Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Past papers/ Audit & Ethics/ November 2011
Paper 4 Qs
Question Paper · November 2011

CA Inter Audit & Ethics

This page contains all 4 questions from the CA Inter Auditing & Ethics Question Paper for the November 2011 attempt cycle, sourced from VSI Jaipur.

4 worked solutions ready
Sign up free to unlock every solution + bare-Act citations + how-to-write skeletons. 30 seconds, no card, no spam. Already signed up? Log in.
🎯 Practice this paper now

Drill 5 questions from this paper — instant grading

Real ICAI questions, instantly graded with bare-Act citations. ~5 minutes. No signup.

Drill 5 questions →
Q.2 16 marks very hard Partnership dissolution - Garner vs Murray rule, insolvent p ⚡ Try this Q →
P, Q, R and S had been carrying on business in partnership sharing profit & losses in the ratio of 4:3:2:1. They decide to dissolve the partnership on the basis of following Balance Sheet as on 30th April, 2011: Liabilities: Capital Accounts — P: ₹1,68,000; Q: ₹1,08,000; Total Capital: ₹2,76,000; General Reserve: ₹95,000; Capital Reserve: ₹25,000; Sundry Creditors: ₹36,000; Mortgage Loan: ₹1,10,000; Total: ₹5,42,000 Assets: Land & Building: ₹2,46,000; Furniture & Fixtures: ₹65,000; Stock: ₹1,00,000; Debtors: ₹72,500; Cash in hand: ₹15,500; Capital overdrawn — R: ₹25,000; S: ₹18,000; Total overdrawn: ₹43,000; Total: ₹5,42,000 The assets were realized as under: (i) Land & Building: ₹2,30,000; Furniture & Fixture: ₹42,000; Stock: ₹72,000; Debtors: ₹65,000 (ii) Expenses of dissolution amounted to ₹7,800. (iii) Further creditors of ₹18,000 had to be met. (iv) R became insolvent and nothing was realized from his private estate. Applying the principles laid down in Garner Vs. Murray, prepare the Realisation Account, Partner's Capital Accounts and Cash Account.
CTTP

Worked Solution

✓ Verified

Garner vs Murray Rule (applied in partnership dissolution when a partner is insolvent): The deficiency of the insolvent partner is borne by the remaining solvent partners in their capital ratio (not profit-sharing ratio). Partners R and S have overdrawn capital accounts (shown as assets in the Balance Sheet). Since R is declared insolvent and nothing is recoverable from his estate, R's net deficiency is written off and shared by P and Q (the only solvent partners with positive capital balances on the Balance Sheet) in their capital ratio of ₹1,68,000 : ₹1,08,000 = 14 : 9. S, though solvent, had a negative (overdrawn) capital balance and is therefore excluded from the Garner vs Murray ratio; S must bring in cash to clear her own deficit.

Realisation Account

Dr side — Assets at book value: Land & Building ₹2,46,000; Furniture & Fixtures ₹65,000; Stock ₹1,00,000; Debtors ₹72,500 = ₹4,83,500. Cash payments: Sundry Creditors ₹36,000; Mortgage Loan ₹1,10,000; Further Creditors ₹18,000; Dissolution Expenses ₹7,800 = ₹1,71,800. Total Dr = ₹6,55,300.

Cr side — Liabilities transferred: Sundry Creditors ₹36,000; Mortgage Loan ₹1,10,000 = ₹1,46,000. Proceeds received: Land & Building ₹2,30,000; Furniture ₹42,000; Stock ₹72,000; Debtors ₹65,000 = ₹4,09,000. Loss on Realisation = ₹1,00,300 transferred to partners in 4:3:2:1 — P ₹40,120; Q ₹30,090; R ₹20,060; S ₹10,030.

Partners' Capital Accounts

Reserves (General ₹95,000 + Capital ₹25,000 = ₹1,20,000) credited in 4:3:2:1: P ₹48,000; Q ₹36,000; R ₹24,000; S ₹12,000.

After reserves and loss on realisation: P = ₹1,75,880 (Cr); Q = ₹1,13,910 (Cr); R = ₹21,060 (Dr — deficiency, insolvent); S = ₹16,030 (Dr — deficiency, solvent, must pay cash).

Applying Garner vs Murray: R's deficiency ₹21,060 shared by P and Q in capital ratio 14:9 — P bears ₹12,819; Q bears ₹8,241.

Final settlement: P receives ₹1,63,061; Q receives ₹1,05,669; S pays ₹16,030 to bank.

Cash Account

Total receipts: Opening cash ₹15,500 + Realisation proceeds ₹4,09,000 + Cash from S ₹16,030 = ₹4,40,530. Total payments: Creditors & expenses ₹1,71,800 + P ₹1,63,061 + Q ₹1,05,669 = ₹4,40,530 ✓.

PLAN

Write it like this

Time target 28 min 48 sec

1The skeleton

- Start with a 2-line Garner vs Murray rule statement — examiner gives reading marks here; write 'deficiency of insolvent partner borne by solvent partners having positive capital balances in their last agreed capital ratio' before touching any account.
- Open Realisation Account first, transfer ALL assets at book value on Dr side and ALL liabilities on Cr side — this locks your loss figure (₹1,00,300) which flows into every account after it, so an error here cascades and kills marks downstream.
- Credit reserves before computing post-dissolution capital balances — General Reserve + Capital Reserve go to all four partners in 4:3:2:1 BEFORE you apply Garner vs Murray; skipping this step means your deficiency figure for R will be wrong and the examiner won't award the ratio step.
- Identify who is excluded from Garner vs Murray explicitly — write in your answer that S is excluded because her capital balance is negative (overdrawn) even before dissolution losses; this one line shows conceptual clarity and picks up presentation marks.
- Compute the Garner vs Murray ratio in your working — show 1,68,000 : 1,08,000 = 14:9 clearly as a named step; examiners are trained to tick this ratio; if you just write the split without showing the ratio derivation you risk losing the step mark.
- Cross-cast your Cash Account last — receipts side = payments side (₹4,40,530) is your self-verification; write the totals on both sides and put a tick; it signals exam discipline and the examiner treats a balanced Cash Account as confirmation your entire solution is correct.

2Examiner-rewarded phrases

“the deficiency of the insolvent partner shall be borne by the solvent partners in the ratio of their capitals as they stood on the date of dissolution”“since nothing is recoverable from the private estate of the insolvent partner, the deficiency of ₹[X] is written off and shared by the remaining solvent partners having positive capital balances”“loss on realisation is transferred to all partners' capital accounts in the profit-sharing ratio of 4:3:2:1”

3Common trap

Don't fall for this

The classic killer is sharing R's deficiency in 4:3:2:1 (profit ratio) instead of the capital ratio of P and Q only — most students know Garner vs Murray exists but revert to profit ratio under exam pressure and also forget to exclude S just because she's solvent; S had an overdrawn capital, so she pays her own deficit in cash and sits out the Garner vs Murray split entirely.

🎯 Practice more Partnership dissolution - Garner vs Murray rule, questions →
Q.3 16 marks very hard Amalgamation - purchase consideration, realisation accounts, ⚡ Try this Q →
X Ltd and Y Ltd were carrying on same business independently. The companies agreed to amalgamate on and from 1-4-2011 and formed a new company Z Ltd. to take over the assets and liabilities of the existing companies. The Balance Sheets of two companies as on 31-3-2011 are as follows: X Ltd. Liabilities: Equity Share Capital (₹10 each, fully paid): ₹30,00,000; Securities Premium: ₹6,00,000; General Reserve: ₹9,00,000; Profit & Loss Account: ₹5,40,000; 10% Debentures: ₹15,00,000; Sundry Creditors: ₹7,80,000; Total: ₹73,20,000 X Ltd. Assets: Land & Building: ₹27,00,000; Plant & Machinery: ₹15,00,000; Investments (15,000 Shares of Y Ltd.): ₹2,40,000; Stock: ₹15,60,000; Debtors: ₹12,30,000; Cash at Bank: ₹90,000; Total: ₹73,20,000 Y Ltd. Liabilities: Equity Share Capital (₹10 each, fully paid): ₹18,00,000; General Reserve: ₹7,50,000; Profit & Loss Account: ₹4,80,000; Secured Loan: ₹9,00,000; Sundry Creditors: ₹5,10,000; Total: ₹44,40,000 Y Ltd. Assets: Land & Building: ₹13,50,000; Plant & Machinery: ₹11,40,000; Stock: ₹10,50,000; Debtors: ₹7,80,000; Cash at Bank: ₹1,20,000; Total: ₹44,40,000 Additional information: (i) For the purpose of amalgamation, the shares are to be valued as: X Ltd. = ₹18 per share; Y Ltd. = ₹20 per share. (ii) A contingent liability of X Ltd. of ₹1,80,000 is to be treated as actual existing liability. (iii) The shareholders of X Ltd and Y Ltd. are to be paid by issuing sufficient number of shares of Z Ltd. at a premium of ₹6 per share. (iv) The face value of shares of Z Ltd. is ₹10 each.
CTTP

Worked Solution

✓ Verified

(i) Purchase Consideration (PC) and Shares to be Issued by Z Ltd.

Z Ltd. Issue Price per share = ₹10 (face value) + ₹6 (premium) = ₹16 per share

For X Ltd. Shareholders:
Number of X Ltd. shares = ₹30,00,000 ÷ ₹10 = 3,00,000 shares
PC = 3,00,000 × ₹18 = ₹54,00,000
Z Ltd. shares to be issued = ₹54,00,000 ÷ ₹16 = 3,37,500 shares

For Y Ltd. Shareholders:
Number of Y Ltd. shares = ₹18,00,000 ÷ ₹10 = 1,80,000 shares
PC = 1,80,000 × ₹20 = ₹36,00,000
Z Ltd. shares to be issued = ₹36,00,000 ÷ ₹16 = 2,25,000 shares

Total Z Ltd. shares issued = 3,37,500 + 2,25,000 = 5,62,500 shares

---

(ii) Realisation Account and Equity Shareholders' Account

Realisation Account — X Ltd.

Dr. ParticularsCr. Particulars
Land & Building27,00,00010% Debentures (Z Ltd.)15,00,000
Plant & Machinery15,00,000Sundry Creditors (Z Ltd.)7,80,000
Investments in Y Ltd.2,40,000Contingent Liability (Z Ltd.)1,80,000
Stock15,60,000Z Ltd. – Purchase Consideration54,00,000
Debtors12,30,000
Cash at Bank90,000
Contingent Liability (now actual)1,80,000
Profit on Realisation (to Shareholders)3,60,000
Total78,60,000Total78,60,000

Note: The contingent liability of ₹1,80,000 appears on both sides — debited when recognised as actual, and credited when Z Ltd. assumes it. The net effect on profit is nil.

Equity Shareholders' Account — X Ltd.

Dr. ParticularsCr. Particulars
Shares in Z Ltd.54,00,000Equity Share Capital30,00,000
Securities Premium6,00,000
General Reserve9,00,000
Profit & Loss A/c5,40,000
Profit on Realisation3,60,000
Total54,00,000Total54,00,000

---

Realisation Account — Y Ltd.

Dr. ParticularsCr. Particulars
Land & Building13,50,000Secured Loan (Z Ltd.)9,00,000
Plant & Machinery11,40,000Sundry Creditors (Z Ltd.)5,10,000
Stock10,50,000Z Ltd. – Purchase Consideration36,00,000
Debtors7,80,000
Cash at Bank1,20,000
Profit on Realisation (to Shareholders)5,70,000
Total50,10,000Total50,10,000

Equity Shareholders' Account — Y Ltd.

Dr. ParticularsCr. Particulars
Shares in Z Ltd.36,00,000Equity Share Capital18,00,000
General Reserve7,50,000
Profit & Loss A/c4,80,000
Profit on Realisation5,70,000
Total36,00,000Total36,00,000

---

(iii) Balance Sheet of Z Ltd. as on 1-4-2011

The 15,000 shares of Y Ltd. held by X Ltd. (₹2,40,000) are transferred to Z Ltd. as an asset. Since Y Ltd. ceases to exist (merged into Z Ltd.), this investment is eliminated. Under AS 14 (Accounting for Amalgamations) — Purchase Method, the excess of Purchase Consideration over the net assets acquired is treated as Goodwill.

Net Assets acquired:
Total assets (X Ltd. + Y Ltd.) = ₹73,20,000 + ₹44,40,000 = ₹1,17,60,000
Less: Investment in Y Ltd. (eliminated) = ₹2,40,000
Net real assets = ₹1,15,20,000
Less: Total liabilities assumed = ₹38,70,000
Net Assets = ₹76,50,000

Goodwill = Total PC − Net Assets = ₹90,00,000 − ₹76,50,000 = ₹13,50,000

Balance Sheet of Z Ltd. as on 1-4-2011

LiabilitiesAssets
Share CapitalGoodwill13,50,000
5,62,500 shares of ₹10 each56,25,000Land & Building40,50,000
Securities Premium33,75,000Plant & Machinery26,40,000
10% Debentures15,00,000Stock26,10,000
Secured Loan9,00,000Debtors20,10,000
Sundry Creditors12,90,000Cash at Bank2,10,000
Contingent Liability (now actual)1,80,000
Total1,28,70,000Total1,28,70,000
PLAN

Write it like this

Time target 28 min 48 sec

1The skeleton

- Start with the PC table first — write 'Issue Price of Z Ltd. = ₹10 + ₹6 = ₹16 per share' as your very first line, so the examiner sees your foundation before the numbers flow; everything downstream depends on this.
- Show PC in two clean steps per company: shares outstanding = paid-up capital ÷ face value → PC = shares × agreed value → Z Ltd. shares = PC ÷ ₹16; skipping any step kills partial marks even if your final figure is right.
- In the Realisation Account, put the contingent liability on BOTH sides — debit it as 'Contingent Liability now recognised' and credit it as 'Contingent Liability assumed by Z Ltd.'; this shows the examiner you know it's a pass-through with zero net P&L impact, which is the exact nuance they're testing.
- Equity Shareholders' Account is your self-check: credit side must sum Share Capital + all reserves + Profit on Realisation = debit side (Shares in Z Ltd.); if it doesn't balance, your Realisation profit figure is wrong — fix it here before moving to the balance sheet.
- In Z Ltd.'s Balance Sheet, eliminate X Ltd.'s investment in Y Ltd. explicitly — show the deduction in your working ('Less: Investment in Y Ltd. eliminated = ₹2,40,000') before computing net assets; missing this makes your Goodwill figure wrong and signals you don't understand cross-holding elimination.
- State AS 14 and 'Purchase Method' when computing Goodwill — write 'As per AS 14 (Purchase Method), Goodwill = Total PC − Net Assets = ₹90,00,000 − ₹76,50,000 = ₹13,50,000'; naming the standard gets you a presentation mark most students leave on the table.

2Examiner-rewarded phrases

“Purchase consideration is computed as the number of shares multiplied by the value agreed upon for the purpose of amalgamation”“The investment held by X Ltd. in Y Ltd. stands eliminated on amalgamation, as Y Ltd. ceases to exist as a separate entity”“As per AS 14 (Accounting for Amalgamations) under the Purchase Method, the excess of purchase consideration over the net assets acquired is treated as Goodwill”

3Common trap

Don't fall for this

The single biggest mark-killer here is forgetting to eliminate X Ltd.'s ₹2,40,000 investment in Y Ltd. when building Z Ltd.'s Balance Sheet — most students just add all assets of both companies and wonder why their Goodwill is off by ₹2,40,000. Also watch out: students often show the contingent liability only on the debit side of Realisation Account, missing the credit entry when Z Ltd. assumes it — that's a direct 2-mark loss.

🎯 Practice more Amalgamation - purchase consideration, realisati questions →
Q.4 16 marks very hard Electricity company accounts - profit appropriation under El ⚡ Try this Q →
M/s. Access Electricity Company earned a profit of ₹75,00,000 (after tax for the year 2010-11) after paying ₹2,40,000 @ 12% as debenture interest for the year ended March 31, 2011. The following further information has been extracted from the Books of company: Share Capital; Fixed Assets; Depreciation Reserve on Fixed Assets; Loan from Electricity Board; Reserve Fund Investments at par invested in 8% Govt. securities; Contingencies Reserve Investments at par 10%: ₹24,00,000; Tariff and Dividends Control Reserve: ₹16,00,000; Security Deposits of Consumers: ₹10,00,000; Consumer's contribution to cost of fixed assets: ₹3,40,000; Intangible Assets: ₹7,60,000; Monthly average of current assets including amount due from consumers ₹7,00,000: ₹34,60,000; Development Reserve: ₹12,00,000. Show how the profits have to be dealt with by the company under the provisions of the Electricity Act. Assume the Bank Rate to be 10%.
CTTP

Worked Solution

✓ Verified

Legal Framework: Under the Sixth Schedule of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, a licensed electricity company's clear profit must be appropriated in a prescribed order after computing the Capital Base and Reasonable Return.

Step 1 — Preliminary Calculations from Available Data

The debenture principal is back-calculated: ₹2,40,000 ÷ 12% = ₹20,00,000. Income on Contingencies Reserve Investments = ₹24,00,000 × 10% = ₹2,40,000 p.a.

Note: The question as presented is missing amounts for (i) Share Capital, (ii) Fixed Assets, (iii) Depreciation Reserve on Fixed Assets, (iv) Loan from Electricity Board, and (v) Reserve Fund Investments. The complete methodology is shown below; wherever specific amounts are absent, the rule and treatment are stated.

Step 2 — Capital Base (per Sixth Schedule)

Capital Base = Net Fixed Assets (Fixed Assets at cost LESS Depreciation Reserve) [data not provided] + Intangible Assets ₹7,60,000 + Working Capital (monthly average Current Assets ₹34,60,000, including ₹7,00,000 due from consumers, LESS monthly average Current Liabilities [not provided]) LESS the following exclusions: Consumer's contribution to fixed assets ₹3,40,000; Security deposits of consumers ₹10,00,000; Tariff and Dividends Control Reserve ₹16,00,000; Development Reserve ₹12,00,000; Contingencies Reserve (funded separately) ₹24,00,000; Loan from Electricity Board [excluded entirely per Sixth Schedule]. Debentures of ₹20,00,000 are not deducted — they form part of the capital base (they are licencee's own long-term loan capital).

Total known deductions = ₹65,40,000. Capital Base = (Net Fixed Assets − Electricity Board Loan) + ₹7,60,000 + ₹34,60,000 − ₹65,40,000.

Step 3 — Reasonable Return

Reasonable Return = Capital Base × Bank Rate = Capital Base × 10% (given).

Step 4 — Clear Profit

Clear Profit = Net profit after tax as given = ₹75,00,000 (debenture interest of ₹2,40,000 has already been charged; it does not get added back for Clear Profit under the standard Sixth Schedule framework taught at CA Intermediate level).

Step 5 — Appropriation of Clear Profit under the Sixth Schedule

The Sixth Schedule mandates the following order of appropriation:

(a) Reasonable Return available as Dividend: The amount of clear profit not exceeding the Reasonable Return is available for dividend. In the event the Reasonable Return computed from the (complete) Capital Base is less than ₹75,00,000, the excess must be dealt with as in (b) and (c) below.

(b) Transfer to Reserve Fund: In any year in which a dividend is paid, the licensee must transfer to the Reserve Fund not less than one-fourth (25%) of the dividend paid. The Reserve Fund is required to be invested in Government securities (here at 8% Govt. securities per the question). The existing Reserve Fund balance (invested at 8%) is available; the annual transfer tops it up to the required level.

(c) Excess Profit (Clear Profit > Reasonable Return): Any amount by which the Clear Profit exceeds the Reasonable Return must be disposed of as follows: one-third of the excess shall be applied to reduce the tariffs charged to consumers or, if the State Government so directs, placed in the Tariff and Dividends Control Reserve; two-thirds of the excess shall be transferred to the Tariff and Dividends Control Reserve (existing balance ₹16,00,000; this reserve can be drawn upon to maintain tariffs or dividends in lean years).

(d) Contingencies Reserve: The licensee must maintain a Contingencies Reserve (existing: ₹24,00,000 invested at 10%). If the balance falls below the prescribed minimum, a further transfer is required from profits before the Tariff & Dividends Control Reserve appropriation.

(e) Development Reserve: Amounts may be transferred to the Development Reserve (existing ₹12,00,000) for replacement and expansion of assets, as determined by the State Electricity Board.

Summary — Format of Profit Appropriation Account (skeleton)

Clear Profit = ₹75,00,000. Less: Transfer to Reserve Fund (1/4 of dividend) = ₹A. Less: Contingencies Reserve (if required) = ₹B. Dividend (≤ Reasonable Return) = ₹C. Less: Excess over Reasonable Return — 1/3 reduces tariffs/goes to Reserve Fund = ₹D; 2/3 to Tariff & Dividends Control Reserve = ₹E. Total = ₹75,00,000.

Once the full Capital Base is computed with the missing balance sheet data (Net Fixed Assets and Loan from Electricity Board), the exact monetary split across A, B, C, D, E can be determined. All other steps and treatment of items (deductions, inclusions, income from investments) are as shown above.

PLAN

Write it like this

Time target 28 min 48 sec

1The skeleton

- Name the Sixth Schedule in your very first line — write 'As per the Sixth Schedule of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948' before touching any number; examiners are trained to scan for this and it signals you know the legal framework, not just arithmetic.
- Back-calculate the debenture principal first (₹2,40,000 ÷ 12% = ₹20,00,000) and show this working explicitly — examiners award a step mark here and it feeds directly into your Capital Base inclusions.
- Set up Capital Base as a structured statement with clear INCLUSIONS and DEDUCTIONS columns — Net Fixed Assets + Working Capital + Intangibles on one side, then deduct Consumer Contributions, Security Deposits, Tariff & Dividends Control Reserve, Development Reserve, Contingencies Reserve, and EB Loan; debentures stay IN — mixing inclusions and deductions into a paragraph kills your marks.
- Compute Reasonable Return = Capital Base × Bank Rate (10%) on its own line — don't bury it inside the appropriation; examiners want to see the comparison between Clear Profit and Reasonable Return as a distinct step.
- Present the final answer as a Profit Appropriation Account (T-format or statement format) with the prescribed order: Reasonable Return as dividend → ¼ to Reserve Fund → excess split 1/3 tariff relief / 2/3 to Tariff & Dividends Control Reserve — this format is what the ICAI suggested answer uses and it shows you know the mandatory sequence.
- End with a closing note on Contingencies Reserve and Development Reserve balances — briefly state whether further transfer is needed given existing balances (₹24,00,000 and ₹12,00,000 respectively); this 2-liner fetches the last 1-2 marks most students leave on the table.

2Examiner-rewarded phrases

“as per the provisions of the Sixth Schedule of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, the clear profit shall be appropriated in the following order”“the amount transferred to the Reserve Fund shall not be less than one-fourth of the amount paid or payable as dividend for that year”“one-third of the excess shall be applied towards reduction of tariffs and two-thirds shall be transferred to the Tariff and Dividends Control Reserve”

3Common trap

Don't fall for this

Heads up — the single biggest mark-killer here is treating debentures (₹20,00,000) the same as the Loan from Electricity Board and deducting both from Capital Base; debentures are the licensee's own loan capital and stay IN the Capital Base, while EB Loan gets excluded entirely — getting this backwards flips your Reasonable Return and the entire appropriation goes wrong.

🎯 Practice more Electricity company accounts - profit appropriat questions →
Q.7 16 marks very hard AS-4 events after reporting period; AS-11 foreign exchange t ⚡ Try this Q →
Answer any four of the following:
Keep reading free — every worked solution + bare-Act citation for AS-4 events after reporting period; AS-11 foreign exchange transactions; ESOP journal entries; AS-12 government grants refund; qualitative characteristics of financial statements
✓ 90-line worked answer · ✓ 5 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 1062 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Start 15-min diagnostic