## GST Council – The Apex Federal Body for GST Decisions
### Why a GST Council?
Since GST is levied by both Centre and State on the same transaction, a common forum is needed to:
- Avoid inter-governmental disputes
- Maintain uniformity in tax rates and rules
- Make recommendations that bind both Centre and States
Under Article 279A, the President of India is empowered to constitute the GST Council (constituted on 12 September 2016).
### Composition of GST Council
| Position | Role |
|---|---|
| Union Finance Minister | Chairperson |
| Union Minister of State (Finance / Revenue) | Member |
| Finance Minister of each State (or nominated minister) | Member |
One member nominated from among State members is the Vice-Chairperson (for such period as the Council decides).
### Recommendations of the GST Council
The Council recommends on:
1. Tax rates (CGST, SGST, IGST and Cess) on various goods and services
2. Goods and services that should be exempted
3. Taxes, cesses and surcharges that should be subsumed into GST
4. Date from which the 5 petroleum products should be brought under GST
5. Special category States that may get special provisions
6. Threshold limits for registration, composition scheme
7. Model GST law, principles of levy, place of supply rules
8. Any other matter relating to GST
### Procedural Aspects – Decision Making
| Aspect | Rule |
|---|---|
| Quorum | One-half of total members |
| Decision Threshold | 75% of weighted votes of members present and voting |
| Centre's voting weight | 1/3 of total votes cast |
| All States combined | 2/3 of total votes cast |
### Why This Voting Structure?
Neither Centre alone nor all States together can push a decision unilaterally:
- Centre alone has 33% — far short of 75% needed.
- All States together have 67% — also short of 75%.
- So consensus between Centre and a substantial number of States is essential.
### Validity Despite Defects
No act/proceeding of the Council is invalid merely because of:
- Any vacancy or defect in constitution of the Council
- Any defect in appointment of a member
- Any procedural irregularity that does not affect the merits of the case