## Significance of Dividend Policy

Dividend policy is significant because it operates at the intersection of two critical decisions: how to finance the firm and how to maximise shareholder wealth.

---

### 1. Dividend Policy as a Long-Term Financing Decision

Equity can be raised in two ways:

Source	Cost	Dilution
Issuing new shares (external equity)	Higher (floatation costs: printing, marketing, underwriting)	Yes—new shareholders dilute control
Retaining profits (internal equity)	Lower (no floatation cost)	No

The retention-dividend trade-off:

> If the company pays more dividends → less internal funds → may need costly external equity

Decision rule for retention vs. distribution:

If ROI > Ke (return on investment > shareholder's required return) → Retain profits (reinvestment earns more than shareholders expect)
If ROI < Ke → Distribute as dividend (shareholders can earn more by reinvesting the dividend themselves)

---

### 2. Dividend Policy as a Wealth Maximisation Decision

The Market Price of Share (MPS) is directly influenced by the Dividend Payout Ratio:

```

High Payout → MPS ↑ (investors get immediate return; uncertainty resolved)

Low Payout → MPS ↓ (investors uncertain about future returns)

```

Why shareholders prefer current dividends:

Future is uncertain—'a bird in hand is worth two in the bush' (basis of Gordon's Model).
If retained earnings are reinvested wisely → future EPS ↑ → MPS ↑ ✓
If reinvested poorly → EPS ↓ → MPS ↓ ✗

---

### 3. The Balance Required

Management must optimally split PAT between:

Dividends today (satisfies current shareholders)
Retained earnings for growth (builds future value)

The goal: maximise shareholder wealth through the right dividend-retention mix.

> Exam formula linkage:

> Walter's Model: P = (D + r/Ke × (E−D)) / Ke

> Gordon's Model: P₀ = E(1−b) / (Ke − br)

> (where b = retention ratio, r = ROI, Ke = cost of equity)

Worked example

### Example 1

Firm A earns ROI = 18%; Ke = 12%. Since ROI > Ke, retained earnings create more value than distributing them. If the firm pays ₹5 as dividend instead of retaining, the opportunity cost is the 6% excess return foregone. Policy: retain more, pay less dividend.

### Example 2

Firm B earns ROI = 9%; Ke = 12%. Since ROI < Ke, shareholders can earn 12% by reinvesting dividends but the firm only earns 9%. Policy: pay out more dividend—shareholders are better off deploying the cash themselves.

### Example 3

Company C has a payout ratio of 20% (retains 80%). Its share price is ₹45. It increases payout to 60%—share price rises to ₹62 because investors now receive immediate, certain cash, reducing uncertainty-related discount.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

Assuming high retention always increases share price—this is only true if ROI > Ke; if ROI < Ke, retention destroys value.
Treating floatation costs as negligible—they are a real and significant reason why internal equity (retention) is cheaper than external equity.
Ignoring that dividend policy affects not just payout but also the firm's future financing choices—cutting dividends may force costly external financing later.
Confusing payout ratio (D/E) with dividend yield (D/P)—payout ratio compares dividend to earnings; yield compares dividend to market price.

Reference:

Now that you've read this — what's next?

Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.

🔥 Drill 5 Qs on this → ✍️ Adaptive practice →