# Remedies against the Company for Misrepresentation in Prospectus
## Setting
If a prospectus contains an untrue or misleading statement and a person subscribes shares relying on it, that person (the allottee) has three civil remedies against the company plus rights against directors/promoters/experts (covered separately).
## Remedies against the COMPANY
### 1. Rescind the contract of allotment
The allottee may apply to the Court to:
- have the allotment contract set aside, and
- get the name struck off the register of members.
### 2. Claim refund of money
Upon rescission, the allottee may claim his money back.
### 3. Sue the company for damages for deceit
The allottee may sue for damages, in addition to or instead of rescission, where the misrepresentation amounts to deceit.
## Conditions / Limitations
### Act within reasonable time
The allottee must rescind:
- within a reasonable time, AND
- before any winding-up proceedings have commenced.
### Loss of right to rescind
The right is lost (i.e., conduct evidencing affirmation) if the allottee:
- Attempts to sell the shares, OR
- Attends a general meeting of the company, OR
- Receives dividends.
### Only direct subscribers can sue
- Available only to persons who subscribed the shares.
- "Subscribed" = acquired directly from the company by allotment.
- A subsequent purchaser in the open market has no remedy against the company, directors, or promoters under prospectus liability.
## Logic Behind the Restriction
Prospectus liability exists because the prospectus induced the first allotment. Once shares are traded in the secondary market, the inducement chain is broken — secondary buyers rely on market price, not the prospectus.