Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

Non-Sampling Risk and Tolerable Level

## Non-Sampling Risk

The risk that the auditor reaches an erroneous conclusion for any reason NOT related to sampling.

### Sources (mnemonic: HMAR)

  • H – Human Mistakes
  • M – Misinterpreting sample results
  • A – Applying audit procedures not appropriate to the audit objective
  • R – Relying on erroneous information

> Critical point: Non-sampling risk cannot be mathematically measured (unlike sampling risk, which can be quantified using probability theory).

---

## Tolerable Level

The maximum level of misstatement or deviation the auditor is willing to accept before concluding there is a problem.

Tolerable Misstatement (TOD)Tolerable Rate of Deviation (TOC)
NatureA monetary amountA rate/percentage
Set byAuditorAuditor
PurposeObtain assurance that actual misstatement in population does not exceed this amountObtain assurance that actual deviation rate in population does not exceed this rate

### Relationship to Sample Size

  • Lower tolerable level → Larger sample needed (auditor is being stricter)
  • Higher tolerable level → Smaller sample needed

Worked example

### Example 1

Auditor sets tolerable misstatement = ₹5 lakhs for the debtors balance. After projecting sample results: projected misstatement = ₹3L → balance accepted. If projected misstatement = ₹7L → auditor requests adjustment since the tolerable threshold is breached.

### Example 2

Auditor sets tolerable deviation rate = 5% for purchase authorization control. Sample of 60 items shows 3 deviations (5% rate = at the boundary — auditor must use judgment). If 4 deviations found (6.7% > 5%), auditor concludes control is unreliable and expands substantive procedures.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Confusing tolerable misstatement (monetary ₹) with tolerable rate of deviation (%) — each applies only to its respective test type
  • Setting tolerable misstatement equal to overall materiality — in practice it is set lower to allow a cushion for aggregation of errors across multiple accounts
  • Thinking non-sampling risk is zero if the auditor follows correct procedures — it cannot be completely eliminated, only minimized
Reference: — SA 530 – Audit Sampling
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic