## Audit Evidence (SA 500)
### What is Audit Evidence?
Audit evidence is the information used by the auditor to arrive at conclusions on which the audit opinion is based.
### Two Quality Dimensions of Evidence
| Dimension | What It Measures | Depends On |
|---|---|---|
| Appropriateness | Quality of evidence | Relevance + Reliability |
| Sufficiency | Quantity of evidence | ROMM assessment + Quality of evidence |
> These two dimensions are interdependent: poor quality evidence requires more quantity to compensate, but quantity alone can never fix fundamentally unreliable evidence.
### Relevance
Evidence is relevant when it has a logical connection between:
1. The purpose of the audit procedure, and
2. The assertion under consideration.
Ask: Does this piece of evidence actually test the assertion I am trying to test?
### Reliability Hierarchy (Higher → Lower)
1. External > Internal evidence
2. Direct > Indirect evidence
3. Documentary > Oral evidence
4. Original > Photocopied documents
5. Evidence is more reliable when internal financial controls are effective
### Audit Procedures – Six Ways to Gather Evidence
| Procedure | Core Idea |
|---|---|
| Inspection | Examining records, documents, or tangible assets (3 tiers: 3rd-party held, 3rd-party created + entity-held, entity-created + entity-held) |
| Observation | Watching a process performed by others (e.g., auditor observes client's inventory count) |
| Inquiry | Seeking information from knowledgeable persons inside or outside the entity |
| Confirmation | Written response corroborating information in the accounting records |
| Analytical Review | Studying ratios/trends and investigating unusual fluctuations |
| Recalculation | Checking mathematical accuracy (manual or electronic) |
| Re-performance | Auditor independently re-executes the entity's own controls/procedures |
### Using an Expert's Work as Evidence
Step 1 – Evaluate CCO: Competence, Capabilities, and Objectivity of the expert.
Step 2 – Understand their work.
Step 3 – Evaluate appropriateness, considering:
- Relevance and reasonableness of findings/conclusions, consistency with other evidence
- Appropriateness of significant assumptions and methods
- Relevance, completeness, and accuracy of source data used