## Results of External Confirmation Procedures
### Reliability of Responses
| Situation | Auditor's Action |
|---|---|
| Doubts about reliability of a response | Obtain further audit evidence to resolve those doubts |
| Response determined to be not reliable | Evaluate implications on the Risk of Material Misstatement (ROMM) assessment |
---
### Negative Confirmations — When Permitted
Negative confirmations provide less persuasive audit evidence than positive confirmations.
Negative confirmations cannot be used as the sole substantive procedure for an assertion unless ALL FOUR conditions are met:
1. Low ROMM: Auditor has assessed ROMM as low AND obtained sufficient appropriate evidence on the operating effectiveness of controls relevant to the assertion.
2. Large, homogeneous population: Large number of small, homogeneous account balances, transactions, or conditions.
3. Very low exception rate expected: Based on prior experience or other evidence.
4. Recipients unlikely to disregard: Auditor is not aware of circumstances that would cause recipients to ignore the request.
> Memory aid: L-H-L-R — Low ROMM, Homogeneous population, Low exception rate expected, Recipients unlikely to disregard.