Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

Related Party Relationships — Control, Significant Influence & Auditor Responsibilities (SA 550)

## Related Party Relationships

### Control vs. Significant Influence

ConceptMeaning
ControlX Ltd can oversee/govern the strategic and financial decisions of Y Ltd — i.e., has power to direct, not merely influence
Significant InfluenceX Ltd participates in strategic decisions of Y Ltd but does not control them

Key rule: Control > Significant Influence in terms of power. Both create a related party relationship.

---

### Relationships Indicating Control / Significant Influence

LabelRelationship
(a)X Ltd holds equity in Y Ltd
(b)Y Ltd holds equity in X Ltd
(c)Being part of TCWG (Those Charged with Governance)
(d)Close family member of person in (c)
(e)Business relations covered by person/entity in (c)

---

### Why Related Party Relationships Create ROMM

Three root causes of Risk of Material Misstatement (ROMM):

1. Complex relationships — difficult to identify and verify

2. Ineffective information systems — related party data may not be captured

3. Non-market terms — transactions not conducted at arm's length can distort financial position

> Mnemonic: CIN — Complex, Ineffective systems, Non-market terms

---

### Auditor's Responsibilities — Understanding Related Party Relationships & Transactions

#### Step 1 — Inquiry to Management

(A) Identify the entity's related parties and related party relationships from the prior period

(B) Understand the nature of the relationship with each party

(C) Confirm transactions during the year — including their:

  • Type
  • Purpose

#### Step 2 — Inquiry into Management Controls

(A) Assess controls in place to:

  • Identify related party relationships, accounts, and transactions
  • Ensure proper disclosure as per the applicable Financial Reporting Framework (FRF)

(B) Evaluate the authorization and approval process for significant transactions/arrangements with related parties

(C) Review controls over non-standard transactions — those outside normal business operations

#### Step 3 — Verify Existence of Related Party Relationships & Transactions

Inspect the following records and documents:

#Document / Record
(i)Income Tax Returns of the entity
(ii)Records of entity's investments and pension plans
(iii)Information supplied to regulatory authorities
(iv)Shareholder's Register (to identify principal shareholders)
(v)Life insurance policies acquired by the entity
(vi)Internal Auditor Reports
(vii)Significant contracts renegotiated by the entity during the period

Worked example

### Example 1

Example 1 — Identifying Control:

X Ltd holds 70% equity in Y Ltd. During audit of X Ltd, the auditor identifies Y Ltd as a related party (X controls Y via majority equity). All transactions between X Ltd and Y Ltd must be disclosed in the notes to financial statements. The auditor must apply professional skepticism and verify whether transactions are at arm's length or on non-market terms.

_Key question to ask:_ Are goods sold by X to Y at the same price as to unrelated customers? If Y pays significantly less, it signals non-market terms → ROMM exists.

### Example 2

Example 2 — Auditor's Inquiry Procedure:

During the audit of ABC Ltd, the auditor inquires of management about related party transactions. Management discloses payments of ₹5 crore to a company owned by the Managing Director's brother.

Auditor's steps:

1. Check the Shareholder's Register to confirm the brother's ownership

2. Inspect the contract to evaluate whether terms are market-based

3. Verify authorization/approval — was the transaction approved by TCWG?

4. Confirm disclosure in the financial statements per AS 18 / Ind AS 24

5. Check if the same company was a related party in the prior period

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Confusing Control with Significant Influence: Control = power to govern decisions; Significant Influence = power to participate in but not control decisions. Students often use these interchangeably.
  • Forgetting indirect related party relationships — relationships via TCWG membership, or family members of TCWG members, are also related parties.
  • Not recognizing non-market terms as a direct source of ROMM. Any transaction not at arm's length automatically increases risk.
  • Skipping document inspection in Step 3 — students list only management inquiry but ignore verifying existence through records like the Shareholder's Register, tax returns, and renegotiated contracts.
  • Confusing the purpose of Step 3: it is to verify existence of related party relationships and transactions, not to evaluate their appropriateness.
Reference: — SA 550 — Related Parties
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic