Worked Solution
✓ VerifiedAnswer to True/False Statements (Any Seven out of Eight):
(a) CORRECT. Even if law or regulation prescribes sufficient details of audit engagement items, the auditor must still record them in a written agreement. SA 210 (Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements) mandates that the auditor should agree with the client on engagement terms and document them in writing. This written agreement serves to establish mutual understanding, clarify responsibilities, and provide evidence of the engagement scope. Recording in writing is a fundamental requirement regardless of whether regulatory provisions exist.
(b) INCORRECT. The auditor is required to periodically review the audit engagement understanding with the client. As per SA 210, the auditor should communicate with management if circumstances change or if there are modifications to the engagement terms. Periodic review ensures the engagement understanding remains appropriate, relevant, and complete. Non-review of engagement understanding fails to address changing circumstances and potential misunderstandings.
(c) INCORRECT. Dividends are not recognized in the statement of profit and loss as described. Under Ind AS 1 (Presentation of Financial Statements), dividends paid or payable are presented in the statement of changes in equity, not in the profit and loss statement. Additionally, the criterion for recognizing a dividend liability is when the entity has a present obligation (typically when declared/approved by the board), not merely when the amount can be measured reliably. Reliable measurement is a supporting condition, not the primary recognition criterion.
(d) INCORRECT. Under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008, every LLP is required to file the Statement of Accounts within 30 days from the end of the financial year, not 60 days. The Schedule 6 filing requirement specifies 30 days as the deadline. Filing after 30 days constitutes a violation of statutory obligations and invites penalties.
(e) INCORRECT (Both parts are incorrect). Per RBI guidelines on NPA classification, classification is determined based on payment status (days of default), not on availability of security. Security availability is relevant for provisioning purposes, not classification. Additionally, asset classification is borrower-wise and not facility-wise—if one facility of a borrower is classified as NPA, all other facilities of the same borrower must also be classified as NPA, regardless of their individual payment status.
(f) CORRECT. The audit plan is indeed more detailed than the overall audit strategy. As per SA 300 (Planning an Audit of Financial Statements), the overall audit strategy establishes the direction and scope of the audit at a high level, while the audit plan translates this strategy into specific detailed procedures, timing, and responsibilities for addressing the identified risks of material misstatement.
(g) CORRECT. Risks of material misstatement are generally greater for accounting estimates involving significant judgement. Per SA 240 (The Auditor's Responsibilities Relating to Fraud) and SA 330 (The Auditor's Response to Assessed Risks), judgmental matters and estimates are inherently subject to estimation risk and the potential for management bias. The greater the degree of judgment required, the higher the risk of unintentional or intentional misstatement.
(h) INCORRECT. Formal confirmation procedures are not restricted only to assets, liabilities, and their elements. SA 505 (External Confirmations) establishes that confirmation procedures may be used for various assertions including, but not limited to: receivables (assets), payables (liabilities), revenue recognized, services provided, and other transaction items. While confirmations are commonly used for asset and liability assertions, they can extend to revenue, expenses, and other balances when relevant to the audit objectives.
Write it like this
1The skeleton
- State your verdict in word one — write 'CORRECT' or 'INCORRECT' in caps before anything else; examiners mark serially and your verdict is what they look for first, not your reasoning.
- Drop the SA/Act/RBI citation in sentence two — 'As per SA 210...' or 'Under the LLP Act, 2008...' signals to the examiner you know the source, which is where the first mark usually sits.
- For INCORRECT answers, flip to the correct position explicitly — don't just say 'the statement is wrong'; state what the correct rule IS (e.g., '30 days, not 60') so the examiner sees you know the right answer, not just that the statement is false.
- Keep each answer to 3-4 lines max — you have 7 answers to write in ~12 minutes; padding one kills time on the others, and examiners aren't rewarding word count here.
- For multi-part incorrect statements (like NPA), call out BOTH errors separately — one line each, because the examiner's marking scheme likely has a point for each sub-error.
2Examiner-rewarded phrases
3Common trap
Heads up — the biggest mark-killer here is writing a correct reason but a wrong verdict, or skipping the verdict entirely and burying 'this is incorrect' in line 3. Also watch out for confusing SA 210 (engagement terms) with SA 220 (quality control) — they sound similar under exam pressure and swapping them tanks the citation mark instantly.