CA
Tax Tutor
A

When a factory runs a production process, sometimes you get more than one output — and not all of them are equally important. The main product is the star of the show. By-products are the supporting cast — they emerge incidentally, have relatively small commercial value, but are still saleable. Think molasses from a sugar mill, sawdust from a timber yard, or glycerine from soap manufacturing. The core question in exams: how do you treat the sale proceeds (or value) of that by-product when calculating the cost of the main product?

The ICAI curriculum gives you two broad approaches. The first is the Non-Cost Method — you don't assign any process cost to the by-product at all. Within this, the most exam-relevant treatment is the Net Realisable Value (NRV) deduction method: you calculate the NRV of the by-product (selling price minus any further processing/selling costs after the split-off point) and deduct it from the total process cost before computing the main product's cost. Alternatively, sale proceeds can be shown as Other Income (miscellaneous income) in the P&L — simpler, but less common in numerical questions. The second approach is the Cost Method, where a share of joint/process cost is actually allocated to the by-product using standard cost or reversal cost techniques — rarely tested at CA Inter level, so don't panic about it.

For exam purposes, the NRV deduction method is the default. Remember the logic: the by-product is helping 'subsidise' the process — its recoverable value reduces the burden on the main product. The split-off point (the stage where the by-product separates from the main product) is critical — costs after split-off (like refining or packing the by-product) are subtracted when computing NRV, not before. This topic pairs naturally with Joint Product Costing; the only practical difference is that by-products get the NRV treatment while joint products need a proper apportionment method (physical units, sales value, etc.). This concept is asked frequently as a 5–8 mark numerical in the Process Costing section — usually embedded inside a full process account.

📊 Worked example

Example 1 — NRV Deduction Method

Rajesh Chemicals produces Chemical X (main product) and a by-product Y in a single process.

| Item | Amount |

|---|---|

| Total Process Cost | ₹6,00,000 |

| Output of Chemical X | 900 kg |

| Output of By-product Y | 200 kg |

| Selling price of Y | ₹25 per kg |

| Selling expenses for Y | ₹5 per kg |

Step 1 — Compute NRV of By-product Y:

NRV = 200 × (₹25 − ₹5) = 200 × ₹20 = ₹4,000

Step 2 — Net Process Cost to be borne by main product X:

Net Cost = ₹6,00,000 − ₹4,000 = ₹5,96,000

Step 3 — Cost per kg of Chemical X:

Cost per kg = ₹5,96,000 ÷ 900 = ₹662.22 per kg

---

Example 2 — By-product needs further processing after split-off

Ms. Iyer's soap factory produces Soap Bars (main) and Glycerine (by-product). Total joint process cost = ₹12,50,000. Glycerine output = 500 litres. After split-off, glycerine needs ₹8 per litre of refining cost. It sells at ₹60 per litre. Selling commission = 10% of selling price.

Step 1 — NRV of Glycerine:

  • Selling price: ₹60
  • Less: Refining cost: ₹8
  • Less: Commission (10% of ₹60): ₹6
  • NRV per litre: ₹46
  • Total NRV = 500 × ₹46 = ₹23,000

Step 2 — Net cost allocated to Soap Bars:

₹12,50,000 − ₹23,000 = ₹12,27,000

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Confusing by-products with scrap/waste. Scrap has negligible value and is usually treated differently (credited to process account at scrap value). By-products have meaningful market value and need proper NRV treatment — don't use the same shortcut for both.
  • Forgetting to deduct post-split-off costs when computing NRV. Students often take the full selling price as NRV. You must subtract any further processing costs AND selling/distribution costs incurred after the split-off point.
  • Treating by-product proceeds as 'Other Income' in a numerical when the question clearly implies NRV deduction. Read the question carefully — if it gives you per-unit selling price and costs, they want NRV deduction from process cost, not Other Income treatment.
  • Mixing up by-products and joint products. If two outputs are of similar importance (like petrol and diesel), they're joint products needing an apportionment method. By-products are clearly secondary/minor — don't apportion joint costs to them at CA Inter level.
  • Including pre-split-off costs when computing the by-product's NRV. Pre-split-off costs are joint costs borne by the whole process. Only post-split-off costs specific to the by-product are deducted from its selling price to get NRV.
📖 Reference: By-Products — Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
Test yourself
Practice questions on this section, AI-graded with citations.
⚡ Practice now →