Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

Financial Leverage – Trading on Equity and Double-Edged Sword

## Financial Leverage as Trading on Equity and Double-Edged Sword

### Financial Leverage as 'Trading on Equity'

Trading on equity = using fixed-cost funds (debentures, preference shares) alongside equity to increase returns to equity shareholders.

How It Works:

1. Company borrows at a fixed cost (interest on debt).

2. If the company earns more than the cost of debt, the surplus goes to equity shareholders.

3. This results in higher EPS.

When Favourable (Positive Leverage):

> Earnings > Cost of Debt → Company has favourable financial leverage → Shareholders get higher returns

When Unfavourable (Negative Leverage):

> Earnings ≤ Cost of Debt → Company has unfavourable financial leverage → EPS falls or becomes negative

---

### Financial Leverage as a 'Double-Edged Sword'

Financial leverage amplifies outcomes in both directions — it can increase gains AND magnify losses.

ROI vs. InterestEffect on EPS & ROEVerdict
ROI > InterestEPS and ROE increaseAdvantageous
ROI < InterestEPS and ROE fall, financial distress possibleHarmful
ROI = InterestNo net benefit or harmNeutral

Key Insight: The same debt that boosts shareholder returns in good times creates a crushing fixed obligation in bad times.

---

### DFL Range Reminder

  • DFL can never be between 0 and 1
  • It is either:
  • ≤ 0 (when EBIT < Interest → negative leverage)
  • = 1 (no fixed financial charges → neutral)
  • ≥ 1 (when EBIT > Interest → positive leverage)

### Summary

```

ROI > Cost of Debt → Trading on equity works → Use leverage

ROI < Cost of Debt → Leverage destroys shareholder value → Avoid excess debt

```

Worked example

### Example 1

Trading on Equity — Good Scenario:

Total Capital = ₹20,00,000: Equity ₹10,00,000 + Debt ₹10,00,000 @ 10% interest.

EBIT = ₹3,00,000 (15% ROI on ₹20,00,000).

Interest = ₹1,00,000. EBT = ₹2,00,000. Tax @30% = ₹60,000. PAT = ₹1,40,000.

ROE = ₹1,40,000 / ₹10,00,000 = 14%.

If all equity was used: PAT on ₹20,00,000 at 15% = ₹3,00,000 → after 30% tax = ₹2,10,000 on ₹20,00,000 equity → ROE = 10.5%.

Debt boosted ROE from 10.5% to 14% → trading on equity worked.

### Example 2

Trading on Equity — Bad Scenario:

Same structure, but EBIT falls to ₹80,000 (4% ROI).

Interest = ₹1,00,000. EBT = –₹20,000 → Loss. EPS becomes negative.

Cost of debt (10%) > ROI (4%) → Financial leverage is harmful → shareholders suffer more than if fully equity-funded.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Assuming 'trading on equity' is always profitable — the entire concept depends on ROI > cost of debt. Below this threshold, it harms shareholders.
  • Thinking DFL can take any value including values between 0 and 1 — it cannot. Watch for MCQ traps on this.
  • Equating 'trading on equity' with equity financing — it is the OPPOSITE: it means using debt/preference (fixed-cost funds) to magnify equity returns.
  • Forgetting the neutral case: when ROI exactly equals interest rate, there is zero net benefit from financial leverage.
Reference:
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic