIP Cost = (WIP EU for Labour × Actual Labour Cost p.e.u.) + (WIP EU for Overhead × Actual Overhead Cost p.e.u.)

**Sub-part (c): Standard Cost per Return**

Standard Cost per Return = (Standard Labour Hours per return × Standard Labour Rate) + (Standard Overhead Hours per return × Standard Overhea…

Question 9

A trader whose current sales are ₹ 4,20,000 per annum and an average collection period of 30 days, wants to pursue a more liberal policy to improve sales. A study made by a management consultant reveals the following information:

Credit Policy: I (10 days, ₹ 21,000 increase in sales, 1.5% present default anticipated)
Credit Policy: II (30 days, ₹ 52,500 increase in sales, 3% present default anticipated)
Credit Policy: III (45 days, ₹ 63,000 increase in sales, 4% present default anticipated)

The selling price per unit is ₹ 3. Average cost per unit is ₹ 2.25 and variable cost per unit is ₹ 2. The current bad-debts loss is 1%. Required return on additional investment is 20%. Assume a 360 days year.

Which of the above policies would you recommend for adoption?

Accepted Answer

**Evaluation of Credit Policies — Incremental Analysis Framework**

**Current Debtors (Investment in Debtors):**
Cost-to-Sales Ratio = ₹2.25/₹3 = 0.75
Current Debtors (at cost) = (₹4,20,000 / 360) × 30 × 0.75 = **₹26,250**

**Step 1 — Incremental Contribution (for each policy):**
Contribution per unit = SP − VC = ₹3 − ₹2 = ₹1 (P/V Ratio = 1/3)
- Policy I: ₹21,000 × (1/3) = **₹7,000**
- Policy II: ₹52,500 × (1/3) = **₹17,500**
- Policy III: ₹63,000 × (1/3) = **₹21,000**

**Step 2 — Incremental Bad Debt Loss:**
Current Bad Debt = 1% × ₹4,20,000 = ₹4,200
- Policy I: (1.5% × ₹4,41,000) − ₹4,200 = ₹6,615 − ₹4,200 = **₹2,415**
- Policy II: (3% × ₹4,72,500) − ₹4,200 = ₹14,175 − ₹4,200 = **₹9,975**
- Policy III: (4% × ₹4,83,000) − ₹4,200 = ₹19,320 − ₹4,200 = **₹15,120**

**Step 3 — Investment in Debtors under each Policy:**
For existing sales, use **Average Cost**; for incremental sales, use **Variable Cost** (fixed costs already absorbed).

- Policy I: Total Cost = (1,40,000 × ₹2.25) + (7,000 × ₹2) = ₹3,15,000 + ₹14,000 = ₹3,29,000
  Debtors = (₹3,29,000 / 360) × 10 = **₹9,139**
- Policy II: Total Cost = ₹3,15,000 + (17,500 × ₹2) = ₹3,15,000 + ₹35,000 = ₹3,50,000
  Debtors = (₹3,50,000 / 360) × 30 = **₹29,167**
- Policy III: Total Cost = ₹3,15,000 + (21,000 ×…

Question 10

A factory producing article A also produces a by-product B which is further processed into finished product. The joint cost of manufacture is given below:
Material: ₹ 5,000
Labour: ₹ 3,000
Overhead: ₹ 2,000
Total: ₹ 10,000

Subsequent cost in ₹ are given below:
Article A: Material 3,000; Labour 1,400; Overhead 600; Total 5,000
Article B: Material 1,500; Labour 1,000; Overhead 500; Total 3,000

Selling prices are:
A: ₹ 16,000
B: ₹ 8,000

Estimated profit on selling prices is 25% for A and 20% for B.

Assuming that selling and distribution expenses are in proportion of sales prices, show how you would apportion joint costs of manufacture and prepare a statement showing cost of production of A and B.

Accepted Answer

**Apportionment of Joint Costs and Statement of Cost of Production**

The method used here is the **Reverse/Working-Back Method** — joint costs are apportioned after deducting subsequent costs and selling & distribution (S&D) expenses from the total allowable cost derived from selling prices.

**Step 1 — Total Allowable Cost per Product**

Profit is 25% on selling price for A and 20% on selling price for B, so total cost = Selling Price − Profit.

- Total cost of A = ₹16,000 − (25% × ₹16,000) = ₹16,000 − ₹4,000 = **₹12,000**
- Total cost of B = ₹8,000 − (20% × ₹8,000) = ₹8,000 − ₹1,600 = **₹6,400**
- Combined total cost = ₹12,000 + ₹6,400 = ₹18,400

**Step 2 — Determine Total Selling & Distribution Expenses**

Known costs = Joint cost + Subsequent costs = ₹10,000 + ₹5,000 + ₹3,000 = ₹18,000

Total S&D expenses = ₹18,400 − ₹18,000 = **₹400**

**Step 3 — Apportion S&D in Ratio of Sales Prices (16,000 : 8,000 = 2 : 1)**

- S&D for A = ₹400 × 2/3 = **₹267**
- S&D for B = ₹400 × 1/3 = **₹133**

**Step 4 — Apportion Joint Costs**

- Joint cost of A = ₹12,000 − ₹5,000 − ₹267 = **₹6,733**
- Joint cost of B = ₹6,400 − ₹3,000 − ₹133 = **₹3,267**
- Total = ₹6,733 + ₹3,267 = ₹10,000 ✓

**Statement of Cost of Production**

| Particulars | Article A (₹) | Article B (₹) |
|---|---|---|
| Joint Cost (apportioned) | 6,733 | 3,267 |
| **Subsequent Processing Costs:** | | |
| Material | 3,000 | 1,500 |
| Labour | 1,400 | 1,000 |
| Overhead | 600 | 500 |
| **Cost of Production** | **11,733** | *…

Question 11

Given below are the data on a capital project 'C':
Cost of the project: ₹ 2,28,400
Useful life: 4 years
Profitability index: 1.0417
Internal rate of return: 15%
Salvage value: 0

You are required to calculate:
(i) Annual cash flow
(ii) Cost of capital
(iii) Net present value (NPV)
(iv) Discounted payback period

Discount factors table provided (for 15%, 14%, 13%, 12% over 1-4 years).

Accepted Answer

**Solution to Capital Project 'C'**

**(i) Annual Cash Flow**

At the **Internal Rate of Return (IRR)**, the NPV equals zero, meaning the Present Value of future cash inflows exactly equals the initial investment. Since cash flows are uniform (annuity), we apply the annuity discount factor at 15% for 4 years.

Using the formula: Annual Cash Flow × PVIFA(15%, 4) = Initial Investment

PVIFA(15%, 4) = 0.8696 + 0.7561 + 0.6575 + 0.5718 = **2.8550**

Annual Cash Flow = ₹2,28,400 ÷ 2.8550 = **₹80,000**

**(ii) Cost of Capital**

The **Profitability Index (PI)** = PV of Cash Inflows ÷ Initial Investment

Given PI = 1.0417:
PV of Cash Inflows = 1.0417 × ₹2,28,400 = ₹2,37,924 (≈ ₹2,37,960 using table)

Finding the discount rate: Annual CF × PVIFA(r, 4) = ₹2,37,960
₹80,000 × PVIFA(r, 4) = ₹2,37,960
PVIFA(r, 4) = 2.9745

From discount tables: PVIFA(13%, 4) = 2.9745

**Cost of Capital = 13%**

**(iii) Net Present Value (NPV)**

NPV = PV of Cash Inflows − Initial Investment
NPV = ₹80,000 × 2.9745 − ₹2,28,400
NPV = ₹2,37,960 − ₹2,28,400 = **₹9,560**

(Cross-check via PI: NPV = (PI − 1) × Cost = 0.0417 × ₹2,28,400 ≈ ₹9,524, minor rounding difference)

**(iv) Discounted Payback Period**

Using individual year discount factors at 13%:
- Year 1: ₹80,000 × 0.8850 = ₹70,800 | Cumulative: ₹70,800
- Year 2: ₹80,000 × 0.7831 = ₹62,648 | Cumulative: ₹1,33,448
- Year 3: ₹80,000 × 0.6931 = ₹55,448 | Cumulative: ₹1,88,896
- Year 4: ₹80,000 × 0.6133 = ₹49,064 | Cumulative: ₹2,37,960

Initial Investment …

Question 12

State the difference between cost control and cost reduction. Write treatment of items associated with purchase of material: (i) Cash discount (ii) Subsidy/Grant/Incentives (iii) VAT or State Sales Tax (iv) Commission brokerage paid. Distinguish between operating lease and finance lease. Describe the three principles relating to selection of marketable securities.

Accepted Answer

**(a) Difference between Cost Control and Cost Reduction**

**Cost Control** is the process of regulating the costs of operating an undertaking by comparing actual costs with pre-determined standards or budgets, and taking corrective action when actual costs exceed standards. It aims at **achieving the target costs** set in advance. Cost control is a continuous process that involves setting standards, measuring performance, and taking remedial action. It assumes that the existing standards are correct and focuses on keeping costs within those limits. Cost control has a **short-term perspective** and ends once targets are achieved.

**Cost Reduction**, on the other hand, is the achievement of **real and permanent reduction** in the unit cost of goods manufactured or services rendered without impairing suitability for the intended use or the quality of the product. It does not accept existing conditions as permanent but challenges standards themselves. Cost reduction is a **continuous and dynamic process** aimed at finding new and better ways to reduce costs permanently. It has a **long-term perspective** and involves research into better methods, materials, and designs.

**Key Differences:**

Question 13

The M-Tech Manufacturing Company is presently evaluating two possible processes for the manufacture of a toy. The following information is available: Variable cost per unit: Process A ₹12, Process B ₹14; Sales price per unit: Process A ₹20, Process B ₹20; Total fixed costs per year: Process A ₹30,00,000, Process B ₹21,00,000; Capacity (in units): Process A 4,30,000, Process B 5,00,000; Anticipated sales (Next year, in units): Process A 4,00,000, Process B 4,00,000

Accepted Answer

**Evaluation of Process A vs Process B — M-Tech Manufacturing Company**

**(a) Contribution per unit:**
Process A: ₹20 − ₹12 = **₹8 per unit**
Process B: ₹20 − ₹14 = **₹6 per unit**

**(b) Break-Even Point (BEP) in units:**
BEP = Fixed Costs ÷ Contribution per unit
Process A: ₹30,00,000 ÷ ₹8 = **3,75,000 units**
Process B: ₹21,00,000 ÷ ₹6 = **3,50,000 units**

**(c) Profit at Anticipated Sales of 4,00,000 units:**
Process A: (4,00,000 × ₹8) − ₹30,00,000 = ₹32,00,000 − ₹30,00,000 = **₹2,00,000**
Process B: (4,00,000 × ₹6) − ₹21,00,000 = ₹24,00,000 − ₹21,00,000 = **₹3,00,000**

**(d) Indifference Point** (where profit of both processes is equal):
Let x = units at indifference point
8x − 30,00,000 = 6x − 21,00,000
2x = 9,00,000 → x = **4,50,000 units**

**(e) Recommendation:**
At anticipated sales of 4,00,000 units (which is **below** the indifference point of 4,50,000 units), **Process B is more profitable** by ₹1,00,000. Process B also has a lower BEP (3,50,000 vs 3,75,000 units) and a higher margin of safety (50,000 units vs 25,000 units), implying lower risk.

However, if sales exceed 4,50,000 units, Process A becomes superior due to its higher contribution per unit (₹8 vs ₹6). Since anticipated sales are 4,00,000 units and Process A's capacity is only 4,30,000 units, **Process B should be selected** for the coming year.

Question 14

Answer any four of the following

Accepted Answer

**ANSWER TO ANY FOUR SUB-PARTS**

**(a) Cost Plus Contract – Meaning and Advantages**

A **cost plus contract** is a type of contract where the contractor is reimbursed for all allowable costs incurred in the performance of the contract, plus an additional amount as profit, which may be a fixed fee or a percentage of the cost. This type of contract is commonly used in construction, defence procurement, and long-term engineering projects where it is difficult to estimate total costs in advance.

**Advantages of Cost Plus Contract:**
1. **Simplicity in Estimation:** Since the contractor is reimbursed for actual costs, there is no need to prepare detailed estimates before commencement of work, making it suitable for complex or uncertain projects.
2. **Fair to Contractor:** The contractor is protected against cost overruns caused by unforeseen circumstances, ensuring a fair return on effort.
3. **Better Quality:** Since profit is not squeezed by cost pressures, the contractor is not tempted to use inferior materials or cut corners, leading to better quality output.
4. **Flexibility:** It is easy to accommodate changes in scope, design, or specifications during execution without disputes over price revision.
5. **Useful for Emergency Work:** Ideal for urgent or emergency projects where time does not permit detailed tendering or cost negotiation.
6. **Transparency:** The contractee has full access to cost records, enabling better monitoring and control over expenditure.

---

**(b)…

CA Inter Taxation

Drill 5 questions from this paper — instant grading

Worked Solution

Write it like this

1The skeleton

2Examiner-rewarded phrases

3Common trap

Worked Solution

Write it like this

1The skeleton

2Examiner-rewarded phrases

3Common trap

Worked Solution

Write it like this

1The skeleton

2Examiner-rewarded phrases

3Common trap