## Special Cases in NPA
### (A) Government Guaranteed Advances
Government guarantees affect NPA treatment differently depending on whether the guarantor is the Central Government or a State Government.
#### Central Government Guaranteed Advances
| Aspect | Treatment |
|---|---|
| Overdue > 90 days, guarantee not invoked | Treat as Standard Asset — no provisioning required |
| Income Recognition | Treat as NPA — recognise interest on cash basis only |
> The Central Govt. guarantee shields the bank from provisioning but NOT from income recognition rules. Interest is still recognised on cash basis.
#### State Government Guaranteed Advances
| Aspect | Treatment |
|---|---|
| Overdue > 90 days | Treat as NPA — full provisioning AND income recognition rules apply |
> State Govt. guarantee provides no special dispensation.
#### Summary
| Aspect | Central Govt. Guarantee | State Govt. Guarantee |
|---|---|---|
| Provisioning | Standard Asset (nil provision) | NPA provisioning required |
| Income Recognition | Cash basis | Cash basis |
---
### (B) Account Regularised Near Balance Sheet Date
Situation: A loan account that was in NPA/SMA territory during the year appears fully regular just before 31st March (Balance Sheet date).
Risk: This may be window dressing — the borrower may have temporarily arranged funds to make the account look current, concealing its underlying weakness. This is a classic area of audit concern.
Auditor's Responsibilities:
1. Do not accept the regularisation at face value — evaluate whether it is genuine.
2. Check for inherent weakness in the account (irregular operations, poor financials, past SMA flags).
3. Test a sample of credits recorded shortly before the BS date to assess if they represent genuine business inflows.
4. Look for reversal entries — journal entries that temporarily bring the account into order, to be reversed after the audit.
5. If inherent weakness exists, classify as NPA despite the apparent regularisation.