Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

Departmentalisation and Six Methods of Overhead Absorption

## Departmentalisation and Overhead Absorption Methods

### Departmentalisation of Overhead

Definition: The process of allocating and apportioning overheads to the various departments of an organisation.

Step 1: Divide all departments into Production Departments (directly involved in making the product) and Service Departments (provide support services to production departments and each other — e.g., maintenance, stores, canteen).

Step 2: Allocate and apportion all overheads to both production and service departments.

Step 3: Re-apportion all service department costs to production departments (since service departments are not directly involved in output, all their costs must ultimately rest in production departments for product costing).

#### Advantages of Departmentalisation

1. Better cost estimation: Knowing each department's overheads enables more accurate budgets and better cost control.

2. Better control: Compare actual vs budgeted overhead for each department individually.

3. Accurate product cost: Each job/product is charged only with the overheads of the departments it actually passed through.

4. Accurate WIP valuation: WIP is charged with overheads of only those departments it has passed through, not the entire organisation's overheads.

---

### Six Methods of Overhead Absorption

#### Method 1 — Percentage of Direct Material Cost

$$\text{Rate} = \frac{\text{Total Production OH}}{\text{Budgeted Direct Material Cost}} \times 100$$

Suitable when: Material prices are stable (do not fluctuate widely).

---

#### Method 2 — Percentage of Prime Cost

$$\text{Rate} = \frac{\text{Total Production OH}}{\text{Prime Cost}} \times 100$$

Prime Cost = Direct Material + Direct Labour + Direct Expenses.

---

#### Method 3 — Percentage of Direct Labour Cost

$$\text{Rate} = \frac{\text{Total Production OH}}{\text{Direct Labour Cost}} \times 100$$

Suitable when: Labour rates are stable.

Disadvantages: Ignores distinction between skilled and unskilled labour; ignores distinction between machine work and manual work.

---

#### Method 4 — Direct Labour Hour Rate

$$\text{Rate} = \frac{\text{Total Production OH}}{\text{Direct Labour Hours}}$$

Suitable when: Manual labour is the dominant factor of production.

Disadvantage: Ignores distinction between machine-intensive and manual jobs.

---

#### Method 5 — Machine Hour Rate

$$\text{Rate} = \frac{\text{Total Production OH}}{\text{Number of Machine Hours}}$$

Suitable when: Major portion of production is performed by machines.

This is the most commonly used and preferred method in modern, capital-intensive factories.

---

#### Method 6 — Rate per Unit of Output

$$\text{Rate} = \frac{\text{Total OH}}{\text{Number of Units Produced}}$$

Suitable when: Output is uniform (all units identical).

Disadvantage: Ignores distinction between machine-done and manually-done work.

---

### Choosing the Right Method

SituationBest Method
Machine-dominated productionMachine Hour Rate
Labour-dominated productionLabour Hour Rate
Uniform product outputRate per Unit
Stable material prices% of Direct Material Cost
General/mixed situations% of Prime Cost

Worked example

### Example 1

Departmentalisation — Re-apportionment of Service Dept Costs

Total overhead after primary allocation/apportionment:

  • Production Dept A: ₹80,000
  • Production Dept B: ₹60,000
  • Service Dept (Maintenance): ₹20,000

Maintenance services provided: Dept A uses 60%, Dept B uses 40%.

Re-apportion Maintenance OH:

  • To Dept A: 60% × 20,000 = ₹12,000
  • To Dept B: 40% × 20,000 = ₹8,000

Final production dept OHs:

  • Dept A: 80,000 + 12,000 = ₹92,000
  • Dept B: 60,000 + 8,000 = ₹68,000

### Example 2

Machine Hour Rate Calculation and Application

Dept OH = ₹90,000. Machine hours = 4,500.

Machine Hour Rate = 90,000 / 4,500 = ₹20 per machine hour.

Job X uses 8 machine hours in this dept → OH charged to Job X = 8 × 20 = ₹160.

Job Y uses 3 machine hours → OH charged = 3 × 20 = ₹60.

Contrast with Labour Hour Rate: Dept has 9,000 direct labour hours.

Labour Hour Rate = 90,000 / 9,000 = ₹10/hr.

If Job X uses 4 labour hours → OH = 4 × 10 = ₹40. The method chosen changes the cost charged to each job significantly.

### Example 3

WIP Valuation — Why Departmentalisation Matters

A product passes through Dept 1 (₹40/unit OH) and Dept 2 (₹25/unit OH). Dept 3 (₹30/unit OH) is not yet started.

If 500 units are WIP (completed Dept 1 and 2 only):

OH in WIP = (40 + 25) × 500 = ₹32,500

Without departmentalisation, total org OH per unit might be charged: (40+25+30) × 500 = ₹47,500 → overstating WIP by ₹15,000.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Forgetting to re-apportion service department costs to production departments — service dept OHs must be fully transferred to production depts before calculating absorption rates.
  • Choosing % of Direct Labour Cost when the factory is machine-intensive — this method ignores machine time and understates OH for automated jobs and overstates it for manual ones.
  • Using Rate per Unit when products are not uniform — if different products have different sizes or complexity, a flat rate per unit is inequitable and distorts product cost.
  • Calculating Machine Hour Rate using total factory hours (all departments combined) rather than the specific department's machine hours — absorption rates are always calculated per department, not for the whole factory.
Reference:
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic