Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

Failure to Comply (Sections 392 and 393)

# Company's Failure to Comply with Provisions of this Chapter [Sections 392 and 393]

## Punishment for Contravention

### On the Foreign Company

  • Fine: ₹ 1 lakh, extendable up to ₹ 3 lakhs
  • For continuing offence: Additional fine up to ₹ 50,000 per day after the first day during which the contravention continues.

### On Officer in Default

  • Fine: ₹ 25,000, extendable up to ₹ 5 lakhs.

## Effect of Contravention

### Validity of Contracts

  • Contravention does not affect the validity of any contract, dealing or transaction entered into by the company.
  • The company's liability to be sued continues.

### Disability to Initiate Proceedings

The non-compliant foreign company cannot:

  • Bring a suit
  • Claim set-off
  • Make a counter-claim
  • Institute legal proceedings

…for any contract, dealing, or transaction, until it complies with the applicable provisions.

## Investigation if Not Registered

If a person carries on business as a foreign company without getting registered as a foreign company, he shall be liable for investigation under Section 210 and consequent action.

## Practical Implication

Non-compliance creates a one-way disability — the foreign company can still be sued but cannot itself sue. This is a strong commercial incentive to comply.

Worked example

### Example 1

Example 1: A foreign company failed to file its FS for two years. A buyer in India defaulted on payment. The foreign company cannot file a recovery suit in Indian courts until it complies with the Chapter XXII requirements. However, if the buyer sues the foreign company, the court will entertain such suit against the company.

### Example 2

Example 2: A Japanese trading firm carried on business in Mumbai for 3 years without registering as a foreign company. It is liable to investigation under Section 210 of the Companies Act, 2013.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Believing non-compliance voids all transactions — it does not affect contract validity.
  • Assuming the disability is mutual — the foreign company cannot sue, but it can be sued.
  • Confusing the daily continuing fine (₹50,000/day) with a one-time penalty.
Reference: Sections 392 and 393 — Companies Act, 2013
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic