## Classification of Interpretation

Interpretation is the process by which courts ascertain the meaning of a statute. Different jurists classify interpretation differently. Two major classifications are by Jolowicz and Fitzgerald.

### A. Classification by Jolowicz

Jolowicz divides interpretation into two broad heads:

1. Legal Interpretation — A rule of law binds the judge to place a certain interpretation on the statute. It is further sub-classified as:

Authentic — when the rule of interpretation is derived from the legislator himself (e.g., a definition clause inserted in the Act).
Usual — when it comes from some other source such as custom or case law.

2. Doctrinal Interpretation — The purpose is to discover the real and true meaning of the statute. It is further sub-classified as:

Grammatical — Court applies ordinary rules of speech to find the meaning of words used in the statute.
Logical — Court goes beyond the words and tries to discover the intention of the statute in some other way.

### B. Classification by Fitzgerald

Fitzgerald classifies interpretation into:

1. Literal (Grammatical) Interpretation

Looks conclusively at the verbal expression of the law; does not look beyond litera legis (the letter of the law).
Duty of the court is to ascertain the intention of the legislature first of all in the words and language employed.

2. Functional (Logical) Interpretation

Departs from the letter of the law and seeks elsewhere for more satisfactory evidence of the true intention of the legislature.
Necessary to determine the relative claims of the letter and the spirit of the enacted law.

### C. Exceptions to Grammatical (Literal) Interpretation

Grammatical interpretation is the default, but the court will travel beyond the letter of the law when:

1. Letter of the law is logically defective — on account of ambiguity, inconsistency, or incompleteness. In case of inconsistency, the court must ascertain the spirit of the law.

2. Text leads to an unreasonable result — so unreasonable that it is self-evident that the legislature could not have meant what it says. The court may then resolve it by inferring logically the intention of the legislature.

### Important Principle on Penalty

If a statute levies a penalty without mentioning the recipient of the penalty, the penalty goes to the Coffers of the State (government's treasury).

Worked example

### Example 1

Example — Authentic vs Usual Interpretation:

The definition of 'company' under Section 2(20) of the Companies Act, 2013, given by the legislator itself, is authentic legal interpretation. The judicial gloss given by the Supreme Court in Salomon v. Salomon style cases regarding 'separate legal personality' through case law is usual legal interpretation.

### Example 2

Example — Grammatical vs Logical Interpretation:

If a statute uses the phrase 'every vehicle shall stop at the railway crossing', a grammatical interpretation reads the words literally — every vehicle including a bicycle. A logical interpretation considers the purpose (safety from trains) and may extend or restrict the meaning of 'vehicle' to align with the statute's object.

### Example 3

Example — Exception to Grammatical Rule (Absurdity):

If a statute says 'no person shall enter the courtroom carrying weapons', a strict grammatical reading would bar a police officer in uniform with a service revolver. The court will adopt a logical construction excluding officers on duty to avoid an absurd result.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

Confusing 'Authentic' with 'Grammatical' — Authentic refers to the SOURCE (legislator) while Grammatical refers to the METHOD (ordinary speech rules).
Assuming Fitzgerald's 'Literal' and Jolowicz's 'Grammatical' are exactly the same — they overlap conceptually but Fitzgerald's classification is a single binary (Literal vs Functional) while Jolowicz's has two levels (Legal/Doctrinal, each sub-classified).
Forgetting that grammatical sense may be modified ONLY to avoid inconvenience/absurdity and NOT further — students often over-apply the logical exception.
Stating that penalty without named recipient lapses or goes to the complainant — it goes to the State's Coffers.

Reference:

Now that you've read this — what's next?

Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.

🔥 Drill 5 Qs on this → ✍️ Adaptive practice →

Classification of Interpretation (Jolowicz & Fitzgerald)

Worked example

⚠️ Common exam mistakes