Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

Objectives, Purpose, and Investigating Unusual AP Results

## SA 520 — Objectives, Purpose, and Investigating Results

### Objectives of the Auditor Under SA 520

1. To obtain relevant and reliable audit evidence when using Substantive Analytical Procedures (SAP); AND

2. To design and perform AP near the end of the audit that assist the auditor in forming an overall conclusion on whether the financial statements are consistent with the auditor's understanding of the entity.

---

### Purpose of Analytical Procedures

AP use comparisons and relationships to assess whether account balances or other data appear reasonable. Key applications:

AreaWhat AP Can Reveal
Sundry debtorsWhether discrepancy is due to unrecorded debit or unapplied remittance
Sundry creditorsWhether discrepancy arises from uncredited goods received or unrecorded remittance
Inventory (RM/Stores)Excesses or shortages → may indicate misappropriation or premature issue entries
Interest & DividendsReconciling accrued vs. collected amounts → detects adjustment or recording errors
Inter-firm / Intra-firmComparison across entities or time periods for broader insights

---

### Investigating Unusual Results

When AP produce unexpected fluctuations or unusual relationships, the auditor must:

Step 1: Inquire of management and obtain appropriate audit evidence supporting management's explanation.

Step 2: Perform other audit procedures if:

  • Management cannot provide an explanation; OR
  • The explanation, even with corroborating evidence, is not considered adequate

> Critical rule: Management's explanation alone is never sufficient audit evidence. It must be corroborated by independent evidence.

---

### Two Distinct Purposes by Timing

TimingPurpose
Substantive AP (Testing phase)Detect material misstatements in account balances
AP at Completion phaseForm overall conclusion — do FS make sense holistically?

Worked example

### Example 1

AP reveals interest income of ₹1 lakh on FDs worth ₹50 lakhs at 8% rate (expected: ₹4 lakhs). Management explains FDs were encashed mid-year. The auditor must obtain bank statements confirming the encashment date and amounts — management's verbal explanation alone is insufficient audit evidence.

### Example 2

Inventory AP: Opening stock ₹20L + Purchases ₹80L – Closing stock ₹15L = Expected COGS ₹85L. Actual COGS recorded: ₹95L (₹10L unexplained difference). Auditor investigates and discovers theft of inventory by warehouse staff.

### Example 3

Completion phase AP: After all substantive testing, the auditor computes net profit margin as 12% vs. prior year 13%. The small decline is consistent with disclosed raw material price increases. No further action needed — supports unmodified opinion.

### Example 4

AP on payroll: Expected wages = 50 employees × ₹3L average = ₹1.5 crore. Actual wages = ₹2.1 crore (₹60L difference). Management explains 10 new hires mid-year. Auditor verifies through HR records and joining letters — explanation corroborated.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Accepting management's explanation for unusual AP results without independent corroborating evidence
  • Treating 'small but unexplained' differences as immaterial and skipping investigation — any unexplained difference should be assessed relative to performance materiality
  • Confusing the purpose of completion-phase AP (overall conclusion) with substantive AP (detecting specific misstatements) — these are distinct objectives
  • Skipping the formal investigation step when a plausible explanation seems obvious — the auditor must still obtain corroborating evidence
Reference:
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic