Question 1

Whether the view of Mudit regarding obtaining understanding of the client business is correct:

Accepted Answer

**Answer: (B)**

Mudit's view is **not correct**. SA 315 'Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment' explicitly requires auditors to obtain an understanding of the entity and its business environment. This understanding is **not limited to the engagement partner alone** but is mandatory for **all members of the audit team**.

Understanding the business and business environment is fundamental to an effective audit because it enables the audit team to: (1) identify and assess risks of material misstatement at both the financial statement and assertion levels; (2) design appropriate and effective audit procedures responsive to the identified risks; (3) evaluate the reasonableness of management's judgments and estimates; and (4) understand the context in which they are performing specific audit procedures.

Without such understanding, audit team members would be performing procedures mechanically without understanding their purpose or the broader context, which would compromise audit quality and effectiveness. Therefore, option (B) correctly states that the understanding of business and business environment is very important for all members conducting the audit.

Question 2

What kind of confirmation requests Rohit decided to send the debtors for verification of balances of trade receivables?

Accepted Answer

**Answer: (B) Positive confirmation.**

Rohit's decision to request debtors "to reply positively whether the balance in their books tallies with the balance mentioned in the request letters" constitutes a **positive confirmation request**. In positive confirmation, the auditor explicitly asks the third party (debtor) to respond in all cases, confirming whether they agree or disagree with the stated balance. This requires an affirmative response from the debtor regardless of whether the balance matches. Rohit's instruction for the debtors to reply positively makes it clear that he expects a definitive response confirming the balance, which is the hallmark of positive confirmation as opposed to negative confirmation, where a response is expected only if the recipient disagrees with the stated amount.

Question 3

Which sample selection method has been opted by Rohit while verifying the loans and advances given by the company?

Accepted Answer

**Answer: (C)**

Rohit employed **Haphazard Sampling** while verifying loans and advances. The case clearly states that he "selected the sample for checking without following any structured approach though he made sure to avoid any conscious biasness or predictability" and ensured "all the individual balances...had a chance of selection."

Haphazard sampling is a non-statistical sampling method where the auditor selects items in an unsystematic manner without following a predetermined mathematical formula. However, the auditor consciously attempts to avoid bias by ensuring each item has an opportunity to be selected. This is distinct from interval sampling (which uses fixed intervals), block sampling (which uses consecutive batches), and monetary unit sampling (which is based on monetary values and uses statistical probability). SA 530 defines haphazard sampling as the auditor's attempt to select a representative sample without following a structured selection technique.

Question 4

While verifying the inventory of the client company, which assertion is being verified by Mudit?

Accepted Answer

**Answer: (A)**

Mudit is verifying the **Cut-Off assertion** for inventory. The cut-off assertion ensures that transactions are recorded in the correct accounting period. Specifically, Mudit's procedure of verifying that year-end inventory does not include any element of the next financial year is a classic cut-off test for inventory—it confirms that only inventory belonging to the current financial year is included in the year-end balance, and no purchases or transactions from the subsequent financial year have been incorrectly included. This is distinct from valuation (how inventory is valued), rights and obligations (ownership), or presentation and disclosure (how it is reported).

Question 5

With respect to fixed assets, which assertion does Mudit want to check?

Accepted Answer

**Answer: (C)**

Mudit is verifying the **Rights and Obligations assertion** for fixed assets. The audit procedures being performed specifically involve obtaining title deeds for the building and purchase bills for assets purchased. These documents directly establish the legal ownership of fixed assets and the company's right to possess and use them. Title deeds are the primary documentary evidence that the company has ownership rights over the building, while purchase bills establish that the company is the rightful purchaser of the assets. Under the Rights and Obligations assertion as per SA 315 and SA 320 (Standards on Auditing), the auditor must verify that assets included in the financial statements represent rights of the entity. By examining title deeds and purchase documentation, Mudit is confirming that the fixed assets appearing in the balance sheet are indeed the company's legally owned assets, and the company has the obligation to maintain and utilize them appropriately.

Question 6

CA Rocky is a recently qualified Chartered Accountant. He is appointed as an auditor of Sky Ltd. for the current Financial Year 2023-24. CA Rocky is of the view that he shall record all the matters related to audit i.e., audit procedures to be performed, audit evidence obtained and conclusions reached. Thus, he maintained a file and recorded each and every finding during the audit. His audit file also includes audit programmes, notes reflecting preliminary thinking, letters of confirmation, e-mails concerning significant matters, etc. State which of the following need not be included in the audit documentation?

Accepted Answer

**Answer: (D)**

SA 230 (Audit Documentation) requires the auditor to document all matters that are important in providing evidence that the audit was planned and performed in accordance with SAs. However, it specifically does NOT require the inclusion of preliminary thinking or working notes that do not form part of the final audit conclusions or support the audit evidence base.

Audit programmes (A) must be documented to show what procedures were planned and performed. Letters of confirmation (C) are audit evidence and must be retained as they provide direct evidence from third parties. E-mails concerning significant matters (B) should be included as they document how significant matters were addressed and provide evidence of the auditor's response.

Notes reflecting preliminary thinking (D), such as draft analyses or preliminary conclusions that were later revised or superseded, need not be retained in the final audit documentation if they do not support the final audit conclusions or represent significant findings.

Question 7

CA Ramesh has been the auditor of XYZ Ltd. for the past 10 years. Over these years, he has built a personal relationship with Mr. Rajan, CEO of the company. During the audit, CA Ramesh discovers several discrepancies, but he feels uncomfortable reporting these issues due to his personal relationship with Mr. Rajan. He has also accepted gifts from the company on several occasions. As a result, CA Ramesh is concerned about the impact of his long-standing relationship with Mr. Rajan on the audit report. Which threat to independence exists in the given case?

Accepted Answer

**Answer: (B)**

The threat to independence in this case is a **Familiarity threat**. A familiarity threat arises when a member's long association with a client, or close personal relationship with client personnel, makes the member too sympathetic to the client's interests or insufficiently skeptical in evaluating client representations.

In the given scenario, the key indicators of a familiarity threat are: (i) CA Ramesh's 10-year continuous relationship with XYZ Ltd.; (ii) his personal relationship with Mr. Rajan, the CEO; (iii) his expressed discomfort in reporting discrepancies due to this personal bond; and (iv) his acknowledgment that this long-standing relationship may impair his professional judgment in the audit report. These factors demonstrate the classic hallmark of a familiarity threat—loss of professional skepticism and objectivity stemming from excessive familiarity.

While the acceptance of gifts could indicate an element of self-interest threat, the dominant threat in this case is familiarity. Self-interest threat typically arises from financial interests (shareholding, loans, dependence on fees). Self-review threat applies when auditors review their own work. Advocacy threat occurs when the auditor promotes the client's position. None of these are the primary concern here—the core issue is that his long familiarity with the CEO has compromised his independence and objectivity.

Question 8

CA Paras is auditing a firm's financial statements and performs detailed procedures to verify assertions. The firm is engaged in export of goods to Europe. The sales invoices raised in Euros are converted into Indian rupees as per applicable norms. He checks classification of expenses, ensures trade payables are genuine, compares current and past wages, examines title deeds for land, and checks the accuracy of calculation of the conversion of foreign currency into Indian rupees for export invoices. Which audit procedure did he perform to verify whether conversion of foreign currency into Indian rupees is proper or not?

Accepted Answer

**Answer: (B)**

CA Paras performed **Recalculation** to verify the proper conversion of foreign currency into Indian rupees. Recalculation is an audit procedure where the auditor independently recomputes mathematical or arithmetical calculations already performed by the entity's management to verify their accuracy. In this case, CA Paras rechecked the exchange rate conversion applied to Euro invoices to ensure they were correctly converted into Indian rupees using the applicable exchange rates as per applicable accounting standards and norms. This procedure directly addresses the accuracy of the mathematical computation without requiring observation of the process or inspection of supporting documents alone.

Question 9

XYZ Ltd., a manufacturing company based in India, operates multiple plants across the country and deals in complex machinery, which requires specialized maintenance and valuation expertise. XYZ Ltd. appointed CA Dhruv as Statutory auditor. During the audit, he observed that the management consistently applied the same method for valuation of inventory over the past few years, but this year, without proper disclosure, they switched to a different valuation method, which resulted in higher reported profits. Does such a matter fall within scope of audit?

Accepted Answer

**Yes, this matter falls squarely within the scope of audit.**

**Scope of Audit and Accounting Policies**: Under Standards on Auditing (SA) 300 and related standards, the auditor's scope explicitly includes examining whether accounting policies applied are appropriate, consistently applied, and compliant with applicable accounting standards and legal requirements. Changes in accounting policies form an integral part of this audit examination.

**Relevant Accounting Standards**: Ind AS 8 'Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors' mandates that changes in accounting policies must be accounted for retrospectively with detailed disclosure, including the impact on profits and comparative figures. AS 1 'Disclosure of Accounting Policies' (now Ind AS 101) requires comprehensive disclosure of all significant accounting policies in the notes to financial statements.

**Mandatory Disclosure Requirements**: Under Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013, and the applicable accounting framework, any change in accounting policy must be: (a) clearly disclosed in notes to financial statements; (b) quantified in terms of its impact on reported results; (c) applied with comparative figure adjustments if retrospective; and (d) accompanied by explanation of reasons for the change.

**SA 240 Considerations**: Standards on Auditing (SA) 240 'The Auditor's Responsibility Relating to Fraud and Error' requires auditors to consider material misstatements, whether arising from …

Question 10

ATL Pvt. Ltd., a leading manufacturing company, appointed CA Atul as an auditor for the year 2023-24. Given the complexity of the company's operations and the need for a systematic approach, he plans to design a detailed audit programme to ensure the accuracy of financial assertions. As a CA student, if you were assisting CA Atul in constructing this audit programme, what are the points you will keep in mind?

Accepted Answer

In designing a comprehensive audit programme for ATL Pvt. Ltd., CA Atul should focus on the following key considerations:

**Understanding of the Entity and its Environment**: Obtain thorough knowledge of ATL's business model, manufacturing operations, industry characteristics, regulatory environment, and organizational structure. This understanding forms the foundation for risk assessment and programme design.

**Risk Assessment and Identification**: Conduct preliminary risk assessment to identify inherent risks and control risks specific to manufacturing operations. Assess the company's risk management framework and identify areas of high risk requiring detailed audit procedures, such as inventory management, fixed asset controls, and production costing systems.

**Materiality Determination**: Establish overall materiality, performance materiality, and specific materiality thresholds for significant account balances and classes of transactions. This determines the scope and depth of audit procedures for manufacturing-related accounts like inventory, plant and machinery, and manufacturing expenses.

**Financial Statement Assertions**: Design the audit programme to test all five assertions—existence/occurrence, completeness, valuation, rights and obligations, and presentation—for each significant account. Each assertion requires specific audit procedures tailored to the manufacturing environment.

**Nature and Extent of Audit Procedures**: Include a mix of substantive procedu…

Question 11

In an automated environment, General IT controls are policies and procedures that relate to many applications and support the effective functioning of application controls. It includes access security as well as program change. What are the objectives and activities included in access security and program change?

Accepted Answer

**General IT Controls (GITC)** in an automated environment comprise policies and procedures that support effective functioning of application controls across many systems. Two critical components are **Access Security** and **Program Change**, each with distinct objectives and activities.

**ACCESS SECURITY**

**Objectives:**
1. To ensure that only **authorized personnel** have access to systems, applications, and data
2. To **prevent unauthorized access** and maintain confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information
3. To enforce **segregation of duties** to prevent fraud and errors
4. To establish **individual accountability** through user identification and monitoring
5. To maintain **audit trails** for accountability and forensic purposes

**Activities:**
1. **User Access Management** – Creating, modifying, and deleting user IDs; assigning appropriate access rights based on job responsibilities
2. **Authentication Controls** – Implementing strong password policies, multi-factor authentication, and user identity verification
3. **Segregation of Duties (SOD)** – Ensuring incompatible functions are separated (e.g., authorization and execution, custody and reconciliation)
4. **Physical Access Controls** – Restricting entry to server rooms, data centers, and critical IT infrastructure
5. **Logical Access Controls** – Implementing role-based access control (RBAC), permission matrices, and access restriction at system and application levels
6. **Monitoring and Review*…

Question 12

Grape Limited presented its financial statements for the F.Y. 2023-24 to its auditor for expressing an opinion thereon. The auditor while carrying out the audit started comparing various items of profit and loss account of the year under audit with previous financial years. What is the auditor trying to achieve by carrying out those comparisons?

Accepted Answer

The auditor is carrying out **analytical procedures** by comparing P&L items with prior periods to achieve multiple audit objectives that strengthen the overall audit process.

**Understanding Business Changes and Performance Trends**: By comparing current year P&L items with prior period figures, the auditor seeks to understand significant changes in the company's financial performance, operational results, and business environment. This comparison helps establish whether changes are consistent with the auditor's understanding of Grape Limited's business, industry conditions, and economic factors. For example, if revenue has increased significantly without a corresponding increase in expenses, the auditor evaluates whether this is reasonable given business circumstances.

**Identifying Unusual or Unexpected Relationships**: The comparison enables identification of unusual fluctuations, anomalies, or unexpected relationships between P&L items that may indicate potential misstatements, errors, or irregularities. For instance, if cost of goods sold has increased disproportionately to revenue, or administrative expenses have declined unexpectedly despite business growth, these variations signal areas requiring focused investigation.

**Risk Assessment and Materiality Planning**: Analytical procedures help the auditor assess the **risk of material misstatement** at the account level. By understanding the magnitude and nature of year-on-year changes, the auditor can identify high-…

Question 13

CA Tripti is in the midst of conducting audit of a company engaged in manufacturing of range of bicycles in an industrial township located in a North Indian state. As part of its activities, the company procures bicycle components from various small and medium sized enterprises. Besides, the company imports few bicycle components from China on credit terms. The auditor notices that the company has huge trade payables reflected in its financial statements. She wants to be sure that all trade payables reflected in financial statements have been valued appropriately. Suggest few audit procedures to be performed in this respect.

Accepted Answer

**Audit Procedures for Valuation of Trade Payables:**

The auditor should perform the following key procedures to ensure trade payables are valued appropriately:

**1. Reconciliation of Supplier Statements**
Obtain confirmation directly from suppliers regarding their outstanding balances as of the balance sheet date. Compare the supplier confirmations with the company's ledger balances. Investigate and reconcile any differences, including timing differences for items in transit or recently cleared. This provides independent evidence of the amount owed.

**2. Examination of Post Year-end Invoices**
Review invoices received after the balance sheet date to identify goods received before year-end but invoiced afterwards. Match these with the Goods Received Notes (GRNs) to determine if they should have been accrued at year-end. This addresses the completeness and accuracy of payables valuation, particularly for the import arrangements with Chinese suppliers where shipment delays may occur.

**3. Testing of Supporting Documentation**
For a sample of trade payables recorded in the ledger, examine original purchase invoices and delivery notes. Verify that the amounts in the payables ledger agree with the invoices. Check that all terms (quantity, unit price, agreed discounts) have been correctly reflected. Verify the appropriateness of GST treatment on both domestic (SME) and import supplies.

**4. Review of Credit Notes and Debit Notes**
Examine all credit notes received from supplie…

Question 14

CA Piku has prepared audit documentation of an entity describing nature, timing and extent of audit procedures performed during the course of audit. In documenting nature, timing and extent of audit procedures performed, which matters shall be recorded? He is also of the view that such documentation alone as described above meets the requirements of Standards on Auditing. Comment upon the validity of his views.

Accepted Answer

**Matters to be Recorded When Documenting Nature, Timing and Extent of Audit Procedures**

When documenting audit procedures performed, the **nature** of procedures (what specific audit techniques were employed such as inspection, observation, confirmation, recalculation, analytical procedures, or inquiry), the **timing** (the period to which the audit procedure relates and when it was performed), and the **extent** (the scope of the procedure such as the sample size, number of items examined, population coverage, or percentage of balance tested) must all be clearly recorded. These three elements collectively provide a comprehensive description of the audit work performed on each area of the financial statements.

**Critical Assessment of Piku's View**

Piku's assertion that documentation of nature, timing, and extent alone satisfies SA 230 (Audit Documentation) requirements is **fundamentally incorrect and invalid**. While documenting these three elements is essential and necessary, it represents only a portion of the comprehensive documentation obligations under SA 230.

**Additional Requirements Under SA 230**

Beyond nature, timing, and extent, SA 230 mandates documentation of: (1) **Audit evidence obtained and audit procedures performed** to support the audit conclusions; (2) **Significant findings and issues** identified during the audit, including matters of audit significance that required the application of significant professional judgment; (3) **Results of procedur…

Question 15

On reviewing internal control over inventories as part of statutory audit of a company, the auditor finds that physical verification is not being conducted at regular intervals as stipulated by the management. The auditor finds it to be a significant deficiency in internal control over inventories. He points it out to the management in a one-liner as under: "Physical verification of inventories is not being conducted at regular intervals as stipulated by management." Is the above communication by the auditor proper? Ignore statutory reporting requirements, if any in this regard.

Accepted Answer

No, the auditor's communication is not proper. While it identifies the factual observation, it fails to meet the requirements of SA 265 for communicating significant deficiencies in internal control.

**Requirements under SA 265:**

SA 265 requires that communications of significant deficiencies in internal control must include: (1) a clear description of the deficiency itself; (2) an explanation of why it constitutes a deficiency in the system of internal control; (3) the potential effects and implications on the financial statements; and (4) where practicable, recommendations for remediation. The communication must be sufficiently detailed to enable those charged with governance to understand the nature, severity, and business impact of the deficiency.

**Deficiencies in the Given Communication:**

The auditor's one-liner only states a factual observation—that physical verification is not being conducted at regular intervals. It lacks critical elements:

**What is Missing:**

First, the communication does not explain **why this is a control deficiency**. It should clarify that physical verification is a fundamental control procedure designed to ensure the existence, accuracy, and safeguarding of inventory. The absence of regular physical verification fails to provide evidence of actual physical presence of inventory, creating a gap in the control environment.

Second, it lacks **explanation of potential effects**. The communication should describe how this deficiency could …

Question 16

As per SA 701, the objectives of the auditor are to determine key audit matters and having formed an opinion on the financial statements, communicate those matters by describing them in the auditor's report. Which factors are taken into account by the auditor while determining Key Audit Matters? How are Key Audit Matters communicated in the audit report?

Accepted Answer

**SA 701: Determination and Communication of Key Audit Matters**

**Part A: Factors Considered in Determining Key Audit Matters**

According to SA 701, the auditor determines Key Audit Matters by considering the following factors:

**1. Assessment of Risks of Material Misstatement:** The auditor considers areas identified as having higher assessed risk of material misstatement (whether due to fraud or error). Matters that involved significant risk in accordance with SA 315 are candidates for KAM.

**2. Significant Judgments by the Auditor:** The auditor considers judgments made about areas of the financial statements that involved significant difficulty, subjectivity, or complexity. This includes judgments about the valuation of assets, provisions, and contingent liabilities.

**3. Significant Events or Transactions:** Significant events or transactions identified during the audit that required special audit attention and had a considerable impact on the financial statements are considered as potential KAM.

**4. Significant Accounting Estimates:** Areas requiring judgment in applying accounting policies, particularly those involving subjective measurement or complex calculations (e.g., goodwill impairment, fair value measurements) warrant consideration.

**5. Effect of Management Judgments:** Matters where management's judgments are subjective, complex, or where the auditor disagreed with management's judgments.

**6. Significant Audit Procedures:** Matters that required sig…

Question 17

A government department has been allocated a budget for infrastructure development. During the audit, the auditor observes the following situations. Identify the different types of audits applicable to each of these observations.

Accepted Answer

Government audit under the Controller of Auditor General (CAG) framework comprises four distinct types, each examining different aspects of public expenditure. Understanding these types is crucial for auditors to appropriately categorize and evaluate government transactions.

**Types of Government Audits:**

**Sanction Audit** examines whether expenditure has been incurred with proper authorization and sanction from the competent authority. It verifies that all spending was done in accordance with approved sanctions and delegated financial powers.

**Performance Audit** evaluates the efficiency, effectiveness, and economy of government operations. It assesses whether the intended objectives and benefits of projects or programmes were achieved with the resources utilized.

**Propriety Audit** ensures that expenditure complies with principles of financial propriety and sound public financial management. It checks whether spending was reasonable, necessary, and made in good faith, reflecting prudent and ethical financial conduct.

**Regularity Audit** verifies compliance with applicable laws, rules, regulations, and prescribed procedures. It ensures that financial transactions conform to the formal requirements and procedural frameworks established by law.

**Applicability to Observations:**

(i) **Payments processed without proper approval from competent authority** → **Sanction Audit** is applicable. The absence of proper authorization from the competent authority is the prima…

Question 18

While conducting the statutory audit of a large branch of KNB Bank for the year 2023-24, CA Hema observed that the Profit and Loss account of the branch reflects interest income of ₹ 80 crores and other income of ₹ 5 crores. She also noticed that few borrower accounts at the branch have slipped into NPA category in past periods as well as in the current year. Which audit procedures should be performed by her to verify reversal of income in the books of the branch?

Accepted Answer

**Audit Procedures for Verifying Income Reversal on NPA Accounts:**

**1. Understanding the Policy and Framework**
Obtain and review the bank's accounting policy on income recognition and reversal for NPA accounts. Verify that it complies with RBI guidelines on prudential norms and applicable accounting standards. Determine the trigger point for reversal (typically when an account is classified as NPA) and the method of calculating reversed amounts.

**2. Identification and Listing of NPAs**
Obtain the complete schedule of accounts classified as NPA at the opening of the period and those classified during the year. Verify the accuracy of NPA classification based on RBI-prescribed criteria (days past due, restructuring status, etc.). Cross-check these lists with the bank's loan ledger and internal classification records.

**3. Verification of Income Reversal Amounts**
For each NPA account, calculate the interest income that should be reversed from the date of classification. Verify that interest accrued up to the classification date is retained, but post-classification interest is not recognized as income. Compare calculated reversals with amounts actually recorded in the P&L account. Reconcile the total interest income reversal with the NPA population and outstanding balances.

**4. Examination of Journal Entries and Documentation**
Examine all journal entries related to income reversal for accuracy, appropriateness, and proper authorization. Verify that entry dates align wit…

Question 19

CBC Bank Ltd. has multiple loan accounts classified as Non-Performing Assets (NPAs). During the financial year, some borrowers made partial payments towards their outstanding dues. However, there was no explicit agreement between the bank and the borrowers regarding the appropriation of these recoveries i.e., whether they should be adjusted against principal or interest. The bank's finance team decided to recognise the recovered amount as interest income in its financial statements. However, during the statutory audit, the auditors raised concerns about the treatment of these recoveries. Discuss the appropriate accounting treatment of partial recoveries in NPAs. Also, explain the principles that banks should follow in recognising interest income from NPAs.

Accepted Answer

**Definition and Classification of NPAs:** A Non-Performing Asset (NPA) is an advance where interest and/or principal remains overdue for a period of 90 days or more. Banks must classify NPAs into Substandard, Doubtful, or Loss categories as per RBI's prudential norms. Once an asset is classified as NPA, the accounting treatment of transactions becomes more stringent, particularly regarding income recognition.

**Accounting Treatment of Partial Recoveries (Without Explicit Appropriation Agreement):** When a borrower makes a partial payment on an NPA without an explicit agreement regarding appropriation, the bank must follow the **standard appropriation principle**. The recovered amount should be applied in the following order: (1) First, against outstanding **interest due**, and (2) Second, against the **principal amount outstanding**. The recovered amount should NOT be recognized entirely as interest income. Instead, it represents a reduction in the outstanding dues. The rationale is that under Ind AS 109, interest accrued but not received on credit-impaired financial assets is not recognized as income; therefore, when cash is received, it must logically reduce the outstanding dues (both accrued interest and principal) rather than be recorded as new income.

**Interest Income Recognition Principles for NPAs:** Per Ind AS 109 (Financial Instruments), interest income on financial assets that are credit-impaired (classified as NPAs) must be recognized on a **cash basis only**, …

Question 20

CA Puneet is appointed as an auditor of Kamla Limited for the F.Y. 2023-24. The management of Kamla Limited has requested the auditor to change the terms of original engagement as the company has diversified its business and a few new products have been introduced by the company. Whether CA Puneet can agree to the request made by the management? Under which circumstances can the client make a request to the auditor for a change in the terms of engagement?

Accepted Answer

As per **SA 210 - Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements**, CA Puneet can agree to the management's request to change the terms of the original engagement, provided there is adequate and reasonable justification. The auditor must exercise professional judgment to ensure the change does not improperly reduce audit scope.

**Direct Answer:** Yes, CA Puneet can agree to the request made by Kamla Limited's management, subject to the following conditions: (i) There must be reasonable justification for the change; (ii) The change must not impair audit effectiveness; and (iii) The revised terms must be communicated through a revised engagement letter. In this case, the company's business diversification and introduction of new products constitutes a genuine change in circumstances that justifies revising engagement terms to ensure appropriate audit scope and risk assessment.

**Relevant Requirements Under SA 210:**

Paragraph 15 of SA 210 explicitly addresses changes to engagement terms. It states that an auditor may agree to a change in the terms of an engagement only if the auditor is satisfied that there is reasonable justification to do so. The auditor should not agree to a change merely to reduce audit scope or avoid addressing audit concerns without adequate business rationale.

**Circumstances Under Which Client Can Request Changes to Engagement Terms:**

1. **Significant Changes in Business Operations:** When the entity diversifies its business, introduces new products, ent…

CA Inter Audit & Ethics

Drill 5 questions from this paper — instant grading

Worked Solution

Write it like this

1The skeleton

2Examiner-rewarded phrases

3Common trap