Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

Persons NOT Eligible for Composition Scheme [Sec 10(2) and 10(2A)]

# Who Cannot Opt for Composition?

## Comparison — Goods scheme vs Services scheme

Disqualifieru/s 10(1) & (2) — Goodsu/s 10(2A) — Services
Makes supplies not leviable to taxIneligibleIneligible
Makes inter-State outward suppliesIneligibleIneligible
Supplies through ECO required to collect TCS u/s 52IneligibleIneligible
CTP or NRTPIneligibleIneligible
Manufacturer of notified goods (ice cream, pan masala, tobacco, aerated waters, fly ash bricks/aggregate/blocks, bricks of fossil meals or similar siliceous earths, building bricks, earthen/roofing tiles)IneligibleIneligible (notified goods/services)
Supplier of servicesIneligible (save marginal services under 10(1) proviso)N/A

## Common gotchas

  • Inter-State INWARD supplies are allowed; only outward inter-State is barred.
  • RCM liability on inward supplies continues — composition dealers pay RCM at normal rates.
  • ECO bar applies only where the ECO is required to collect TCS u/s 52; not every ECO disqualifies.

Worked example

### Example 1

Manufacturer making aerated waters in Gujarat with ₹40 lakh turnover — INELIGIBLE for composition (notified good u/s 10(2)(e)).

### Example 2

Retail trader in Delhi selling locally but procures stock from Mumbai (inter-State INWARD) — ELIGIBLE; inward inter-State is fine.

### Example 3

Restaurant selling via Zomato (ECO collecting TCS) — INELIGIBLE.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Assuming inter-State INWARD supplies disqualify — only outward does.
  • Forgetting CTP/NRTP exclusion.
  • Thinking pure service suppliers other than restaurants can opt under 10(1) — they can only via 10(2A), if eligible.
Reference: Section 10(2) and Section 10(2A) — CGST Act, 2017
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic