Imagine Mr. Sharma gives you a cheque for ₹2,00,000 to settle a loan. You deposit it, and the bank returns it stamped "Insufficient Funds." That's a dishonour of cheque — and under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, it's not just an inconvenience. It's a criminal offence.
The big idea: Section 138 protects honest payees by making cheque bouncing a punishable act. The drawer (the person who gave the cheque) can face imprisonment up to 2 years, or a fine up to twice the cheque amount, or both. So if the cheque was for ₹2,00,000, the fine can go up to ₹4,00,000. This applies only when the cheque is given for discharge of a legally enforceable debt or liability — not for gifts, donations, or future obligations that aren't yet due.
But here's the critical part — three conditions (provisos) must all be satisfied before the offence is made out, and this is where exams love to test you:
Proviso (a) — Presentation within validity: The cheque must be presented to the bank within 6 months from its date of issue, or within its validity period, whichever is earlier. Most cheques are valid for 3 months today, so in practice, present it within 3 months.
Proviso (b) — Demand Notice within 30 days: After receiving information from the bank that the cheque bounced, the payee must send a written legal notice to the drawer within 30 days. No verbal calls count — it must be in writing.
Proviso (c) — 15-day window for the drawer: After receiving the notice, the drawer gets 15 days to make the payment. If he pays within this window, no offence. If he doesn't — boom, the offence is complete and the payee can file a complaint.
All three provisos must be satisfied. Miss even one, and Section 138 doesn't apply. This is asked frequently as a 4-mark or 6-mark question — know the timeline cold: present → bounce → notice (30 days) → pay or face prosecution (15 days).
📊 Worked example
Example 1 — Full Timeline Check
Ms. Iyer lends ₹5,00,000 to Rajesh & Co. Pvt. Ltd. on 1st January 2026. Rajesh gives her a cheque dated 15th January 2026. She deposits it on 10th April 2026. The bank returns it unpaid on 12th April 2026 (insufficient funds). She receives the bank memo on 14th April 2026 and sends a legal notice to Rajesh on 20th May 2026.
Step 1 — Was the cheque presented within 6 months of its date?
Cheque date: 15 Jan 2026. Last date to present: 14 July 2026. Deposited: 10 April 2026. ✅ Within time.
Step 2 — Was notice sent within 30 days of receiving bank's information?
Bank memo received: 14 April 2026. Last date for notice: 14 May 2026. Notice sent: 20 May 2026. ❌ Notice is late by 6 days.
Conclusion: Proviso (b) is NOT satisfied. Section 138 offence is not made out. Ms. Iyer cannot proceed criminally under this section.
---
Example 2 — Successful Prosecution
Mr. Sharma issues a cheque for ₹1,50,000 to his supplier on 1st March 2026. The supplier deposits it on 20th March 2026. It bounces on 22nd March 2026. Supplier gets bank memo on 24th March 2026, sends written notice on 10th April 2026. Sharma does not pay within 15 days (deadline: 25th April 2026).
Step 1: Presented within 6 months? 20 March vs. deadline 28 August 2026. ✅
Step 2: Notice within 30 days of 24 March? Sent 10 April — that's day 17. ✅
Step 3: Payment within 15 days of notice receipt? Not paid by 25 April. ✅ Offence complete.
Maximum punishment: Imprisonment up to 2 years, OR fine up to ₹3,00,000 (2 × ₹1,50,000), or both.
⚠️ Common exam mistakes
- Students forget all 3 provisos must be satisfied together. If the cheque was presented late (even by one day beyond validity), Section 138 simply doesn't apply — don't argue about notice or payment in that case.
- Confusing the 30-day notice period start point. The 30 days run from the date the payee receives information from the bank about the bounce — not from the date the cheque was presented or the date the bank actually returned it internally.
- Thinking the offence is complete the moment the cheque bounces. Wrong — the offence is only complete when the drawer fails to pay within 15 days of receiving the notice. Payment within those 15 days is a full escape.
- Missing that the cheque must be for a legally enforceable debt. A cheque given as a gift, security for a future uncertain obligation, or for an illegal transaction does not attract Section 138. The Explanation clause specifically says "legally enforceable debt or liability."
- Miscalculating the maximum fine. Students write "fine up to the cheque amount" — it's actually twice the cheque amount. If the cheque is ₹2,00,000, the fine can be up to ₹4,00,000.
📖 Bare Act text — Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act 1881
(click to expand)
(1) Where any cheque drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker for payment of any amount of money to another person from out of that account for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability, is returned by the bank unpaid, either because of the amount of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient to honour the cheque or that it exceeds the amount arranged to be paid from that account by an agreement made with that bank, such person shall be deemed to have committed an offence and shall, without prejudice to any other provision of this Act, be punished with imprisonment for a term which may be extended to two years, or with fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or with both: Provided that nothing contained in this section shall apply unless— (a) the cheque has been presented to the bank within a period of six months from the date on which it is drawn or within the period of its validity, whichever is earlier; (b) the payee or the holder in due course of the cheque, as the case may be, makes a demand for the payment of the said amount of money by giving a notice in writing, to the drawer of the cheque, within thirty days of the receipt of information by him from the bank regarding the return of the cheque as unpaid; and (c) the drawer of such cheque fails to make the payment of the said amount of money to the payee or, as the case may be, to the holder in due course of the cheque, within fifteen days of the receipt of the said notice. Explanation.—For the purposes of this section, "debt of other liability" means a legally enforceable debt or other liability.
Test yourself
Practice questions on this section, AI-graded with citations.
⚡ Practice now →