Worked Solution
✓ VerifiedWhen CA S, the new statutory auditor, forms an opinion on the Comparative Financial Statements for FY 2021-2022, his reporting responsibilities are governed by SA 510 (Initial Engagements – Opening Balances), SA 700 (Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements), and SA 710 (Comparative Information – Corresponding Figures and Comparative Financial Statements).
Responsibility for Comparative Figures (FY 2020-2021):
CA S is not required to re-audit the prior year's financial statements (FY 2020-2021). However, CA S cannot express an opinion on these comparative figures since he did not conduct the audit. Instead, CA S must identify the previous auditor's report clearly in the audit report and reference the qualified opinion already issued.
Obtaining Sufficient Audit Evidence:
CA S must obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the opening balances and the carrying amounts of assets, liabilities, and equity at the beginning of FY 2021-2022 (in accordance with SA 510). This evidence is necessary to determine whether the balances have been properly carried forward and whether the prior year's qualified opinion matters have been resolved.
Evaluating Impact of Prior Qualified Opinion:
CA S must assess whether the matter causing the previous year's qualified opinion continues to affect the current year's financial statements. If the qualified matter (such as a contingent liability, scope limitation, or misstatement) remains unresolved or impacts the current year, CA S's opinion on the current year may also be modified. Conversely, if the matter has been resolved, no modification is necessary for the current year.
Reporting Approach:
In the audit report, CA S should clearly state that he did not audit the comparative figures for FY 2020-2021 and that the opinion on these figures is that of the previous auditor. The previous auditor's qualified opinion should be referenced without re-expressing it. If the prior year qualification materially affects the current year's figures or disclosures, CA S must consider modifying the opinion on the current year's financial statements.
Key Requirement under CARO 2020:
Under the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order 2020, the statutory auditor must clearly disclose the predecessor auditor's audit opinion and any qualifications in the audit report for transparency and compliance with regulatory requirements.
Write it like this
1The skeleton
- Name SA 710 and SA 510 in your very first line — examiners are trained to scan for the SA numbers instantly; if they don't see them in line 1, you've already lost the easy marks before they read anything else.
- State CA S's core position upfront: he is NOT required to re-audit FY 2020-2021 — this is the anchor of the whole answer; write it as a direct assertion so the examiner knows you understand the legal boundary, not just the theory.
- Then pivot to what he IS required to do: obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on opening balances under SA 510 — this shows you understand the positive obligation, not just the exemption, and covers a separate SA which signals depth.
- Address the 'continuing impact' test separately as its own paragraph — write explicitly: if the qualified matter still affects current year figures, CA S's opinion on FY 2021-2022 may also be modified; examiners look for this cause-and-effect logic as a standalone point, not buried inside another paragraph.
- Close with the reporting mechanic: reference the predecessor's report, do not re-express it — this is the practical output step; always end with what actually goes into the audit report so the answer has a clean landing.
- If you have space, add one line on CARO 2020 disclosure — it's a bonus signal that you're current-year-aware and lifts you above students who stay purely in SA-land.
2Examiner-rewarded phrases
3Common trap
The classic killer here is writing that CA S 'should verify' or 're-examine' the prior year figures — that's wrong and examiners mark it down because SA 710 explicitly says he does NOT re-audit them. Equally dangerous: mentioning SA 510 OR SA 710 but not both — this is a two-SA question and you drop a guaranteed mark if you treat it as one.