## Types of Audit Procedures
### 1. Inspection
Examining records, documents, or physical assets
| Sub-type | Evidence Provided |
|---|---|
| Internal records / documents | Varies by source and effectiveness of internal controls |
| External records / documents | Generally more reliable (third-party source) |
| Physical examination of tangible assets | Existence only — NOT valuation |
> Critical Rule: Inspecting a physical asset (e.g., machinery) proves it exists but does not prove its accounting value (valuation assertion requires separate procedures).
Applications:
- Inspection of inventory during a physical count
- Inspection of a signed contract (evidences execution)
- Test of Controls: inspection provides evidence of authorisation (e.g., approval signatures)
---
### 2. Observation
- Watching a process or procedure being performed by client staff
- Time-bound — provides evidence only at the point of observation
- Observer effect — staff may behave differently because they know they are being watched
---
### 3. Recalculation
- Independently verifying mathematical accuracy of documents or records
- Example: Recalculating depreciation on the fixed asset register
---
### 4. Reperformance
- Independently re-executing a procedure that was originally performed as part of the entity's internal control
- Goes beyond recalculation — the auditor re-does the entire control step
- Example: Independently preparing a Bank Reconciliation Statement to verify the client's reconciliation
---
### 5. Analytical Procedures (SA 520)
Evaluating financial information through analysis of plausible relationships. (Detailed treatment under SA 520.)
---
### 6. External Confirmation (SA 505)
Obtaining a direct written response from a third party. (Detailed treatment under SA 505.)
---
### 7. Inquiry
- Seeking information from knowledgeable individuals — both financial and non-financial
- Sources: within OR outside the entity
- Can range from formal written requests to informal oral discussions
What responses to inquiry can do:
1. Provide new information previously unknown to the auditor
2. Provide corroborative audit evidence (supporting existing findings)
3. Reveal discrepancies compared to other audit findings → triggers further investigation
4. Form the basis for designing additional audit procedures
> Non-negotiable Rule: Inquiry alone is NOT sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
> It must always be corroborated by other procedures.