## Analytical Procedures (SA 520)
### Definition
Evaluation of financial information through analysis of plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data.
Includes investigation of identified fluctuations or relationships that are:
- Inconsistent with other relevant information, OR
- Differ from expected values by a significant amount
> The definition has two parts: (1) computing the relationship/ratio, and (2) investigating when the result is unexpected. Both are required.
### Three Stages of Use
| Stage | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Planning | Understand the entity; identify areas of higher risk to direct audit procedures |
| As substantive procedures | Reduce detection risk more effectively/efficiently than tests of details for specific assertions |
| Final review | Overall reasonableness check of the FS before forming the audit opinion |
### Factors Affecting Precision of Analytical Procedures
(i.e., how precisely can you predict expected results?)
1. Accuracy with which the expected results of substantive AP can be predicted
2. Disaggregation – the more granular the data, the more precise the expectation (monthly data > annual data; product-level > entity-level)
3. Availability of financial data (budgets, forecasts) and non-financial data (units produced/sold, headcount)
### Factors Affecting Reliability of Data Used in AP
(i.e., can you trust the underlying data?)
1. Source – independent external sources are more reliable than internal data
2. Comparability – broad industry benchmarks may need adjustment for specialized entities
3. Nature and relevance – are budgets set as expected outcomes or aspirational targets?
4. Controls over data preparation – are there controls ensuring completeness, accuracy, and validity of the information?