Worked Solution
✓ VerifiedAnswer: (B)
The package consisting of stapler, calculator and charger supplied together at a single price of ₹300 constitutes a mixed supply under Section 2(74) of the CGST Act, 2017. A mixed supply is a combination of two or more individual supplies of goods or services made together for a single price, where such supply does not constitute a composite supply. Since none of these items (stapler, calculator, charger) is naturally bundled or ancillary to the other — they are independent goods — this is not a composite supply. Under Section 8(b) of the CGST Act, 2017, a mixed supply is taxed at the rate applicable to the supply attracting the highest rate of tax. Among the three goods, charger attracts the highest rate of 18% GST, so the entire package is taxable at 18%.
Write it like this
1The skeleton
- Name the supply type first — write 'Mixed Supply under Section 2(74) of the CGST Act, 2017' in your opening line, because examiners are scanning for the section number before they even read your reasoning.
- Eliminate composite supply in one line — state that no item is the principal supply nor ancillary to another, so Section 2(30) doesn't apply; this two-step elimination is what separates a 2/2 from a 1/2.
- Apply Section 8(b) explicitly — don't just say 'highest rate applies'; quote 'as per Section 8(b), a mixed supply shall be treated as supply of that particular supply which attracts the highest rate of tax' to lock in the second mark.
- Identify the highest rate and conclude — state charger @ 18% is the highest among 5%, 12%, 18%, therefore the entire package is taxed @ 18% GST; the conclusion must be a standalone sentence, not buried inside a paragraph.
2Examiner-rewarded phrases
3Common trap
Heads up — most students call it a 'composite supply' because the items are sold together, forgetting that composite supply needs a 'principal supply' with others being ancillary to it. Stapler, calculator, and charger are all independent goods — no principal exists — so calling it composite will flip your section reference and kill both marks even if your 18% conclusion is right.