Imagine Rajesh & Co. Pvt. Ltd. takes a ₹2 crore term loan from Punjab National Bank, pledging its factory as security. The bank now has a charge on that property. But here's the thing — this charge means nothing in law unless it is registered with the Registrar of Companies (ROC). That's exactly what Section 77 is about.
The Basic Rule: Every company that creates a charge — on any property, anywhere in India or abroad, tangible (like land or machinery) or intangible (like patents or receivables) — must file the particulars of that charge with the ROC within 30 days of its creation. The filing must be signed by both the company and the charge-holder (the lender), along with the charge-creation document (like a mortgage deed). This is asked frequently as a 4–5 mark question in exams, especially the timelines.
What if you miss the 30-day deadline? The Registrar can grant an extension, but the rules differ based on when the charge was created. For charges created on or after the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019 — the extension is up to 60 days (with additional fees). If even that 60-day window is missed, the Registrar can allow one final chance of a further 60 days, but this time with ad valorem fees (fees calculated as a percentage of the charge amount — so the bigger the loan, the higher the penalty). This makes late registration very expensive, so companies are nudged to comply on time.
The Big Consequence — Sub-section (3): This is the most exam-critical part. An unregistered charge is void against the liquidator and any other creditor. Meaning — if Rajesh & Co. winds up without registering PNB's charge, PNB gets treated like an unsecured creditor during liquidation. They lose their priority. However — and this is sub-section (4) — the debt itself doesn't disappear. PNB can still sue for recovery of ₹2 crore; they just lose the security benefit. Once the ROC registers the charge, they issue a Certificate of Registration, which is the company's proof of compliance.
📊 Worked example
Example 1 — Is the Charge Registered in Time?
ABC Pvt. Ltd. creates a charge of ₹50,00,000 on its Mumbai office in favour of HDFC Bank on 1st June 2024. The company files for registration on 20th July 2024.
Working:
- Date of charge creation: 1st June 2024
- Normal deadline (30 days): 1st July 2024
- Actual filing date: 20th July 2024 → 19 days late
- Since the charge is created after the 2019 Amendment, extension possible up to 60 days from creation = 31st July 2024
- 20th July 2024 falls within the 60-day window ✓
Answer: Registration is valid but ABC Pvt. Ltd. must pay additional fees for late filing. No further consequence.
---
Example 2 — Consequence of Non-Registration on Winding Up
XYZ Pvt. Ltd. borrowed ₹1,20,00,000 from Axis Bank on 1st March 2024, creating a charge on its warehouse. The charge was never registered with the ROC. XYZ Pvt. Ltd. goes into liquidation on 15th January 2025.
Working:
- Charge created: 1st March 2024
- Normal 30-day deadline: 31st March 2024 — missed
- Extended 60-day deadline: 30th April 2024 — missed
- Further 60 days (ad valorem): 30th June 2024 — also missed
- Result: Charge is void against liquidator and other creditors under Section 77(3)
- Axis Bank is treated as an unsecured creditor for the ₹1,20,00,000
Answer: Axis Bank loses its priority as a secured creditor and must compete with other unsecured creditors. However, Axis Bank can still claim ₹1,20,00,000 as a debt — the obligation to repay is NOT extinguished [Section 77(4)].
⚠️ Common exam mistakes
- Students confuse the timelines: Don't mix up the 30-day normal window, the 60-day extension, and the further 60-day ad valorem window. Memorize: 30 → 60 → 60 (for post-2019 charges). The ad valorem fees apply only in the last window.
- Thinking unregistered charge = loan is void: Wrong. Section 77(4) makes it clear the debt obligation survives. Only the security/priority is lost, not the right to recover the money.
- Forgetting that BOTH parties must sign: Students often write that only the company files. The particulars must be signed by both the company AND the charge-holder — if one is missing, registration is incomplete.
- Assuming registration is voluntary: It's a duty under Section 77(1), not an option. Failure attracts penalties and, more importantly, the charge becomes void against the liquidator. Don't present it as discretionary.
- Ignoring the Certificate of Registration: The section doesn't just require filing — the ROC must issue a Certificate of Registration under Section 77(2). Exam answers that stop at 'filing with ROC' miss this final step and lose marks.
📖 Bare Act text — Section 77, Companies Act 2013
(click to expand)
(1) It shall be the duty of every company creating a charge within or outside India, on its property or assets or any of its undertakings, whether tangible or otherwise, and situated in or outside India, to register the particulars of the charge signed by the company and the charge-holder together with the instruments, if any, creating such charge in such form, on payment of such fees and in such manner as may be prescribed, with the Registrar within thirty days of its creation: Provided that the Registrar may, on an application by the company, allow such registration to be made— (a) in case of charges created before the commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019, within a period of three hundred days of such creation; or (b) in case of charges created on or after the commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019, within a period of sixty days of such creation, on payment of such additional fees as may be prescribed: Provided further that if the registration is not made within the period specified— (a) in clause (a) to the first proviso, the registration of the charges shall be made within six months from the date of commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019, on payment of such additional fees as may be prescribed and different fees may be prescribed for different classes of companies; (b) in clause (b) to the first proviso, the Registrar may, on an application, allow such registration to be made within a further period of sixty days after payment of such ad valorem fees as may be prescribed. Provided also that any subsequent registration of a charge shall not prejudice any right acquired in respect of any property before the charge is actually registered: Provided also that this section shall not apply to such charges as may be prescribed in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India. (2) Where a charge is registered with the Registrar under sub-section (1), he shall issue a certificate of registration of such charge in such form and in such manner as may be prescribed to the company and, as the case may be, to the person in whose favour the charge is created. (3) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, no charge created by a company shall be taken into account by the liquidator appointed under this Act or the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as the case may be, or any other creditor unless it is duly registered under sub-section (1) and a certificate of registration of such charge is given by the Registrar under sub-section (2). (4) Nothing in sub-section (3) shall prejudice any contract or obligation for the repayment of the money secured by a charge.
Test yourself
Practice questions on this section, AI-graded with citations.
⚡ Practice now →