Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Past papers/ Cost & Mgmt/ May 2023
Paper 7 Qs
Mock Test Paper (MTP) · May 2023

CA Inter Cost & Mgmt

This page contains all 7 questions from the CA Inter Cost & Management Accounting Mock Test Paper (MTP) for the May 2023 attempt cycle, sourced from VSI Jaipur.

7 worked solutions ready
Sign up free to unlock every solution + bare-Act citations + how-to-write skeletons. 30 seconds, no card, no spam. Already signed up? Log in.
🎯 Practice this paper now

Drill 5 questions from this paper — instant grading

Real ICAI questions, instantly graded with bare-Act citations. ~5 minutes. No signup.

Drill 5 questions →
Q.A-D1 14 marks very hard Income from profession - total income and tax liability comp ⚡ Try this Q →
Mr. Samar, a resident individual, aged 43 years, provides professional services in the field of interior decoration. His Income & Expenditure A/c for the year ended 31st March, 2023 is as under: Expenditure: Employees' Remuneration & Benefits ₹ 13,66,000; Office & Administrative Exp. ₹ 3,14,000; General Expenses ₹ 75,000; Electricity Expenses ₹ 65,000; Medical Expenses ₹ 80,000; Purchase of Furniture ₹ 48,000; Depreciation ₹ 90,000; Excess of income over expenditure ₹ 39,43,000. Total ₹ 59,81,000. Income: Consultancy Charges ₹ 58,80,000; Interest on Public Provident Fund (PPF) Account ₹ 60,000; Interest on Savings Bank Account ₹ 20,000; Interest on National Savings Certificates VIII Issue (for 3rd year) ₹ 21,000. Total ₹ 59,81,000. Additional information: (i) The expenses on Employees' Remuneration & Benefits includes: (a) Family Planning expenditure of ₹ 20,000 incurred for the employees which was revenue in nature, paid through account payee cheque. (b) Payment of salary of ₹ 25,000 per month to sister-in-law of Mr. Samar, who was in-charge of the Accounts & Receivables department. The reasonable salary at market rates is ₹ 20,000 per month. (ii) Employees' Contribution to EPF for the month of February, 2023 - ₹ 10,000 was deposited after the due date under the relevant Act relating to EPF. (iii) Medical Expenses of ₹ 80,000 were for treatment of father of Mr. Samar (aged 72 years, not covered by any health insurance policy). Payment made through account payee cheque. (iv) General expenses include ₹ 25,000 paid to Ms. Anjaleen on 5th January, 2023 as commission for securing work from new clients, without deduction of tax at source. (v) Written down value of depreciable assets as on 1st April, 2022: Professional Books ₹ 90,000; Computers ₹ 35,000. (vi) New Furniture purchased on 31st August, 2022 and put to use on the same day. Payment: ₹ 18,000 in cash on 31.08.2022; ₹ 19,000 by account payee cheque on 05.09.2022 as balance cost; ₹ 11,000 in cash on 31.08.2022 to transporter as freight charges. (vii) Mr. Samar purchased a car on 02.04.2021 for ₹ 3,35,000 for personal use. On 30.04.2022 he brought the said car for use in his profession. The fair market value of the car as on 30.04.2022 was ₹ 2,50,000. (viii) Mr. Samar made a contribution of ₹ 1,00,000 in his PPF A/c on 31.01.2023. (ix) The Gross Professional Receipts of Mr. Samar for P.Y. 2021-22 was ₹ 52,00,000. Compute the total income and tax liability of Mr. Samar for A.Y. 2023-24, assuming that he has not opted for payment of tax under section 115BAC. Ignore provisions under section 14A relating to disallowance of expenditure incurred in relation to income not includible in total income.
CTTP

Worked Solution

✓ Verified

Computation of Total Income and Tax Liability of Mr. Samar for A.Y. 2023-24

Note on Applicability of Presumptive Scheme: Mr. Samar's Gross Professional Receipts for P.Y. 2022-23 are ₹58,80,000, exceeding the ₹50,00,000 threshold under Section 44ADA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Hence, the presumptive scheme is not applicable and income is computed on regular basis from books.

---

A. Income from Profession

Net surplus as per Income & Expenditure Account: ₹39,43,000

Less: Non-professional income transferred to other heads:
— Interest on PPF (exempt u/s 10(11)): ₹60,000
— Interest on SB Account (other sources): ₹20,000
— Interest on NSC VIII Issue — 3rd year (other sources): ₹21,000
Adjusted surplus: ₹38,42,000

Add back disallowed expenses:
1. Medical Expenses ₹80,000 — Personal expenditure for father; not a professional expense (disallowed fully). Deduction available separately under Section 80D.
2. Excess Salary to sister-in-law ₹60,000 — Payment to a relative in excess of market rate is disallowed under Section 40A(2)(b). Excess = (₹25,000 − ₹20,000) × 12 months.
3. Employees' EPF Contribution deposited after due date ₹10,000 — Disallowed under Section 36(1)(va). The amended law does not allow deduction even on actual payment if deposited after the due date under the EPF Act.
4. Commission paid without TDS — 30% × ₹25,000 = ₹7,500 — Section 194H mandates TDS on commission exceeding ₹15,000. Payment of ₹25,000 without TDS triggers disallowance of 30% under Section 40(a)(ia).
5. Purchase of Furniture ₹48,000 — Capital expenditure; debited to I&E but not deductible as revenue expense. Added back; depreciation allowed separately.
6. Book Depreciation ₹90,000 — Replaced by depreciation computed under Section 32 read with Income Tax Rules.

Total disallowances: ₹2,95,500

Less: Depreciation as per Income Tax Act: ₹89,400 (see Working Notes)

Income from Profession: ₹38,42,000 + ₹2,95,500 − ₹89,400 = ₹40,48,100

Note: Family planning expenditure of ₹20,000 (revenue in nature, paid by cheque) is allowable under Section 37(1) for non-corporate assessees. No adjustment required.

---

B. Income from Other Sources

— Interest on SB Account: ₹20,000
— Interest on NSC VIII Issue (3rd year accrual, deemed reinvested, taxable on accrual basis): ₹21,000
Total: ₹41,000

---

C. Gross Total Income: ₹40,48,100 + ₹41,000 = ₹40,89,100

---

D. Deductions under Chapter VI-A

Section 80C — PPF contribution: ₹1,00,000 + NSC accrued interest (3rd year, deemed reinvestment in NSC): ₹21,000 = ₹1,21,000 (within ₹1,50,000 limit)

Section 80D — Medical expenditure for father (senior citizen, 72 years, not covered by any health insurance), payment through account payee cheque: ₹50,000 (actual ₹80,000, subject to maximum limit of ₹50,000 for senior citizen parent)

Section 80TTA — Interest on SB Account: ₹20,000, deduction limited to ₹10,000

Total Deductions: ₹1,81,000

---

E. Total Income: ₹40,89,100 − ₹1,81,000 = ₹39,08,100

---

F. Tax Liability Computation

Total Income: ₹39,08,100 (Mr. Samar, resident individual, 43 years, not opted for Section 115BAC)

SlabAmountRateTax
Up to ₹2,50,000₹2,50,000Nil
₹2,50,001 – ₹5,00,000₹2,50,0005%₹12,500
₹5,00,001 – ₹10,00,000₹5,00,00020%₹1,00,000
₹10,00,001 – ₹39,08,100₹29,08,10030%₹8,72,430

Tax before cess: ₹9,84,930
No surcharge (total income < ₹50,00,000). No rebate u/s 87A (total income > ₹5,00,000).

Add: Health & Education Cess @ 4%: ₹39,397

Total Tax Liability: ₹10,24,327, rounded to ₹10,24,330 (u/s 288B)

PLAN

Write it like this

Time target 25 min 12 sec

1The skeleton

- Kill §44ADA in line 1 — state gross receipts = ₹58.8L > ₹50L threshold, so presumptive scheme not applicable; examiners are trained to look for this gatekeeper before anything else, and skipping it signals you don't understand why you're doing regular computation.
- Anchor to net surplus, then strip non-professional income — open your profession workings with 'Net surplus as per I&E A/c: ₹39,43,000' and immediately deduct PPF/SB/NSC interest into their own heads; this shows the examiner you know the I&E is a mixed bag and you're cleaning it up methodically.
- Run disallowances as a numbered list with the section cited inline — write '₹10,000 disallowed u/s 36(1)(va)' not 'EPF was paid late so not allowed'; each disallowance without a section reference is half a mark gone, and the examiner's tick mark is literally looking for the section number.
- Carve depreciation into a working note — bring in car at lower of cost/FMV (₹2,50,000) for the block, apply 50% for computers since it's restricted, and show your block-wise table clearly; if you bury depreciation as one line '₹89,400' without a working, the examiner cannot award the sub-marks.
- Handle the NSC double-entry — 3rd-year NSC interest of ₹21,000 hits income from other sources AND feeds 80C as deemed reinvestment; write both explicitly because missing either half costs you a mark even if your total income is right.
- Close with a clean slab table + cess line — after deductions, confirm no surcharge (TI < ₹50L), no rebate u/s 87A (TI > ₹5L), add 4% cess separately, and round u/s 288B; examiners deduct marks for skipping the surcharge/rebate check even when the answer doesn't change.

2Examiner-rewarded phrases

“disallowed under section 40A(2)(b) to the extent payment to the relative exceeds the fair market value of the services”“employees' contribution to EPF deposited after the due date under the relevant Act is not deductible by virtue of section 36(1)(va)”“deduction under section 80D in respect of medical expenditure for a senior citizen parent not covered under any health insurance scheme is restricted to ₹50,000”

3Common trap

Don't fall for this

Heads up — the single deadliest move here is treating ₹80,000 medical expenses as fully disallowed in the profession workings AND then forgetting to claim 80D below; or worse, claiming 80D at the full ₹80,000 instead of the ₹50,000 senior-citizen cap. You lose marks on both sides of the paper if you miss the cap.

Q.1(v) 02 marks hard Tax liability computation - minimising tax for senior citize ⚡ Try this Q →
Case: Mr. Kamal, an Indian citizen, aged 61 years, has set-up his business in Canada and is residing in Canada since 2010. He owns a house property in Canada, half of which is used by him for his residence and half is given on rent (converted into INR is ₹ 12,00,000 p.a.). He purchased a flat in Delhi on 13.10.2020 for ₹ 42,00,000. The stamp duty value of the flat was ₹ 35,00,000. He has taken a loan from Canara Bank in India of ₹ 34,00,000 for purchase of this flat. The interest on such loan for the F.Y. 2022-23 was ₹ 3,14,000 and principal repayment was ₹ 80,000. Mr. Kamal has given this flat on m…
What would be the tax liability (computed in the manner so as to minimise his tax liability) of Mr. Kamal for the A.Y. 2023-24?
(A) ₹ 1,82,950
(B) ₹ 1,87,110
(C) ₹ 1,80,350
(D) ₹ 1,84,510
Get the worked solution + bare-Act citation for Tax liability computation - minimising tax for senior citizen RNOR
✓ 30-line worked answer · ✓ 9 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 778 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.2 02 marks easy Clubbing of income - spouse's business partly funded by husb ⚡ Try this Q →
Mrs. Archana, wife of Mr. Raj, started a business of trading in beauty products on 15.5.2022. She invested ₹ 5 lakhs in the business on 15.5.2022 out of gift received from her husband, Mr. Raj. She further invested ₹ 4 lakhs from her own savings on 15.12.2022. She earned profits of ₹ 1,50,000 from her business for the financial year 2022-23. Which of the following statements is correct?
(A) Share of profit of ₹ 1,50,000 is includible in the hands of Mrs. Archana.
(B) Share of profit of ₹ 66,667 is includible in the hands of Mr. Raj and share of profit of ₹ 83,333 is includible in the hands of Mrs. Archana.
(C) Share of profit of ₹ 83,333 is includible in the hands of Mr. Raj and share of profit of ₹ 66,667 is includible in the hands of Mrs. Archana.
(D) Share of profit of ₹ 1,50,000 is includible in the hands of Mr. Raj.
Get the worked solution + bare-Act citation for Clubbing of income - spouse's business partly funded by husband's gift
✓ 15-line worked answer · ✓ 2 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 778 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.3 02 marks easy TDS - interest under section 201(1A) for late deduction and ⚡ Try this Q →
An amount of ₹ 60,000 was paid to Mr. Samar on 1.7.2022 towards fees for professional services without deduction of tax at source. Subsequently, another payment of ₹ 75,000 was due to Mr. Samar on 28.02.2023, from which tax @10% (amounting to ₹ 13,500) on the entire amount of ₹ 1,35,000 was deducted and the net amount was paid on the same day to Mr. Samar. However, this tax of ₹ 13,500 was deposited only on 22.6.2023. The interest chargeable under section 201(1A) would be:
(A) ₹ 480
(B) ₹ 1,290
(C) ₹ 1,260
(D) ₹ 810
Get the worked solution + bare-Act citation for TDS - interest under section 201(1A) for late deduction and late deposit
✓ 15-line worked answer · ✓ 2 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 778 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.4 02 marks easy Partnership firm - taxable remuneration to working partner, ⚡ Try this Q →
Mr. C, aged 35 years, is a working partner in M/s BCD, a partnership firm, with equal profit sharing ratio. During the P.Y. 2022-23, the firm has paid remuneration to Mr. B, Mr. C and Mr. D, being the working partners of the firm, of ₹ 2,00,000 each. The firm has paid interest on capital of ₹ 1,20,000 in toto to all the three partners and the same is within the prescribed limit of 12%. The firm had a loss of ₹ 1,12,000 after debiting remuneration and interest on capital. Note – Remuneration and interest on capital is authorized by the partnership deed. You, being the CA of Mr. C, are in the process of computing his total income. What would be his taxable remuneration from the firm?
(A) ₹ 2,00,000
(B) ₹ 1,51,600
(C) ₹ 1,27,600
(D) ₹ 1,50,000
Get the worked solution + bare-Act citation for Partnership firm - taxable remuneration to working partner, limit u/s 40(b)
✓ 18-line worked answer · ✓ 1 bare-Act citation · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 778 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.5 01 marks easy Agricultural income - definition of rural agricultural land ⚡ Try this Q →
Income derived from farm building situated in the immediate vicinity of an agricultural land (not assessed to land revenue) would be treated as agricultural income if such land is situated in –
(A) an area at a distance of 3 kms from the local limits of a municipality and has a population of 80,000 as per last census
(B) an area within 1.5 kms from the local limits of a municipality and has a population of 12,000 as per last census
(C) an area within 2 kms from the local limits of a municipality and has a population of 11,00,000 as per last census
(D) an area within 8 kms from the local limits of a municipality and has a population of 10,50,000 as per last census
Get the worked solution + bare-Act citation for Agricultural income - definition of rural agricultural land
✓ 24-line worked answer · ✓ 2 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 778 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.6 01 marks easy HUF - coparcenary rights after Hindu Succession (Amendment) ⚡ Try this Q →
The Gupta HUF in Maharashtra comprises of Mr. Harsh Gupta, his wife Mrs. Nidhi Gupta, his son Mr. Deepak Gupta, his daughter-in-law Mrs. Deepti Gupta, his daughter Miss Preeti Gupta. Which of the members of the HUF are eligible for coparcenary rights?
(A) Only Mr. Harsh Gupta and Mr. Deepak Gupta
(B) Only Mr. Harsh Gupta, Mr. Deepak Gupta and Miss Preeti Gupta
(C) Only Mr. Harsh Gupta, Mr. Deepak Gupta, Mrs. Nidhi Gupta and Mrs. Deepti Gupta
(D) All the members are co-parceners
Get the worked solution + bare-Act citation for HUF - coparcenary rights after Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005
✓ 11-line worked answer · ✓ 1 bare-Act citation · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 778 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Start 15-min diagnostic