Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Past papers/ Corp Laws/ November 2015
Paper 28 Qs
Suggested Answers · November 2015

CA Inter Corp Laws

This page contains all 28 questions from the CA Inter Corporate & Other Laws Suggested Answers for the November 2015 attempt cycle, sourced from VSI Jaipur.

28 worked solutions ready
Sign up free to unlock every solution + bare-Act citations + how-to-write skeletons. 30 seconds, no card, no spam. Already signed up? Log in.
🎯 Practice this paper now

Drill 5 questions from this paper — instant grading

Real ICAI questions, instantly graded with bare-Act citations. ~5 minutes. No signup.

Drill 5 questions →
Q.1(a) 05 marks hard Surety - Discharge from Liability - Indian Contract Act, 187 ⚡ Try this Q →
Amit stands surety for 'Bikram' for any amount which 'Chander' may lend to 'Bikram' from time to time during the next three months subject to a maximum amount of ₹ 1,00,000 (one lakh only). One month later 'Amit' revokes the surety, when 'Chander' had already lent to 'Bikram' ₹ 10,000 (ten thousand). Referring to the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Decide:
CTTP

Worked Solution

✓ Verified

(i) Discharge from liability for subsequent loans:

The guarantee given by Amit is a continuing guarantee as defined under Section 129 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. A continuing guarantee is one which extends to a series of transactions. Here, Amit has guaranteed any amount Chander may lend to Bikram from time to time, subject to ₹1,00,000 — this squarely falls within the definition of a continuing guarantee.

Under Section 130 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a continuing guarantee may at any time be revoked by the surety as to future transactions, by giving notice to the creditor. Revocation operates only prospectively — it does not affect liability already incurred on past transactions.

In the given case, Amit revokes the surety one month later by (presumed) notice to Chander. At the time of revocation, Chander had already lent ₹10,000 to Bikram. Amit is discharged from all liability to Chander for any subsequent (future) loans given to Bikram after the notice of revocation. Chander cannot hold Amit responsible for any amount lent beyond ₹10,000.

(ii) Liability for the already borrowed ₹10,000 in case of default:

As established above, revocation under Section 130 only affects future transactions. The ₹10,000 already lent by Chander to Bikram is a past/completed transaction that occurred before Amit's revocation. Amit's guarantee for this amount had already crystallised at the time of lending.

Therefore, if Bikram makes a default in repaying the ₹10,000 already borrowed, Amit remains liable to Chander for ₹10,000. Revocation does not relieve Amit of the liability for transactions that had already taken place prior to the notice of revocation.

Conclusion: Amit is discharged only from liability for future loans post-revocation. He continues to be liable for the ₹10,000 already lent by Chander to Bikram before the revocation.

PLAN

Write it like this

Time target 9 min

1The skeleton

- Start by classifying the guarantee as 'continuing guarantee' under Section 129 — examiners are trained to look for this label in line 1; if you bury it, you lose the definitional mark even if your conclusion is correct.
- Quote Section 130 next and immediately add the word 'prospectively' — this single word is the hinge of the entire answer; it tells the examiner you understand WHY the two parts of the question have different outcomes.
- Split your answer into two numbered sub-parts matching the question — Part (i) future loans, Part (ii) ₹10,000 already lent — examiners award half marks per part, so a wall of text risks losing one part entirely.
- State the conclusion for each part in one crisp sentence with the rupee figure — 'Amit is discharged from liability for any amount lent after the notice of revocation' and 'Amit remains liable for ₹10,000 already lent' — named amounts signal precision and score the application mark.
- End with a two-line 'Conclusion:' paragraph — this is a 5-mark case scenario; examiners expect a formal closing that ties both parts together, and skipping it leaves your answer feeling incomplete.

2Examiner-rewarded phrases

“continuing guarantee as defined under Section 129 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which extends to a series of transactions”“a continuing guarantee may be revoked by the surety as to future transactions by giving notice to the creditor”“revocation operates prospectively and does not affect liability already incurred in respect of past transactions”

3Common trap

Don't fall for this

The single deadliest mistake here is saying Amit is discharged from ALL liability — including the ₹10,000 — because he 'revoked' the surety. That kills Part (ii) entirely and can cost you 2-3 marks. Revocation under Section 130 only kills future loans; the ₹10,000 already disbursed is locked in, and you must say so explicitly.

🎯 Practice more Surety - Discharge from Liability - Indian Contr questions →
Q.1(b) 05 marks hard Loan to Employees - Companies Act, 2013 ⚡ Try this Q →
MNO Private Limited, a subsidiary of PQR Limited, decides to give a loan of ₹ 4,00,000 to the HR (Human Resource) Manager, who is not a Key Managerial Personnel (KMP) of MNO Private Limited, drawing salary of ₹ 30,000 per month, to buy 500 partly paid-up Equity Shares of ₹ 1000 each in MNO Private Limited. Examine the validity of company's decision under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
CTTP

Worked Solution

✓ Verified

Relevant Provision — Section 67 of the Companies Act, 2013

Section 67(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 prohibits any company limited by shares from directly or indirectly giving a loan to any person if, without such loan, that person could not purchase or subscribe for shares in the company or its holding company.

However, Section 67(3)(c) carves out an exception permitting a company to give loans to its employees (other than directors or Key Managerial Personnel) for the purpose of enabling them to purchase or subscribe for fully paid-up shares in the company or its holding company, subject to the condition that the loan amount shall not exceed the employee's salary or wages for a period of six months.

Examining the Validity of MNO Private Limited's Decision

In the given case, MNO Private Limited proposes to give a loan of ₹4,00,000 to its HR Manager (who is admittedly not a KMP) to purchase 500 partly paid-up equity shares of ₹1,000 each in MNO itself. The HR Manager draws a monthly salary of ₹30,000.

The decision is invalid on two independent grounds:

Ground 1 — Shares are not fully paid-up: Section 67(3)(c) grants the exception only for loans given to enable an employee to purchase fully paid-up shares. In this case, the shares proposed to be purchased are partly paid-up equity shares. Since this fundamental condition is not met, the exception is not available and the loan falls within the general prohibition under Section 67(1).

Ground 2 — Loan exceeds six months' salary: Even if the shares were fully paid-up, the loan amount must not exceed the equivalent of six months' salary. The HR Manager's six months' salary amounts to ₹1,80,000 (₹30,000 × 6 months). The proposed loan of ₹4,00,000 exceeds this limit by ₹2,20,000. This is a violation of the monetary ceiling prescribed under Section 67(3)(c).

Conclusion: The decision of MNO Private Limited to grant a loan of ₹4,00,000 to the HR Manager for purchasing partly paid-up shares is not valid under the Companies Act, 2013. It violates Section 67(1) and does not qualify for the exception under Section 67(3)(c) on account of two distinct grounds — the shares being partly paid-up and the loan amount exceeding six months' salary of the employee.

PLAN

Write it like this

Time target 9 min

1The skeleton

- Lead with Section 67(1) in line 1 — examiners scan the opening for the section number; if it's buried, they assume you don't know the provision and you've already lost a mark before they read your analysis.
- State the exception under Section 67(3)(c) immediately after — don't just say 'there's an exception'; spell out BOTH conditions (fully paid-up shares AND six-months' salary cap) upfront, because the entire question is about those two conditions failing.
- Flag TWO independent grounds of invalidity as separate headed points — structure them as 'Ground 1' and 'Ground 2' so the examiner can tick each one; a wall of text mixing both grounds gets partial credit at best even if the logic is right.
- Show your six-months' salary calculation explicitly — write ₹30,000 × 6 = ₹1,80,000 and compare it to ₹4,00,000; examiners reward the arithmetic being visible, not assumed.
- End with a one-sentence conclusion that names the section and both grounds — the conclusion line is often where the 'presentation mark' sits; mirror the exact language of your grounds to show coherence and close the loop cleanly.

2Examiner-rewarded phrases

“the exception under Section 67(3)(c) is available only in respect of fully paid-up shares”“the loan amount shall not exceed the salary or wages of the employee for a period of six months”“the decision of the company is not valid under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013”

3Common trap

Don't fall for this

Watch out — most students identify ONE ground (usually the partly paid-up shares) and miss the salary-cap violation entirely, or vice versa. This question is specifically designed to test BOTH conditions, and the marks are split across them — writing only one ground will cost you at least 2 marks even if your section citation and conclusion are perfect.

🎯 Practice more Loan to Employees - Companies Act, 2013 questions →
Q.1(c) 05 marks medium Business Ethics ⚡ Try this Q →
State with reasons whether the following statements are correct or incorrect:
CTTP

Worked Solution

✓ Verified

Statement (i): Business Ethics helps to promote public reputation. — CORRECT

This statement is correct. Business ethics refers to the application of ethical values to business behaviour. It encompasses the conduct of individuals and the entire organisation. When a business consistently acts in an ethical manner — by being honest with customers, treating employees fairly, fulfilling obligations to suppliers, and contributing to societal welfare — it builds a positive public image and reputation.

The following reasons support this statement:

1. Consumer Trust: Ethical behaviour fosters trust among customers. Consumers prefer to deal with businesses that are known for honesty and fair practices, leading to customer loyalty and repeat business.

2. Employee Morale and Retention: Companies with strong ethical standards attract and retain talented employees who take pride in working for a reputable organisation. This in turn improves productivity and reduces attrition.

3. Investor Confidence: Ethical businesses attract long-term investors who prefer low-risk, stable organisations. A good ethical reputation reduces the risk of scandals or legal penalties that could erode investor value.

4. Avoiding Legal Consequences: Businesses that adhere to ethical norms are less likely to face regulatory actions, lawsuits, or penalties, all of which can damage public standing.

5. Goodwill and Brand Value: Consistent ethical conduct over time converts into goodwill, which is an intangible asset of immense commercial value. A strong ethical brand attracts business partners, suppliers, and collaborators.

Thus, business ethics and public reputation are directly and positively correlated. An ethical business earns the trust of all its stakeholders — customers, investors, employees, and the community — which collectively strengthens its public reputation.

---

Statement (ii): In the long-run, those business entities which respond to society's needs favourably will survive. — CORRECT

This statement is also correct. The concept of social responsiveness holds that businesses do not operate in isolation — they are part of a larger social system and depend on society for resources, customers, and their operating licence.

The following reasons justify this statement:

1. Mutual Dependence: Business and society are interdependent. A business that ignores social needs — such as environmental sustainability, community welfare, and fair employment — will eventually face public backlash, boycotts, and regulatory action that threaten its survival.

2. Long-Term Profitability: Responding to societal needs (e.g., producing eco-friendly products, supporting local communities) generates goodwill and customer loyalty, which translate into sustained long-term profits.

3. Regulatory and Legal Compliance: Governments increasingly mandate that businesses address social needs through laws on environmental protection, labour welfare, and consumer rights. Entities that proactively respond survive regulatory changes; those that resist face penalties or closure.

4. Changing Consumer Preferences: Modern consumers are socially conscious. They support businesses that contribute positively to society and shun those with poor social records. Businesses that adapt to these evolving preferences secure their market position in the long run.

5. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Entities that embed CSR into their core strategy — rather than treating it as an afterthought — are found to outperform peers over longer time horizons, as they build durable stakeholder relationships.

In conclusion, business entities that align their strategies with societal needs demonstrate resilience and adaptability, which are critical determinants of long-run survival and success.

PLAN

Write it like this

Time target 9 min

1The skeleton

- State 'CORRECT' or 'INCORRECT' in the very first line of each part — examiners tick this word first before reading anything else, so don't make them hunt for it.
- Give 1 crisp definitional line — anchor the answer with what the concept IS (e.g., 'Business ethics refers to application of ethical values to business behaviour') before you explain WHY, because examiners need to see you understand the premise.
- List 3–4 reasons with bold sub-headings (Consumer Trust, Goodwill, etc.) — this signals structure at a glance and lets the examiner award sub-marks quickly; prose paragraphs hide your points.
- Each reason = one sentence of fact + one sentence of consequence — don't just name the point, show the cause-effect chain (e.g., 'Ethical conduct builds trust → customers return → reputation grows'), because that's what earns the reasoning marks.
- End each part with a 1-line conclusion sentence — 'Thus, the statement is correct' closes the loop and signals completeness; skipping it feels like an unfinished answer even if the body is perfect.
- Divide your time equally between both statements — for 5 marks, each part is worth ~2–2.5 marks, so if you write 2 pages on (i) and 2 lines on (ii), you've already lost.

2Examiner-rewarded phrases

“Business ethics refers to the application of ethical values to business behaviour”“business and society are interdependent; a business that ignores social needs will face public backlash and regulatory action”“consistent ethical conduct converts into goodwill, which is an intangible asset of immense commercial value”

3Common trap

Don't fall for this

Heads up — most students write a long flowing paragraph for Statement (i) and then run out of time, giving only 2 lines to Statement (ii). The examiner splits marks across both parts, so an unbalanced answer kills you even if your content is right.

🎯 Practice more Business Ethics questions →
Q.1(d) 05 marks medium Communication - Oral vs Written ⚡ Try this Q →
State reasons for selecting oral mode of communications instead of written mode of communications.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Communication - Oral vs Written
✓ 45-line worked answer · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.2(a)(i) 04 marks medium Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 ⚡ Try this Q →
State with reasons whether the following persons are entitled to receive bonus under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965:
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Payment of Bonus Act, 1965
✓ 22-line worked answer · ✓ 3 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.2(a)(ii) 04 marks hard Payment of Gratuity Act, 1872 - Continuous Service ⚡ Try this Q →
Mr. X was an employee of Green Sugars Ltd. The whole of undertaking of Green Sugars Ltd. was takeover by a new company named Modern Sugars Ltd. The services of Mr. X remained continuous in the new company. After serving for one year Mr. X met with an accident and became permanently disabled. Mr. X applied to the new company for the payment of Gratuity. The new company refused to pay Gratuity on the ground that Mr. X has served only for a year in the new company. Examine the validity of the refusal of the company in the light of the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1872.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Payment of Gratuity Act, 1872 - Continuous Service
✓ 32-line worked answer · ✓ 3 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.3ai 04 marks medium Indian Contract Act - Performance of Contracts ⚡ Try this Q →
Under what circumstances the original contract need not be performed as stated under section 62 to 67 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872?
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Indian Contract Act - Performance of Contracts
✓ 40-line worked answer · ✓ 6 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.3aii 04 marks hard Contract Formation - Offer and Acceptance ⚡ Try this Q →
Mr. U offered to sell his house to Mr. X for ₹ 15,00,000. Mr. X accepted the offer by post. On the very next day Mr. X sent a telegram revoking the acceptance which reached Mr. U before the letter of acceptance. Is the revocation of acceptance valid? Would it make any difference if both the letter of acceptance and the telegram of revocation of acceptance reach Mr. U at the same time?
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Contract Formation - Offer and Acceptance
✓ 32-line worked answer · ✓ 2 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.3b 04 marks medium Ethics in Marketing ⚡ Try this Q →
Explain the pragmatic reasons for maintaining ethical behaviour in marketing through marketing executives.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Ethics in Marketing
✓ 40-line worked answer · ✓ 4 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.3bi 04 marks medium Ethics - Sources of Ethical Standards ⚡ Try this Q →
Explain any four sources of ethical standard.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Ethics - Sources of Ethical Standards
✓ 35-line worked answer · ✓ 4 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.3bii 04 marks medium Group Dynamics ⚡ Try this Q →
List out the characteristics of group personality under Group Dynamics.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Group Dynamics
✓ 27-line worked answer · ✓ 1 bare-Act citation · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.3c 04 marks medium Communication ⚡ Try this Q →
Write short notes on the following: (I) Proxemics (II) Haptics
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Communication
✓ 37-line worked answer · ✓ 3 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.4ai 04 marks medium Companies Act, 2013 - Prospectus ⚡ Try this Q →
Explain the concept of Deemed Prospectus under the Companies Act, 2013. Under what circumstances such prospectus need not be issued?
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Companies Act, 2013 - Prospectus
✓ 43-line worked answer · ✓ 3 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.4aii 04 marks medium Companies Act, 2013 - Capital Structure ⚡ Try this Q →
Diminution of share capital does not constitute a reduction within the meaning of Companies Act, 2013. State in what respects they differ from each other.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Companies Act, 2013 - Capital Structure
✓ 59-line worked answer · ✓ 3 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.4b 04 marks medium Critical Thinking ⚡ Try this Q →
What is meant by 'Critical thinking'? Suggest the measures to develop critical thinking.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Critical Thinking
✓ 39-line worked answer · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.4c 04 marks medium Business Communication ⚡ Try this Q →
Prepare a check list for organizing the messages in a business firm as a job of composing business messages being assigned to you.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Business Communication
✓ 45-line worked answer · ✓ 2 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.5ai 04 marks hard Negotiable Instruments Act - Cheque and Endorsement ⚡ Try this Q →
Mr. A is the payee of an order cheque. Mr. B steals the cheque and forges Mr. A signatures and endorses the cheque in his own favour. Mr. B then further endorses the cheque to Mr. C, who takes the cheque in good faith and for valuable consideration. Examine the validity of the cheque as per the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and also state whether Mr. C can claim the privileges of a Holder-in-Due course?
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Negotiable Instruments Act - Cheque and Endorsement
✓ 35-line worked answer · ✓ 2 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.5aii 04 marks medium Negotiable Instruments Act - Endorsement ⚡ Try this Q →
Explain the concept and different forms of Restrictive and Qualified endorsement.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Negotiable Instruments Act - Endorsement
✓ 41-line worked answer · ✓ 2 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.5b 04 marks hard Companies Act, 2013 - Issue of Shares ⚡ Try this Q →
Examine the validity of the following referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and/or Rules: "The Articles of Association of X Ltd. contained a provision that upto 4% of issue price of the shares may be paid as underwriting commission to the underwriters. The Board of Directors of X Ltd. decided to pay 5% underwriting commission."
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Companies Act, 2013 - Issue of Shares
✓ 29-line worked answer · ✓ 3 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.5b 04 marks medium Board meeting notice, share buy-back, director co-option ⚡ Try this Q →
Draft a notice for convening the Board of Directors Meeting of M/s. Growmore Limited where the agenda is to consider buy-back of company's equity share capital to an extent of 5% of its issued share capital and also where Mr. Anand is to be co-opted as an additional director.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Board meeting notice, share buy-back, director co-option
✓ 30-line worked answer · ✓ 7 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.5c 04 marks medium Ethics and Environment ⚡ Try this Q →
Discuss different environmental phenomena of ethical concern?
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Ethics and Environment
✓ 42-line worked answer · ✓ 4 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.5c 04 marks easy Company law, partnerships, resolutions, negotiable instrumen ⚡ Try this Q →
State whether the following statements are correct or incorrect:
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Company law, partnerships, resolutions, negotiable instruments
✓ 27-line worked answer · ✓ 4 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.6a 08 marks hard Companies Act, 2013 - Registered Office ⚡ Try this Q →
What is the importance of registered office of a company? State the procedure for shifting of a registered office of the company from one state to another state under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Companies Act, 2013 - Registered Office
✓ 72-line worked answer · ✓ 8 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.6c 04 marks medium Irregular allotment of shares ⚡ Try this Q →
When is an allotment of shares treated as an irregular allotment? Briefly state the effects of an irregular allotment.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Irregular allotment of shares
✓ 33-line worked answer · ✓ 2 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.6d 04 marks medium Employment discrimination ⚡ Try this Q →
Explain the practices widely recognized as discriminatory in employment.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Employment discrimination
✓ 35-line worked answer · ✓ 5 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.6e 04 marks medium Inter-personal communication ⚡ Try this Q →
What are the basic principles of inter-personal communication?
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Inter-personal communication
✓ 35-line worked answer · ✓ 2 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.7a 04 marks medium EPF Act 1952, employer-employee contributions ⚡ Try this Q →
State the provisions of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 regulating the quantum of contribution to be made by the employer and employee to the Provident Fund. Is it possible for an employee to increase the amount of his contribution to the Provident Fund more than the minimum contribution as statutorily prescribed?
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for EPF Act 1952, employer-employee contributions
✓ 31-line worked answer · ✓ 1 bare-Act citation · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.7b 04 marks medium Share transfer registration, Companies Act 2013 ⚡ Try this Q →
A company refuses to register transfer of shares made by Mr. X to Mr. Y. The company does not even send a notice of refusal to Mr. X or Mr. Y respectively within the prescribed period. Has the aggrieved party any right(s) against the company for such refusal? Advise as per the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for Share transfer registration, Companies Act 2013
✓ 35-line worked answer · ✓ 4 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 828 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Start 15-min diagnostic