Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Past papers/ Audit & Ethics/ November 2011
Paper 4 Qs
Question Paper · November 2011

CA Inter Audit & Ethics

This page contains all 4 questions from the CA Inter Auditing & Ethics Question Paper for the November 2011 attempt cycle, sourced from VSI Jaipur.

4 worked solutions ready
Sign up free to unlock every solution + bare-Act citations + how-to-write skeletons. 30 seconds, no card, no spam. Already signed up? Log in.
🎯 Practice this paper now

Drill 5 questions from this paper — instant grading

Real ICAI questions, instantly graded with bare-Act citations. ~5 minutes. No signup.

Drill 5 questions →
Q.2 16 marks very hard Partnership dissolution - Garner vs Murray rule, insolvent p ⚡ Try this Q →
P, Q, R and S had been carrying on business in partnership sharing profit & losses in the ratio of 4:3:2:1. They decide to dissolve the partnership on the basis of following Balance Sheet as on 30th April, 2011: Liabilities: Capital Accounts — P: ₹1,68,000; Q: ₹1,08,000; Total Capital: ₹2,76,000; General Reserve: ₹95,000; Capital Reserve: ₹25,000; Sundry Creditors: ₹36,000; Mortgage Loan: ₹1,10,000; Total: ₹5,42,000 Assets: Land & Building: ₹2,46,000; Furniture & Fixtures: ₹65,000; Stock: ₹1,00,000; Debtors: ₹72,500; Cash in hand: ₹15,500; Capital overdrawn — R: ₹25,000; S: ₹18,000; Total overdrawn: ₹43,000; Total: ₹5,42,000 The assets were realized as under: (i) Land & Building: ₹2,30,000; Furniture & Fixture: ₹42,000; Stock: ₹72,000; Debtors: ₹65,000 (ii) Expenses of dissolution amounted to ₹7,800. (iii) Further creditors of ₹18,000 had to be met. (iv) R became insolvent and nothing was realized from his private estate. Applying the principles laid down in Garner Vs. Murray, prepare the Realisation Account, Partner's Capital Accounts and Cash Account.
CTTP

Worked Solution

✓ Verified

Garner vs Murray Rule (applied in partnership dissolution when a partner is insolvent): The deficiency of the insolvent partner is borne by the remaining solvent partners in their capital ratio (not profit-sharing ratio). Partners R and S have overdrawn capital accounts (shown as assets in the Balance Sheet). Since R is declared insolvent and nothing is recoverable from his estate, R's net deficiency is written off and shared by P and Q (the only solvent partners with positive capital balances on the Balance Sheet) in their capital ratio of ₹1,68,000 : ₹1,08,000 = 14 : 9. S, though solvent, had a negative (overdrawn) capital balance and is therefore excluded from the Garner vs Murray ratio; S must bring in cash to clear her own deficit.

Realisation Account

Dr side — Assets at book value: Land & Building ₹2,46,000; Furniture & Fixtures ₹65,000; Stock ₹1,00,000; Debtors ₹72,500 = ₹4,83,500. Cash payments: Sundry Creditors ₹36,000; Mortgage Loan ₹1,10,000; Further Creditors ₹18,000; Dissolution Expenses ₹7,800 = ₹1,71,800. Total Dr = ₹6,55,300.

Cr side — Liabilities transferred: Sundry Creditors ₹36,000; Mortgage Loan ₹1,10,000 = ₹1,46,000. Proceeds received: Land & Building ₹2,30,000; Furniture ₹42,000; Stock ₹72,000; Debtors ₹65,000 = ₹4,09,000. Loss on Realisation = ₹1,00,300 transferred to partners in 4:3:2:1 — P ₹40,120; Q ₹30,090; R ₹20,060; S ₹10,030.

Partners' Capital Accounts

Reserves (General ₹95,000 + Capital ₹25,000 = ₹1,20,000) credited in 4:3:2:1: P ₹48,000; Q ₹36,000; R ₹24,000; S ₹12,000.

After reserves and loss on realisation: P = ₹1,75,880 (Cr); Q = ₹1,13,910 (Cr); R = ₹21,060 (Dr — deficiency, insolvent); S = ₹16,030 (Dr — deficiency, solvent, must pay cash).

Applying Garner vs Murray: R's deficiency ₹21,060 shared by P and Q in capital ratio 14:9 — P bears ₹12,819; Q bears ₹8,241.

Final settlement: P receives ₹1,63,061; Q receives ₹1,05,669; S pays ₹16,030 to bank.

Cash Account

Total receipts: Opening cash ₹15,500 + Realisation proceeds ₹4,09,000 + Cash from S ₹16,030 = ₹4,40,530. Total payments: Creditors & expenses ₹1,71,800 + P ₹1,63,061 + Q ₹1,05,669 = ₹4,40,530 ✓.

PLAN

Write it like this

Time target 28 min 48 sec

1The skeleton

- Start with a 2-line Garner vs Murray rule statement — examiner gives reading marks here; write 'deficiency of insolvent partner borne by solvent partners having positive capital balances in their last agreed capital ratio' before touching any account.
- Open Realisation Account first, transfer ALL assets at book value on Dr side and ALL liabilities on Cr side — this locks your loss figure (₹1,00,300) which flows into every account after it, so an error here cascades and kills marks downstream.
- Credit reserves before computing post-dissolution capital balances — General Reserve + Capital Reserve go to all four partners in 4:3:2:1 BEFORE you apply Garner vs Murray; skipping this step means your deficiency figure for R will be wrong and the examiner won't award the ratio step.
- Identify who is excluded from Garner vs Murray explicitly — write in your answer that S is excluded because her capital balance is negative (overdrawn) even before dissolution losses; this one line shows conceptual clarity and picks up presentation marks.
- Compute the Garner vs Murray ratio in your working — show 1,68,000 : 1,08,000 = 14:9 clearly as a named step; examiners are trained to tick this ratio; if you just write the split without showing the ratio derivation you risk losing the step mark.
- Cross-cast your Cash Account last — receipts side = payments side (₹4,40,530) is your self-verification; write the totals on both sides and put a tick; it signals exam discipline and the examiner treats a balanced Cash Account as confirmation your entire solution is correct.

2Examiner-rewarded phrases

“the deficiency of the insolvent partner shall be borne by the solvent partners in the ratio of their capitals as they stood on the date of dissolution”“since nothing is recoverable from the private estate of the insolvent partner, the deficiency of ₹[X] is written off and shared by the remaining solvent partners having positive capital balances”“loss on realisation is transferred to all partners' capital accounts in the profit-sharing ratio of 4:3:2:1”

3Common trap

Don't fall for this

The classic killer is sharing R's deficiency in 4:3:2:1 (profit ratio) instead of the capital ratio of P and Q only — most students know Garner vs Murray exists but revert to profit ratio under exam pressure and also forget to exclude S just because she's solvent; S had an overdrawn capital, so she pays her own deficit in cash and sits out the Garner vs Murray split entirely.

Q.3 16 marks very hard Amalgamation - purchase consideration, realisation accounts, ⚡ Try this Q →
X Ltd and Y Ltd were carrying on same business independently. The companies agreed to amalgamate on and from 1-4-2011 and formed a new company Z Ltd. to take over the assets and liabilities of the existing companies. The Balance Sheets of two companies as on 31-3-2011 are as follows: X Ltd. Liabilities: Equity Share Capital (₹10 each, fully paid): ₹30,00,000; Securities Premium: ₹6,00,000; General Reserve: ₹9,00,000; Profit & Loss Account: ₹5,40,000; 10% Debentures: ₹15,00,000; Sundry Creditors: ₹7,80,000; Total: ₹73,20,000 X Ltd. Assets: Land & Building: ₹27,00,000; Plant & Machinery: ₹15,00,000; Investments (15,000 Shares of Y Ltd.): ₹2,40,000; Stock: ₹15,60,000; Debtors: ₹12,30,000; Cash at Bank: ₹90,000; Total: ₹73,20,000 Y Ltd. Liabilities: Equity Share Capital (₹10 each, fully paid): ₹18,00,000; General Reserve: ₹7,50,000; Profit & Loss Account: ₹4,80,000; Secured Loan: ₹9,00,000; Sundry Creditors: ₹5,10,000; Total: ₹44,40,000 Y Ltd. Assets: Land & Building: ₹13,50,000; Plant & Machinery: ₹11,40,000; Stock: ₹10,50,000; Debtors: ₹7,80,000; Cash at Bank: ₹1,20,000; Total: ₹44,40,000 Additional information: (i) For the purpose of amalgamation, the shares are to be valued as: X Ltd. = ₹18 per share; Y Ltd. = ₹20 per share. (ii) A contingent liability of X Ltd. of ₹1,80,000 is to be treated as actual existing liability. (iii) The shareholders of X Ltd and Y Ltd. are to be paid by issuing sufficient number of shares of Z Ltd. at a premium of ₹6 per share. (iv) The face value of shares of Z Ltd. is ₹10 each.
Get the worked solution + bare-Act citation for Amalgamation - purchase consideration, realisation accounts, post-amalgamation balance sheet
✓ 57-line worked answer · ✓ 1 bare-Act citation · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 778 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.4 16 marks very hard Electricity company accounts - profit appropriation under El ⚡ Try this Q →
M/s. Access Electricity Company earned a profit of ₹75,00,000 (after tax for the year 2010-11) after paying ₹2,40,000 @ 12% as debenture interest for the year ended March 31, 2011. The following further information has been extracted from the Books of company: Share Capital; Fixed Assets; Depreciation Reserve on Fixed Assets; Loan from Electricity Board; Reserve Fund Investments at par invested in 8% Govt. securities; Contingencies Reserve Investments at par 10%: ₹24,00,000; Tariff and Dividends Control Reserve: ₹16,00,000; Security Deposits of Consumers: ₹10,00,000; Consumer's contribution to cost of fixed assets: ₹3,40,000; Intangible Assets: ₹7,60,000; Monthly average of current assets including amount due from consumers ₹7,00,000: ₹34,60,000; Development Reserve: ₹12,00,000. Show how the profits have to be dealt with by the company under the provisions of the Electricity Act. Assume the Bank Rate to be 10%.
Get the worked solution + bare-Act citation for Electricity company accounts - profit appropriation under Electricity Act
✓ 66-line worked answer · ✓ 3 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 778 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Q.7 16 marks very hard AS-4 events after reporting period; AS-11 foreign exchange t ⚡ Try this Q →
Answer any four of the following:
Get the worked solution + bare-Act citation for AS-4 events after reporting period; AS-11 foreign exchange transactions; ESOP journal entries; AS-12 government grants refund; qualitative characteristics of financial statements
✓ 90-line worked answer · ✓ 5 bare-Act citations · ✓ 3 examiner-rewarded phrases · ✓ Common-trap warning · ✓ How-to-write skeleton
✓ Join 778 CA Inter aspirants on catargettestprep Already signed up? Log in.
Start 15-min diagnostic