Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

Audit of Trade Receivables

# Audit of Trade Receivables

## Importance of Tests of Controls (TOC)

It is important to carry out TOCs for checking effectiveness of internal controls over sales as part of debtors' audit procedure.

## Key Considerations for Trade Receivables

  • Only bona fide sales lead to trade receivables
  • All sales made to approved customers
  • All sales properly recorded in BoA
  • Once recorded, debtors can be settled only by receipt of cash
  • Segregation of duties at every point in sales transaction
  • Debtors are collected on time
  • If not collected in time - reminders sent and legal actions taken
  • Balances are regularly reviewed
  • Proper system of follow up exists

## Audit Procedures by Assertion

### Existence

  • Check whether controls ensure invoices cannot be recorded more than once.
  • Ask for period-end ageing report and trace balance as per report to general ledger.
  • Check whether realization is recorded invoice-wise or not.
  • If any large balance is due for long time, auditor should ask for reasons.

### Direct Confirmation Procedures (Part of Existence)

  • Significant audit activity is to contact customers directly and ask them to confirm amounts of unpaid A/c receivable.
  • Auditor employs direct confirmation procedure with consent of the entity.
  • Trade receivables may be requested to confirm balances either:
  • (a) as at date of Balance Sheet, OR
  • (b) as at any other selected date
  • Form of confirmation may be either:
  • Positive confirmation request (customer asked to reply whether agrees or disagrees)
  • Negative confirmation request (customer asked to reply only if disagrees)

### Completeness (Cut-off Procedures)

Auditor needs to satisfy himself of cut-offs. Without cut-off, sales could be understated or overstated.

Cut-off procedures:

  • For invoices issued during last few days (last 5 days) of year, check that goods are dispatched and not lying with the company.
  • Ensure that all goods dispatched prior to year-end are invoiced and included in debtors.
  • Ensure that no goods dispatched after year-end have been invoiced and included in debtors for the period under audit.

### Valuation

  • Review process followed by company to derive an allowance for doubtful accounts.
  • Obtain ageing report of A/c receivable.
  • Obtain list of debtors under litigation and compare with previous year.
  • Scrutinize analysis and identify those debtors which appear doubtful - discuss with Management.

Worked example

### Example 1

Example - Cut-off issue (overstated sales): ABC Ltd recorded an invoice dated 30 March 2026 for Rs. 5 lakhs in FY 2025-26, but goods were physically dispatched on 5 April 2026. This is a cut-off violation - sales and debtors are overstated by Rs. 5 lakhs. Auditor must propose adjustment to defer this sale to FY 2026-27.

### Example 2

Example - Positive vs Negative confirmation: A confirmation request to customer P (balance Rs. 10 lakhs - large/high risk) is sent as POSITIVE confirmation (response mandatory). A confirmation to small customer Q (balance Rs. 5,000 with reliable payment history) may be sent as NEGATIVE confirmation (reply only if disagreement). The auditor's choice depends on materiality and risk assessment.

### Example 3

Example - Doubtful debt provision: XYZ Ltd's ageing report shows Rs. 50 lakhs due for over 180 days from a customer in financial distress. Last year's provision was 50% of such balance. Auditor reviews if 50% is still appropriate given current debtor health or whether full provision is now warranted.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Performing direct confirmation procedures without obtaining consent of the entity - this is a procedural prerequisite
  • Confusing positive and negative confirmation - negative is used when risk is low and population is large with small balances
  • Not performing cut-off procedures for both sides (dispatched but not invoiced AND invoiced but not dispatched)
  • Relying only on ageing reports for valuation without scrutinizing specific doubtful debtors and litigation status
  • Not obtaining a separate list of debtors under litigation - this is high-risk for non-recovery
Reference:
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic