Worked Solution
✓ VerifiedAnswer: (D)
The avoidable cost till the factory becomes operative is ₹40,00,000.
In cost accounting, avoidable costs are those costs that would NOT be incurred if a particular decision or course of action is chosen. These are differential costs relevant to a specific decision.
Analyzing the case:
1. Historical and sunk costs (2012-2024): Land purchase (₹50,00,000), building construction (₹16,00,000), company setup (₹2,80,000), market survey (₹1,50,000), guard payments, and property tax are sunk costs and NOT avoidable as they are already incurred.
2. Current operational costs (Noida office): Staff salaries (₹30,00,000/year), electricity/maintenance (₹6,00,000/year), security (₹1,80,000/year), and departmental expenses (₹2,95,000/year) are committed costs for ongoing operations. These would be incurred regardless of the factory status.
3. Mr. Linde's personal salary (₹35,00,000/year): A committed cost for management and ownership.
4. Key avoidable item: The proposal to deploy an additional German manager at ₹20,00,000/year is explicitly noted as "opposed by German management." This is a discretionary cost that can be completely avoided by management decision without affecting core business operations.
5. Capital items: Manesar land (₹1.50 crores), factory construction by SPV/REIT (₹85 lacs/year), and building purchase (₹3.75 crores) are strategic capital investments, not operational costs for this avoidable cost analysis.
Since the factory becomes operative in 2 years (construction period by SPV/REIT), the avoidable cost is the discretionary additional manager salary for the 2-year period = ₹20,00,000/year × 2 years = ₹40,00,000. This cost can be completely eliminated without compromising business operations during the factory construction period.
Write it like this
1The skeleton
- Lead with your classification framework — write one line defining avoidable cost as 'a cost that would NOT be incurred if a specific decision is not taken', because examiners award the definition mark before they even read your workings.
- Sweep every cost into Sunk / Committed / Discretionary buckets first — list 2012-2024 historical costs, current Noida operational costs, and Mr. Linde's salary as committed/sunk so the examiner sees you deliberately ruling them out, not ignoring them.
- Spotlight the ONE trigger phrase in the question — 'opposed by German management' is your examiner-planted signal; quote it back verbatim to show you caught it, because that phrase is WHY the German manager cost is discretionary and avoidable.
- Show the 2-year multiplication explicitly — write ₹20,00,000 × 2 years = ₹40,00,000 as a separate line, not buried in prose; marks are allocated to the computation step, not just the final number.
- End with a one-line conclusion restating the question's language — 'Hence, avoidable cost till the factory becomes operative = ₹40,00,000' mirrors the question wording and signals a clean close to the examiner scanning for your answer.
2Examiner-rewarded phrases
3Common trap
Heads up — most students panic-list every number in the question (land, construction, salaries, everything) trying to show 'analysis', but that actually loses marks because you look like you don't know what avoidable means. The question has exactly ONE avoidable item; your job is to rule everything else OUT with a reason, then isolate the manager cost and multiply by 2 years.