## Ethical Requirements, Professional Skepticism, and Professional Judgement
### Ethical Requirements
An auditor conducting an audit of financial statements must comply with the following ethical requirements:
1. Integrity — straightforward and honest
2. Objectivity — free from bias and conflicts of interest
3. Professional competence and due care — maintain knowledge and skill; act diligently
4. Confidentiality — do not disclose information without authority or legal right
5. Professional behaviour — comply with laws; avoid actions that discredit the profession
Independence is a sub-element of objectivity and has two dimensions:
- Independence of mind — actual freedom from bias
- Independence of appearance — perceived freedom from bias by a reasonable third party
---
### Professional Skepticism
Definition: Having a questioning and alert mind — not assuming that management is dishonest or honest, but maintaining a questioning attitude.
Professional skepticism involves being alert to:
- (a) Fraud Risk Factors — conditions indicating possible fraud
- (b) Contradictory audit evidence — evidence that conflicts with other evidence obtained
- (c) Reliability of documents — questioning whether documents may be forged or incomplete
> Exam signal: Professional skepticism is NOT suspicion. It is a questioning mindset. The auditor neither assumes wrongdoing nor accepts everything at face value.
---
### Professional Judgement
Definition: The application of relevant training, knowledge and experience in making informed decisions about the appropriate courses of action in the audit.
Professional judgement is required throughout the audit — in planning, risk assessment, designing procedures, and forming conclusions.
| Concept | Key Phrase | Practical Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Professional Skepticism | Questioning and alert mind | Alert to fraud indicators, contradictions, document reliability |
| Professional Judgement | Training, knowledge, experience | Making informed decisions on appropriate courses of action |