# Integrated vs Non-Integrated Accounting Systems
## The Big Picture
A business needs two types of accounting records:
- Financial Accounting — for external reporting (P&L, Balance Sheet, statutory needs)
- Cost Accounting — for internal management decisions (cost per product, profitability per division)
The question is: should these two systems be maintained together as one set of books, or separately? This gives rise to the two systems.
## 1. Integrated Accounting System
Meaning: A single set of books in which both cost-related and financial-related transactions are recorded together.
Key features:
- Only one ledger maintained
- Cost accounts and financial accounts are merged
- No separate reconciliation needed between cost and financial profit (they are equal by construction)
- Saves duplication of effort
Suitable for: medium and large entities using ERP systems where all data is captured once and used by both functions.
## 2. Non-Integrated Accounting System
Meaning: Cost-related and financial-related transactions are recorded separately — i.e., cost ledger and financial ledger are maintained as independent sets of books.
Key features:
- Two parallel sets of books
- Cost ledger uses a special account — General Ledger Adjustment A/c — in place of debtors/creditors/cash, because cash/credit are financial items
- Periodic reconciliation needed between cost profit and financial profit
- Each ledger is self-balancing
Suitable for: entities that want cost data managed independently of statutory financial books, or where cost accounting is decentralised.
## Comparison Table
| Point | Integrated | Non-Integrated |
|---|---|---|
| Sets of books | One combined | Two separate |
| Reconciliation | Not required | Required |
| External transactions captured via | Real cash/bank/debtor/creditor a/cs | General Ledger Adjustment A/c |
| Effort/cost | Lower (single entry of data) | Higher (entered twice) |
| Profit comparison | Same | May differ; needs reconciliation |