## Treatment of Spoiled and Defective Work
### Core Definitions
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Spoiled work | Production totally rejected and cannot be rectified |
| Defective work | Sub-standard production capable of being rectified |
---
### Decision Framework for Defective Work
The key question is always: Is this a foreseeable, budgeted cost or an abnormal event?
#### Circumstance 1 – Defectives Within Normal/Established Rate
- Actual defectives ≤ normal limit → Normal cost
- Rectification cost → charged to the entire batch (spread over total output)
- Treated as a regular production cost
#### Circumstance 2 – Defect Due to Bad Workmanship
- Rectification cost = Abnormal cost → written off to Costing Profit & Loss Account
- Exception: If management has pre-budgeted for a proportion of bad-workmanship defects:
- Cost up to the budgeted proportion → Normal cost (charged to batch)
- Cost beyond the budgeted proportion → Abnormal (written off to Costing P&L)
#### Circumstance 3 – Defect from Inspection Department Accepting Poor Material
- Cost of rectification → charged to the Inspection Department (not the batch)
- Written off as abnormal cost in Costing Profit & Loss Account
- Logic: The Inspection Department's error caused the cost; responsibility must lie there to maintain quality control incentives
---
### Summary Decision Tree
```
Defective work found
├── Within normal rate? → Charge to batch (normal production cost)
├── Bad workmanship?
│ ├── Within management's pre-budget? → Normal cost (charge to batch)
│ └── Beyond pre-budget? → Abnormal loss → Costing P&L
└── Inspection dept accepted poor material? → Charge to Inspection Dept → Costing P&L
```