## Overall Audit Strategy (SA 300)
### What Is the Overall Audit Strategy?
The overall audit strategy sets the scope, timing and direction of the audit and guides the development of the detailed audit plan.
Think of it as the blueprint — the audit plan is the construction schedule.
---
### Audit Strategy vs Audit Plan — Key Differences
| Dimension | Overall Audit Strategy | Audit Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Level | High-level / broad | Detailed |
| Purpose | Sets scope, timing, direction | Describes how to implement the strategy |
| Content | Nature of engagement, risk approach | Nature, timing, extent of specific procedures |
| Relationship | Developed first | Developed after strategy; informed by it |
| Interaction | Changes may cause changes in plan | Changes may cause changes in strategy |
> Key insight: Strategy and plan are not discrete or sequential — they are closely inter-related. A change in one can result in consequential changes in the other.
---
### How the Overall Audit Strategy Assists Resource Management
Establishing the overall audit strategy helps the auditor determine:
1. What resources to deploy — e.g., experienced team members for high-risk areas; experts for complex matters.
2. How much to allocate — e.g., number of team members for inventory count; audit hours budgeted for high-risk areas; extent of review of component auditors' work.
3. When to deploy — e.g., whether resources are deployed at interim stage or at key cut-off dates.
4. How to manage and supervise — e.g., when team briefings/debriefings are held; how engagement partner and manager reviews take place (on-site or off-site); whether EQCR is required.
---
### Factors Considered While Establishing Audit Strategy
Reporting objectives — to plan timing and communications:
- Entity's timetable for reporting
- Meetings with management on nature, timing, extent of audit work
- Expected type and timing of audit reports
- Communications on audit status throughout the engagement
- Team communication plans (meetings, review timings)
Preliminary identification of significant areas — to direct effort:
- Volume of transactions (determines whether to rely on internal controls)
- Significant industry developments (regulatory changes, new reporting requirements)
- Changes in financial reporting framework (e.g., new accounting standards)
- Other legal or environmental changes affecting the entity