## GE Nine-Cell Matrix (GE–McKinsey Matrix)
The GE Matrix evaluates business units on two composite factors, making it more nuanced than the BCG matrix's single-metric axes.
### Two Dimensions
1. Industry Attractiveness — composite score based on: market size, growth rate, profitability, competition intensity, technological requirements
2. Business Unit Strength — composite score based on: market share, brand strength, production capacity, profit margins, technological capability
### Nine-Cell Grid (3 × 3)
| Strong Business | Average Business | Weak Business | |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Attractiveness | Invest/Grow | Invest/Grow | Selectivity |
| Medium Attractiveness | Invest/Grow | Selectivity | Harvest/Divest |
| Low Attractiveness | Selectivity | Harvest/Divest | Harvest/Divest |
### Three Strategic Zones
- Green Zone (Invest/Grow): High attractiveness + Strong position → "Go ahead" for investment
- Yellow Zone (Selectivity): Mixed conditions → selective, cautious investment
- Red Zone (Harvest/Divest): Low attractiveness + Weak position → "Be careful"; minimise investment
### GE Matrix vs. BCG Matrix
| Feature | BCG Matrix | GE Matrix |
|---|---|---|
| Cells | 4 quadrants | 9 cells |
| Axes | Single metrics (market share + growth rate) | Composite scores |
| Scope | Simpler; product/SBU focus | More comprehensive |
| Decision output | Stars / Cash Cows / Question Marks / Dogs | Invest / Hold / Harvest zones |