Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

Profitability Index (PI) — Merits and Limitations

## Profitability Index (PI)

PI (also called Benefit-Cost Ratio) is a relative measure of a project's value—how much present value is generated per rupee of investment.

> PI = Total PV of Future Cash Inflows ÷ Initial Investment

(Alternatively: PI = 1 + NPV/Initial Investment)

Decision Rule:

  • PI > 1 → Accept
  • PI < 1 → Reject
  • PI = 1 → Indifferent

---

### Advantages

#Advantage
1Incorporates Time Value of Money (uses discounted cash flows, like NPV)
2Relative profitability measure—useful when comparing projects of different sizes (overcomes NPV's scale problem)

---

### Limitations

#LimitationDetail
1Fails under capital rationing with indivisible projectsCannot fractionally select projects; a project with PI = 1.5 cannot be split to use partial funds
2May exclude high-NPV projectsAccepting a single large project with high NPV prevents several smaller projects with collectively higher NPV
3Sequencing effects ignoredA lower-PI project chosen now might free up resources to undertake another project in Year 2, producing higher total NPV—PI misses this dynamic

---

> When to prefer PI over NPV: In capital rationing situations (limited funds, divisible projects), rank projects by PI to maximise total NPV per rupee of budget. When projects are indivisible, use integer programming or trial combinations.

Worked example

### Example 1

Project A: Initial outflow ₹1,00,000; PV of inflows ₹1,30,000 → PI = 1.30. Project B: Initial outflow ₹40,000; PV of inflows ₹54,000 → PI = 1.35. Under PI, Project B ranks higher despite having a lower absolute NPV (₹14,000 vs. ₹30,000). If the budget is ₹40,000, only Project B can be undertaken—PI correctly identifies the better use of limited funds.

### Example 2

Budget: ₹2,00,000. Three divisible projects: X (PI=1.8, cost ₹1,20,000), Y (PI=1.6, cost ₹80,000), Z (PI=1.4, cost ₹1,00,000). Rank by PI: X first, then Y. Total cost = ₹2,00,000—both X and Y fit exactly. Accept X and Y. PI-based ranking leads to optimal capital allocation.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Confusing PI with NPV—PI is a ratio (>1 = accept), NPV is an absolute amount (>0 = accept).
  • Using PI as the sole criterion for mutually exclusive projects—for mutually exclusive decisions, NPV is more reliable since PI ignores absolute value created.
  • Forgetting that PI and NPV always give the same Accept/Reject decision for independent projects; conflicts arise only in ranking or rationing.
  • Applying PI to indivisible projects in capital rationing and treating the highest PI project as always optimal without checking combinations.
Reference:
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic