Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Past papers/ Corp Laws/ January 2026
Paper 20 Qs
Revision Test Paper (RTP) · January 2026

CA Inter Corp Laws

This page contains all 20 questions from the CA Inter Corporate & Other Laws Revision Test Paper (RTP) for the January 2026 attempt cycle, sourced from VSI Jaipur.

20 worked solutions ready
Sign up free to unlock every solution + bare-Act citations + how-to-write skeletons. 30 seconds, no card, no spam. Already signed up? Log in.
🎯 Practice this paper now

Drill 5 questions from this paper — instant grading

Real ICAI questions, instantly graded with bare-Act citations. ~5 minutes. No signup.

Drill 5 questions →
Q.1 00 marks hard Interim and final dividend declaration by Board of Directors ⚡ Try this Q →
Case: Netawal Heavy Industries Ltd. incorporated in April 2015, is a listed entity engaged in the business of manufacturing electrical vehicles of the latest design and technology. It is registered with an authorized share capital of ₹ 100 crore divided into 10 crore equity shares of ₹ 10 each. The paid up share capital of the company is ₹ 50 crore consisting 5 crore equity shares of ₹ 10 each. On 15th May 2024, i.e. after the close of financial year 2023-24 but before the Annual General Meeting (AGM), the Board declared an interim dividend of 10%. On 5th July, 2024 the Board of Directors of the co…
Since the Board of Directors (BoD) of the company has already declared interim dividend before the approval of financial book of accounts and closure of financial year whether the Board of Directors can declare the final dividend without approval of the shareholders?
(A) When the interim dividend has been declared by the BoD, later on, the final dividend cannot be declared by BoD.
(B) The BoD can recommend final dividend but approval of the shareholders is mandatory.
(C) The BoD can declare interim and recommend final dividend before holding of AGM for which approval of the shareholders is not required.
(D) Once the books of accounts have been approved by the BoD the final dividend may be declared but the final decision will be of shareholders in AGM where they can increase the dividend.
CTTP

Worked Solution

✓ Verified

Answer: (B)

Under the Companies Act, 2013, the Board of Directors has the power to declare interim dividend at any time during the financial year or even after the close of the financial year but before the AGM [Section 123(3)]. However, final dividend can only be recommended by the Board — it cannot be declared by the Board unilaterally. The final dividend must be approved (declared) by the shareholders in the Annual General Meeting under Section 123(1). Furthermore, as per the proviso to Section 123(1), the shareholders cannot declare a dividend higher than what the Board has recommended, but they may declare a lower amount. The company secretary's assertion in the case was therefore correct — shareholders cannot increase the dividend beyond the Board's recommendation, but they must approve it. Thus, Option (B) is correct: the BoD can recommend final dividend but approval of the shareholders is mandatory.

PLAN

Write it like this

Time target 5 min 24 sec

1The skeleton

- Hit Section 123(1) vs 123(3) in your first line — examiners award structure marks before they even read your reasoning, so naming both sub-sections upfront signals you know the bifurcation.
- State the interim dividend rule cleanly first — Board can declare interim dividend during the FY or after close of FY but before AGM under S.123(3); this sets the context for what the Board already did legally.
- Then pivot hard on 'recommend vs declare' — your answer lives or dies on this single word distinction: Board can only recommend final dividend, shareholders declare it in the AGM under S.123(1).
- Quote the proviso to S.123(1) explicitly — shareholders cannot declare a dividend exceeding the Board's recommendation; this validates the CS's assertion and is the crux of the scenario.
- Apply to facts in one sentence — tie the 15% Board recommendation and shareholders' demand for 10% extra directly to the proviso, showing you're answering the case, not reciting theory.
- End with a crisp conclusion — 'Thus, the Board cannot declare final dividend; shareholder approval in AGM is mandatory' — one line, no fluff, examiner can tick it immediately.

2Examiner-rewarded phrases

“the Board of Directors may recommend a final dividend out of the profits of the company, which shall be declared by the company in its Annual General Meeting”“as per the proviso to Section 123(1), the shareholders cannot declare a dividend exceeding the amount recommended by the Board of Directors”“the Board of Directors may declare an interim dividend during any financial year or at any time during the period from closure of the financial year till the holding of the AGM out of the surplus in the profit and loss account — Section 123(3)”

3Common trap

Don't fall for this

Watch out — most students write 'the Board declared the final dividend' when describing the facts, accidentally contradicting the very rule they're trying to state. The Board *recommends*, never *declares* final dividend; if you slip this word in your answer body, the examiner sees a conceptual error even if your conclusion is right.

🎯 Practice more Interim and final dividend declaration by Board questions →
Q.2 00 marks hard Quorum and shareholder approval of dividend rate in general ⚡ Try this Q →
Case: Netawal Heavy Industries Ltd. incorporated in April 2015, is a listed entity engaged in the business of manufacturing electrical vehicles of the latest design and technology. It is registered with an authorized share capital of ₹ 100 crore divided into 10 crore equity shares of ₹ 10 each. The paid up share capital of the company is ₹ 50 crore consisting 5 crore equity shares of ₹ 10 each. On 15th May 2024, i.e. after the close of financial year 2023-24 but before the Annual General Meeting (AGM), the Board declared an interim dividend of 10%. On 5th July, 2024 the Board of Directors of the co…
Once the rate of dividend has been recommended by the Board of Directors it cannot be increased, some of the shareholders walked out on this ground. Which procedure is correct among the following statement in this regard?
(A) Disregarding the boycott of some of the shareholders, if the Quorum is present during the course of general meeting and the majority of them have approved it then the rate of dividend recommended by the Board shall be treated as approved.
(B) The shareholders who attended the meeting but do not conform the quorum may also approve the rate of dividend recommended by the Board of Directors.
(C) If the final dividend is declared by the BoD, it need not to be approved by the shareholders in its general meeting.
(D) The recommendation of the BoD of the company relating to the rate of dividend shall stands withdrawn.
CTTP

Worked Solution

✓ Verified

Answer: (A)

Under the Companies Act, 2013, the declaration of final dividend requires approval of shareholders in the Annual General Meeting (AGM). The Board of Directors can only recommend the rate of dividend; they cannot increase it beyond the recommended rate, but shareholders also cannot increase the rate beyond what the Board has recommended — they may only approve or reduce it (Section 123 of the Companies Act, 2013).

When some dissenting shareholders walked out of the meeting in protest, their departure does not invalidate the proceedings provided the quorum remains intact. As per Section 103 of the Companies Act, 2013, for a public company, the quorum for a general meeting is 5 members personally present (for companies with members up to 1,000). Once quorum is confirmed at the commencement of the meeting, the meeting may proceed even if some members subsequently leave.

Therefore, disregarding the walkout of protesting shareholders, if the required quorum was present during the course of the general meeting and the majority of those present approved the rate of dividend as recommended by the Board of Directors, then the rate of dividend stands validly approved. Option (A) correctly captures this legal position.

Option (B) is incorrect because shareholders who do not form the required quorum cannot validly transact business. Option (C) is incorrect because final dividend declared by the Board requires shareholder approval in the AGM — the Board alone cannot declare final dividend. Option (D) is incorrect because the recommendation does not stand withdrawn merely due to shareholder protest; it stands approved once passed by the requisite majority with quorum.

PLAN

Write it like this

Time target 2 min

1The skeleton

- Lead with the legal anchor — write 'As per Section 123 of the Companies Act, 2013' in your very first line; examiners tick this before reading anything else.
- State the shareholder power limitation explicitly — you must write that shareholders can only approve or reduce the Board-recommended rate, never increase it; this single line is the core rule being tested.
- Handle the walkout separately with Section 103 — don't club quorum with dividend rate; carve out a distinct sub-point: 'As per Section 103, for a public company, quorum = 5 members personally present (up to 1,000 members).'
- Apply the quorum-continuity rule — state clearly that quorum is tested at commencement, not throughout; once satisfied, business transacted by remaining members is valid even if some leave.
- Conclude with a one-line verdict — 'Since quorum was intact and majority approved the Board-recommended rate, the dividend stands validly declared'; this closes the loop and earns the application mark.

2Examiner-rewarded phrases

“the shareholders in general meeting may declare a dividend not exceeding the amount recommended by the Board of Directors”“quorum once present at the commencement of the meeting shall not be affected by the subsequent departure of members”“as per Section 103 of the Companies Act, 2013, for a public company, the quorum shall be five members personally present”

3Common trap

Don't fall for this

Heads up — most students write 'shareholders approved the dividend' and move on, completely skipping the quorum-continuity rule; the walkout angle is a deliberate trap to see if you know that quorum is tested at commencement only, not continuously — missing this costs you the application marks even if your dividend rule is perfect.

🎯 Practice more Quorum and shareholder approval of dividend rate questions →
Q.3 00 marks hard Deadline for transfer of unpaid dividend to separate bank ac ⚡ Try this Q →
Case: Netawal Heavy Industries Ltd. incorporated in April 2015, is a listed entity engaged in the business of manufacturing electrical vehicles of the latest design and technology. It is registered with an authorized share capital of ₹ 100 crore divided into 10 crore equity shares of ₹ 10 each. The paid up share capital of the company is ₹ 50 crore consisting 5 crore equity shares of ₹ 10 each. On 15th May 2024, i.e. after the close of financial year 2023-24 but before the Annual General Meeting (AGM), the Board declared an interim dividend of 10%. On 5th July, 2024 the Board of Directors of the co…
When should the unpaid dividend, not claimed by the shareholders, be transferred to a separate bank account, as per the above case study?
(A) On 5th July, 2024 the date of meeting of BoD.
(B) On 31st August, 2024 the date of meeting of shareholders.
(C) On 30th September, 2024 the date after 30 days from the meeting of shareholders.
(D) Latest by 7th October, 2024, within seven days from the expiry of 30 days.
CTTP

Worked Solution

✓ Verified

Answer: (D)

As per Section 124(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, where a dividend has been declared by a company but has not been paid or claimed within 30 days from the date of its declaration, the company must, within 7 days from the expiry of the said 30-day period, transfer the total amount of unpaid or unclaimed dividend to a special account called the 'Unpaid Dividend Account' opened in a scheduled bank.

In the given case, the final dividend was declared at the AGM held on 31st August, 2024. The 30-day period from declaration expires on 30th September, 2024. The company must then transfer the unpaid dividend within 7 days from that date, i.e., latest by 7th October, 2024. The company transferred the unpaid dividend on 7th October, 2024, which is within the prescribed deadline. Hence, option (D) is correct.

PLAN

Write it like this

Time target 1 min 30 sec

1The skeleton

- Pin the section in your first line — write 'As per Section 124(1) of the Companies Act, 2013' before anything else; examiners are scanning for the statutory hook and you lose the benefit of doubt if it's buried.
- State the two-stage timeline as a formula — '30 days from declaration + 7 days from expiry of that 30-day period'; writing it as a formula makes it impossible for the examiner to miss your understanding of the rule.
- Identify the correct trigger date — the final dividend was declared at the AGM on 31st August 2024, NOT on 5th July when the Board recommended it; getting the trigger date right is where most marks are actually won or lost.
- Calculate and show both intermediate dates — 30th September 2024 (end of 30-day window) and then 7th October 2024 (end of 7-day transfer window); showing the chain of dates proves you applied the law, not just memorised it.
- Close with a verdict line — 'The company transferred the unpaid dividend on 7th October 2024, which is within the prescribed deadline, hence compliant'; the examiner wants a crisp conclusion, not an open-ended calculation.

2Examiner-rewarded phrases

“within 30 days from the date of declaration of dividend”“transfer the total amount of unpaid or unclaimed dividend to a special account called the 'Unpaid Dividend Account' opened in a scheduled bank”“within 7 days from the expiry of the said period of 30 days”

3Common trap

Don't fall for this

Heads up — the classic trap here is treating the Board recommendation date (5th July 2024) as the declaration date instead of the AGM date (31st August 2024). Declaration legally happens when shareholders pass the resolution at the AGM, not when the Board recommends it — get that wrong and your entire date chain shifts, and the answer flips.

🎯 Practice more Deadline for transfer of unpaid dividend to sepa questions →
Q.4 00 marks hard Interest liability for delayed transfer to unpaid dividend a ⚡ Try this Q →
Case: Netawal Heavy Industries Ltd. incorporated in April 2015, is a listed entity engaged in the business of manufacturing electrical vehicles of the latest design and technology. It is registered with an authorized share capital of ₹ 100 crore divided into 10 crore equity shares of ₹ 10 each. The paid up share capital of the company is ₹ 50 crore consisting 5 crore equity shares of ₹ 10 each. On 15th May 2024, i.e. after the close of financial year 2023-24 but before the Annual General Meeting (AGM), the Board declared an interim dividend of 10%. On 5th July, 2024 the Board of Directors of the co…
The amount of unpaid dividend was transferred to a separate bank account on 10th January 2025 which is beyond the prescribed period while the latest date to deposit in a separate bank account was 7th January, 2025. What will be the interest liability which is to be paid for this delay?
(A) Interest @ 6% per annum on so much of the amount not transferred to the unpaid dividend account.
(B) Interest @ 9% per annum on so much of the amount not transferred to the unpaid dividend account.
(C) Interest @ 12% per annum on so much of the amount not transferred to the unpaid dividend account.
(D) Interest @ 15% per annum on so much of the amount not transferred to the unpaid dividend account.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Interest liability for delayed transfer to unpaid dividend account
✓ 7-line worked answer · ✓ 1 bare-Act citation · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 1062 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.5 00 marks hard Transfer of unclaimed dividend to IEPF - applicable financia ⚡ Try this Q →
Case: Netawal Heavy Industries Ltd. incorporated in April 2015, is a listed entity engaged in the business of manufacturing electrical vehicles of the latest design and technology. It is registered with an authorized share capital of ₹ 100 crore divided into 10 crore equity shares of ₹ 10 each. The paid up share capital of the company is ₹ 50 crore consisting 5 crore equity shares of ₹ 10 each. On 15th May 2024, i.e. after the close of financial year 2023-24 but before the Annual General Meeting (AGM), the Board declared an interim dividend of 10%. On 5th July, 2024 the Board of Directors of the co…
When the company shall transfer the remaining unpaid or unclaimed dividend to the Investor Education and Protection Fund from the Unpaid Dividend Account?
(A) After the expiry of unpaid dividends for financial year 2017–18
(B) After the expiry of unpaid dividends for financial year 2016–17
(C) After the expiry of unpaid dividends for financial year 2018–19
(D) After the expiry of unpaid dividends for financial year 2019–20
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Transfer of unclaimed dividend to IEPF - applicable financial year
✓ 15-line worked answer · ✓ 2 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 1062 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.6 00 marks hard Shareholder's right to claim dividend transferred to IEPF ⚡ Try this Q →
Case: Netawal Heavy Industries Ltd. incorporated in April 2015, is a listed entity engaged in the business of manufacturing electrical vehicles of the latest design and technology. It is registered with an authorized share capital of ₹ 100 crore divided into 10 crore equity shares of ₹ 10 each. The paid up share capital of the company is ₹ 50 crore consisting 5 crore equity shares of ₹ 10 each. On 15th May 2024, i.e. after the close of financial year 2023-24 but before the Annual General Meeting (AGM), the Board declared an interim dividend of 10%. On 5th July, 2024 the Board of Directors of the co…
Ashwin, a shareholder holding 5,000 shares, discovered that the dividend for financial year 2016–17 had been transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund (IEPF). Which of the following statements is correct in this context?
(A) Ashwin can claim all the unpaid dividends from the company, including FY 2016–17, since he was unaware of the transfer.
(B) Ashwin cannot claim the dividend for FY 2016–17 from the company because it has been transferred to IEPF, but he can claim the remaining dividends (i.e. FY 2017–18 to 2023–24) from the company.
(C) Ashwin can file a suit to recover the dividend for FY 2016–17 from the company, and the company is liable to pay it.
(D) Ashwin cannot claim any dividend from the company until the next AGM approves a new resolution.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Shareholder's right to claim dividend transferred to IEPF
✓ 16-line worked answer · ✓ 2 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 1062 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.7 00 marks hard Register of Members - deadline for entry after Tribunal orde ⚡ Try this Q →
Case: Vedika Fashions Limited is a listed public company with a share capital of ₹ 10 crore, consisting of equity shares of ₹ 100 each. The company maintains the following registers: (a) Register of Members, showing separately each class of equity and preference shares held by members residing in or outside India. (b) Register of Debenture-holders. The registered office of the company is located in Bengaluru (Karnataka), while its corporate office is situated in Hyderabad (Telangana). Around 17% of equity shareholders and 10% of preference shareholders reside in Indore (Madhya Pradesh). Out of thes…
The Tribunal passed an order dated 20th May 2024. Latest by what date should the entry of Mr. Raj's name be made in the register of members?
(A) 25th May 2024
(B) 27th May 2024
(C) 30th May 2024
(D) 31st May 2024
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Register of Members - deadline for entry after Tribunal order
✓ 12-line worked answer · ✓ 1 bare-Act citation · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 1062 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.8 00 marks hard Signing of AGM report in absence of Chairman ⚡ Try this Q →
Case: Vedika Fashions Limited is a listed public company with a share capital of ₹ 10 crore, consisting of equity shares of ₹ 100 each. The company maintains the following registers: (a) Register of Members, showing separately each class of equity and preference shares held by members residing in or outside India. (b) Register of Debenture-holders. The registered office of the company is located in Bengaluru (Karnataka), while its corporate office is situated in Hyderabad (Telangana). Around 17% of equity shareholders and 10% of preference shareholders reside in Indore (Madhya Pradesh). Out of thes…
Suppose the Chairman of the company went abroad two days after the AGM and remained unavailable for the next 31 days. During this period, the AGM report was signed by two directors, one of whom was an additional director. Comment on the validity of the signing of the report.
(A) Yes, the signing is in order as the report can be signed by any director in the absence of the Chairman.
(B) No, the signing is not in order as only the Chairman is authorised to sign the report.
(C) Yes, the signing is in order, as in the absence of the Chairman, at least two directors may sign the report.
(D) No, the signing is not in order, since in the absence of the Chairman, the report shall be signed by any two directors, one of whom shall be the Managing Director, if there is one, and the Company Secretary of the company.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Signing of AGM report in absence of Chairman
✓ 21-line worked answer · ✓ 2 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 1062 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.9 00 marks hard Deadline for filing AGM report with Registrar in Form MGT-15 ⚡ Try this Q →
Case: Vedika Fashions Limited is a listed public company with a share capital of ₹ 10 crore, consisting of equity shares of ₹ 100 each. The company maintains the following registers: (a) Register of Members, showing separately each class of equity and preference shares held by members residing in or outside India. (b) Register of Debenture-holders. The registered office of the company is located in Bengaluru (Karnataka), while its corporate office is situated in Hyderabad (Telangana). Around 17% of equity shareholders and 10% of preference shareholders reside in Indore (Madhya Pradesh). Out of thes…
According to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, by what date should the company submit the AGM report to the Registrar?
(A) 4th June 2024
(B) 9th June 2024
(C) 24th June 2024
(D) 25th June 2024
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Deadline for filing AGM report with Registrar in Form MGT-15
✓ 6-line worked answer · ✓ 1 bare-Act citation · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 1062 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.10 00 marks easy Underwriting commission - limits and permissible sources of ⚡ Try this Q →
Which of the following statements is not true?
(A) In case of shares, the rate of underwriting commission to be paid shall not exceed five percent of the issue price of the share.
(B) Underwriting commission should not be more than the rate specified by the Article of Association.
(C) In case of debentures, the rate of underwriting commission shall not exceed five percent of the issue price of the debentures.
(D) Amount of commission may be paid out of profits of the company.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Underwriting commission - limits and permissible sources of payment
✓ 16-line worked answer · ✓ 2 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 1062 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.11 00 marks easy Revision of financial statements under section 131 of Compan ⚡ Try this Q →
In August 2025, Mr. Raj, a financial consultant to Bright Retail Ltd., advised the Board of directors of the company to revise its financial statements for the year 2022-23 after discovering that they did not comply with certain provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 relating to financial reporting. Examine, with reference to the applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, whether Bright Retail Ltd. can do so?
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Revision of financial statements under section 131 of Companies Act, 2013
✓ 34-line worked answer · ✓ 3 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 1062 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.12 00 marks easy Private placement by private company under section 42 of Com ⚡ Try this Q →
Gloria Tech Solutions Pvt. Ltd. is engaged in developing software products primarily for small and medium-sized enterprises. The company now plans to expand its operations to provide advanced enterprise software solutions to large corporate clients. For this expansion, the company requires funds of approximately ₹ 650 lakh. The promoters, however, prefer to retain control over the company and do not wish to convert it into a public company or raise funds through a public issue. Gloria Tech Solutions Pvt. Ltd. initially considered raising funds through a rights issue to existing shareholders but succeeded in generating only ₹ 150 lakh. Additionally, banks and financial institutions are hesitant to increase their exposure to the company. With reference to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, advise whether Gloria Tech Solutions Pvt. Ltd. can raise additional funds through a private placement. Also, state any limits on the amount of fresh offer.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Private placement by private company under section 42 of Companies Act, 2013
✓ 34-line worked answer · ✓ 3 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 1062 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.13 00 marks easy Remuneration of auditors under section 142 of Companies Act, ⚡ Try this Q →
Silverline Appliances Ltd. is engaged in the business of manufacturing high-quality kitchen appliances. They have a significant market presence for their products across India. The company appointed its statutory auditors for the financial year 2023-2024. The engagement letter with the auditors included a clause stating that the remuneration would be mutually decided. The directors of the company have approached you to seek advice on the provisions related to the remuneration of auditors as per the Companies Act, 2013.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Remuneration of auditors under section 142 of Companies Act, 2013
✓ 39-line worked answer · ✓ 3 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 1062 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.14 00 marks easy Definition and identification of foreign company under secti ⚡ Try this Q →
As per the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, define the term 'foreign company.' Based on this definition, determine which of the following companies would be categorized as a foreign company: | SI. No. | Place of Incorporation | Registered Place | Additional Information | |---|---|---|---| | 1 | Germany | Germany | Developed software for a clinic in Delhi; servers located in Germany. | | 2 | Canada | Canada | No branch or place of business in India, but has agents operating in India. | | 3 | Australia | Australia | Board meetings are conducted in Bengaluru, India. |
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Definition and identification of foreign company under section 2(42) of Companies Act, 2013
✓ 32-line worked answer · ✓ 1 bare-Act citation · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 1062 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.15 00 marks easy Private placement - maximum 200-person limit and exclusion o ⚡ Try this Q →
Devarshi Ltd. made a private placement of its securities during F.Y. 2023-24, by offering it, as follows: | Type of Security | Number of persons to whom securities offered | Remarks | |---|---|---| | Equity Shares | 210 | Out of such 160 persons, 20 persons are offered shares under employees' stock option. | | Debentures | 50 | Such debentures were secured against an immovable property of the company for which the charge-holders registered the charge on payment of fees to the Registrar. | As per the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, determine the maximum number of persons to whom Devarshi Ltd. could have offered its securities under private placement during the financial year 2023–24.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Private placement - maximum 200-person limit and exclusion of ESOP offerees
✓ 25-line worked answer · ✓ 5 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 1062 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.16 00 marks easy Registration of charge on working capital loan under section ⚡ Try this Q →
Chaman (Private) Limited on 3rd April 2024 obtained ₹ 30 lakh working capital loan by offering its Stock and Accounts Receivables as security from a financial institution.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Registration of charge on working capital loan under section 77 of Companies Act, 2013
✓ 34-line worked answer · ✓ 2 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 1062 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.17 00 marks easy Transfer of partner's share of profits and effect on disasso ⚡ Try this Q →
Raman, Sita and Mohan are partners in an LLP firm RSM & Co. engaged in consultancy services. As per the LLP agreement, profits and losses are shared equally. Raman, requiring funds for personal purposes, transfers 40% of his share of profits to his friend Arjun. After the transfer, Arjun claims that: (a) He is entitled to participate in the management of RSM & Co. (b) Since Raman has transferred part of his rights, he is deemed to be disassociated as a partner of the LLP. You are required to advise, with reference to the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008:
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Transfer of partner's share of profits and effect on disassociation under LLP Act, 2008
✓ 30-line worked answer · ✓ 4 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 1062 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.18 00 marks easy General Clauses Act section 8 - reference to repealed and re ⚡ Try this Q →
ABC Foundation, a non-profit company, was registered (in the year 2003) under section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956. As per section 2(18)(aa) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, 'a company is considered to be one in which the public are substantially interested if it is registered under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956.' After the enactment of the Companies Act, 2013, section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956 was replaced by section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013. However, the Income Tax Act, 1961 still continues to make reference of section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956 in section 2(18)(aa) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. In this situation, how should the reference to section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956, in section 2(18)(aa) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 be construed after the commencement of the Companies Act, 2013, in light of the provisions of the General Clauses Act, 1897?
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for General Clauses Act section 8 - reference to repealed and re-enacted provisions
✓ 35-line worked answer · ✓ 4 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 1062 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.19 00 marks easy Noscitur a sociis - interpretation of statutes ⚡ Try this Q →
"Associate words to be understood in common sense manner." Explain this statement with reference to rules of interpretation of statutes.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Noscitur a sociis - interpretation of statutes
✓ 64-line worked answer · ✓ 4 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 1062 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.20 00 marks easy FEMA - prior RBI approval threshold for remittance for consu ⚡ Try this Q →
Startech Pvt. Ltd., an Indian company, is planning to remit USD 12 million to a consultancy firm based in Germany for advisory services related to a new highway infrastructure project in India. The company has also engaged another foreign consultancy for a software upgrade on a different project and wants to remit USD 900,000 for that service. Both payments are to be made from India. With reference to the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, determine whether Startech Pvt. Ltd. can freely remit these amounts or if any approval is required for these transactions.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for FEMA - prior RBI approval threshold for remittance for consultancy services
✓ 49-line worked answer · ✓ 4 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 1062 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Start 15-min diagnostic