# FEMA vs FERA — Comparison
## Background Timeline
| Year | Statute |
|---|---|
| 1947 | FERA, 1947 (first foreign exchange regulation post-Independence) |
| 1973 | FERA, 1973 (replaced 1947 Act; stricter) |
| 1999 | FEMA, 1999 (replaced FERA, 1973; liberalised approach) |
## Point-wise Comparison
| # | Point | FERA, 1973 | FEMA, 1999 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Objective | To conserve foreign exchange | To promote and develop the forex market |
| 2 | Residential Status | Based on citizenship | Based on stay in India (number of days) |
| 3 | Strictness | Forex transactions prohibited unless specifically permitted | Forex transactions permitted unless specifically restricted |
| 4 | Mens Rea (guilty mind) | Presumed — the accused had to disprove guilty intent | Not presumed — prosecution must prove mens rea |
| 5 | Compounding of Offences | Not allowed | All offences are compoundable |
## Mnemonic / Trick
FEMA flips FERA on every count: promote (not conserve), stay (not citizenship), permitted-unless-restricted (not prohibited-unless-permitted), no presumption of guilt, and compounding allowed.