# Profit Maximisation vs Wealth Maximisation
## The Two Stated Objectives
### (i) Profit Maximisation
Traditionally, the primary objective of a company is said to be earning profit, so financial management should aim at profit maximisation. Profit here is measured as the total accounting profit available to shareholders.
### (ii) Wealth / Value Maximisation
Shareholders' wealth is the result of a cost-benefit analysis adjusted for timing and risk — i.e., the time value of money.
$$\text{Wealth} = \text{PV of benefits} - \text{PV of costs}$$
Wealth maximisation focuses on the market price of the firm's stock — the focal judgment of all market participants about the firm's value, considering present and future EPS, timing, risk, dividend policy and other factors.
## Conflicts Between the Two
Profit maximisation is a short-term, limited objective and cannot be the sole goal because:
1. The term profit is vague — short term or long term? Before or after tax? Total or per share?
2. It must be attempted with awareness of the risk involved — high profits often involve high risk.
3. It ignores the time pattern of returns — does not distinguish ₹100 today from ₹100 in 10 years.
4. It is too narrow — ignores social obligations, workers, consumers, ethical practices.
Wealth maximisation, in contrast, encourages efficient use of resources, cost reduction, and policies that promote long-term value.
## Why Wealth Maximisation is Superior
1. Considers all future cash flows — dividends, EPS, and risk of decisions. Profit maximisation does not consider EPS, dividends, or shareholder returns.
2. A firm pursuing wealth maximisation may pay regular dividends; a profit-maximising firm may withhold them.
3. Shareholders prefer increases in wealth over a mere increase in accounting profit.
4. The market price of a share captures expected returns, timing differences, risk and distribution policy.
Profit maximisation can therefore be viewed as a part of the broader wealth-maximisation strategy — not the sole criterion.
## Why Profit Maximisation is Not an 'Operationally Feasible' Criterion
It fails as a working criterion for ranking alternative courses of action because:
- Vague term — multiple interpretations of 'profit'.
- Ignores timing of returns — no consideration of time value of money.
- Ignores risk.
- 'Maximisation' itself is vague.
## Quick Comparison
| Aspect | Profit Maximisation | Wealth Maximisation |
|---|---|---|
| Time horizon | Short term | Long term |
| Time value of money | Ignored | Considered |
| Risk | Ignored | Considered |
| Measure | Accounting profit | Market price of share |
| Stakeholders | Narrow — owners' profit | Broader — owners' long-term value, dividends, risk |