CA
Tax Tutor
A

Imagine Rajesh is the MD of Rajesh & Co. Pvt. Ltd. He also owns 60% of another company, Sunrise Traders. If Rajesh & Co. buys goods from Sunrise Traders — even at market price — that transaction must be disclosed in the financial statements. Why? Because readers of the accounts need to know that the buyer and seller aren't strangers. That's the entire purpose of AS 18 — Related Party Disclosures: to shine a light on relationships that could influence transactions, so financial statements don't mislead.

Who counts as a Related Party? AS 18 identifies two types of relationships: control and significant influence. Control means one party can govern the financial and operating policies of another (think holding-subsidiary). Significant influence means the power to participate in policy decisions but not control them — typically ownership of 20% or more voting power. The standard then lists specific categories: (1) enterprises that control or are controlled by the reporting enterprise — so parent, subsidiary, and fellow subsidiaries; (2) associates (significant influence relationship); (3) joint ventures; (4) Key Management Personnel (KMP) — directors, MD, whole-time directors, and managers as defined under the Companies Act; (5) relatives of KMP — spouse, children, parents, siblings; and (6) enterprises over which KMP or their relatives exercise significant influence — this catches the classic exam scenario where the MD's wife owns a supplier company.

Now, what needs to be disclosed? First, control relationships must always be disclosed even if there are zero transactions between them — this is a common exam twist. Second, for actual transactions, you must disclose: the nature of the relationship, the nature and amount of the transaction, outstanding balances, and any provisions for doubtful debts. One big relief: transactions between group companies in consolidated financial statements are eliminated anyway, so AS 18 disclosures in CFS focus only on associates, JVs, and KMP. Level IV enterprises (non-corporate, turnover below ₹1 crore) are fully exempt from AS 18. For exam purposes, assume the entity is covered unless told otherwise.

📊 Worked example

Example 1: Identifying and Disclosing a KMP Transaction

Ms. Iyer is the Managing Director of Prestige Ltd. Her husband owns 100% of Iyer Supplies Pvt. Ltd. During FY 2024-25, Prestige Ltd. purchased raw materials worth ₹45,00,000 from Iyer Supplies. At year-end, ₹8,00,000 remains payable.

Is this a related party transaction?

  • Ms. Iyer = KMP of Prestige Ltd. ✓
  • Her husband = relative of KMP ✓
  • Iyer Supplies = enterprise over which a relative of KMP exercises control → Related Party

Disclosure note required in Prestige Ltd.'s financial statements:

| Particulars | Amount |

|---|---|

| Nature of relationship | Enterprise controlled by relative of KMP |

| Name of related party | Iyer Supplies Pvt. Ltd. |

| Nature of transaction | Purchase of raw materials |

| Transaction amount (FY 2024-25) | ₹45,00,000 |

| Outstanding payable as at 31.03.2025 | ₹8,00,000 |

Answer: Both the transaction amount AND the closing balance must be disclosed.

---

Example 2: Control Exists — No Transactions

Mr. Sharma's company, Sharma Holdings Ltd., owns 80% of Metro Textiles Ltd. During FY 2024-25, there were no transactions between the two companies.

Must Metro Textiles disclose this relationship?

Yes — AS 18 explicitly requires disclosure of control relationships regardless of whether any transactions occurred.

Disclosure in Metro Textiles Ltd.'s notes:

> "Sharma Holdings Ltd. holds 80% of the equity share capital of the company and is the holding company. No transactions took place between the two entities during the year."

Answer: Even ₹0 transactions → disclosure mandatory where control exists.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Students think 'related party' only means group companies — Wrong. KMP, their relatives, and enterprises influenced by them are equally covered. Always check all six categories before concluding no related party exists.
  • Skipping disclosure when there are no transactions — Students write 'no disclosure needed since no transactions occurred.' Incorrect. Control relationships must always be disclosed, transaction or not.
  • Forgetting outstanding balances — Students disclose only the transaction amount but omit year-end payables/receivables. AS 18 requires both the transaction value AND outstanding balances.
  • Assuming consolidated financial statements need full AS 18 disclosures — In CFS, intra-group transactions are already eliminated; disclosures are needed only for associates, JVs, and KMP, not fellow subsidiaries or parent-subsidiary.
  • Confusing 'relative' scope — Students either include everyone (cousins, in-laws) or miss someone. Under AS 18, relatives of KMP means: spouse, son, daughter, father, mother, brother, and sister — memorise this list as it appears in exam scenarios.
📖 Reference: AS 18 — Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
Test yourself
Practice questions on this section, AI-graded with citations.
⚡ Practice now →