Worked Solution
✓ VerifiedPart (a): Research and Development Expenses — K Ltd. (AS-26)
Applicable Standard: AS-26 (Intangible Assets) governs the treatment of research and development expenditure under Indian GAAP for CA Intermediate.
Under AS-26, all research phase expenditure must be recognised as an expense in the period it is incurred and cannot be deferred or capitalised. Development phase expenditure may be capitalised as an intangible asset only if all of the following criteria are simultaneously satisfied:
1. Technical feasibility of completing the asset so it will be available for use or sale.
2. Intention to complete and use or sell it.
3. Ability to use or sell the asset.
4. Probability that the asset will generate future economic benefits.
5. Availability of adequate technical, financial and other resources.
6. Ability to reliably measure the expenditure.
In the present case, the Management of K Ltd. has itself concluded that product X cannot be manufactured and sold for the next 10 years. This clearly means the criteria of technical feasibility, intention to complete, and probability of future economic benefits are NOT met. Therefore, the expenditure of ₹40 lakhs does NOT qualify for capitalisation or deferral.
Advice: The entire ₹40 lakhs incurred upto 31st March 2024 must be written off as an expense in the Profit & Loss Account for the year ended 31st March 2024. The Management's proposal to defer the write-off to future years is not permissible under AS-26. Deferral is only possible if the recognition criteria are met; since they are not, the expenditure must be expensed immediately.
---
Part (b): Normal and Abnormal Wastage — Wooden Plywood Limited (AS-2)
Applicable Standard: AS-2 (Valuation of Inventories) governs the treatment of production losses.
(1) Calculation of Abnormal Loss:
- Normal wastage = 5% × 16,000 MT = 800 MT
- Actual wastage = 950 MT
- Abnormal loss = 950 − 800 = 150 MT
Under AS-2, the cost of normal loss is absorbed into the cost of good output. Therefore, the effective cost per unit of output is calculated after absorbing normal loss:
- Total raw material cost = 16,000 × ₹190 = ₹30,40,000
- Expected good output (after normal loss) = 16,000 − 800 = 15,200 MT
- Cost per MT of output = ₹30,40,000 ÷ 15,200 = ₹200 per MT
- Amount of Abnormal Loss = 150 MT × ₹200 = ₹30,000
(2) Treatment under AS-2:
- Normal Loss (800 MT): The cost of normal/expected wastage is included in the cost of production. It is spread over the cost of good output, increasing the cost per unit from ₹190 to ₹200 per MT. Normal loss does not receive any separate valuation in inventory.
- Abnormal Loss (150 MT — ₹30,000): This represents loss in excess of normal expectations and is not included in the cost of inventories. It must be charged to the Profit & Loss Account as a period cost. Including it in inventory cost would overstate asset values with costs that do not represent probable future benefits.
---
Part (c): Reclassification of Investments — Y Limited (AS-13 Revised)
Applicable Standard: AS-13 (Accounting for Investments) — Revised governs reclassification.
(1) Long-term Investment reclassified as Current Investment:
- Original cost = ₹14 lakhs; Written down by ₹2 lakhs (for other than temporary decline)
- Carrying amount as at reclassification = ₹12 lakhs
- Market value on 15th June 2024 = ₹11 lakhs
As per AS-13, when long-term investments are reclassified as current investments, the transfer is made at the lower of carrying amount and market/fair value at the date of transfer.
- Lower of ₹12 lakhs and ₹11 lakhs = ₹11 lakhs
- Transfer amount = ₹11 lakhs
- The shortfall of ₹1 lakh (₹12 − ₹11) is charged to the Profit & Loss Account.
(2) Current Investment reclassified as Long-term Investment:
- Cost of current investment = ₹7 lakhs
- Market value on 31st March 2024 = ₹6 lakhs → Carrying value in books = ₹6 lakhs (lower of cost and fair value, as required for current investments)
- Fair value on 15th June 2024 (reclassification date) = ₹8.5 lakhs
As per AS-13, when current investments are reclassified as long-term investments, the transfer is made at the lower of cost and fair value at the date of transfer.
- Lower of ₹7 lakhs (cost) and ₹8.5 lakhs (fair value) = ₹7 lakhs
- Transfer amount = ₹7 lakhs
- The provision of ₹1 lakh (₹7 − ₹6) previously created when carrying at lower of cost/market is reversed through Profit & Loss Account before reclassification.
Write it like this
1The skeleton
- Name the AS in line 1 of each sub-part — write 'As per AS-26 / AS-2 / AS-13' before anything else; examiners tick the standard citation first before reading your rule or calculation.
- For Part (a), list the 6 AS-26 criteria then immediately use the management's own words against them — the phrase 'cannot be manufactured and sold for 10 years' is your weapon to knock out feasibility, intention, and future benefits in one shot; don't just recite the list and leave the application vague.
- For Part (b), show the cost absorption step explicitly — write 'Cost per MT = ₹30,40,000 ÷ 15,200 = ₹200' as a visible working line; jumping straight to abnormal loss amount without this step loses the method marks even if the final number is right.
- For Part (c), state the transfer rule as a formula before the numbers — write 'transfer at lower of carrying amount and market value' / 'lower of cost and fair value' first, then plug in figures; examiners award a mark for the rule statement itself, separate from the arithmetic.
- In Part (c), explicitly handle the provision reversal for Current→Long-term — state that the ₹1 lakh provision created earlier is reversed through P&L before the transfer is recorded; this is the second-half mark most students drop while getting the ₹7 lakh transfer amount right.
- End each sub-part with a one-line treatment verdict — 'charged to Profit & Loss Account' / 'included in cost of inventories' / 'written off immediately'; examiners look for this conclusion line to award the final mark of each part.
2Examiner-rewarded phrases
3Common trap
Heads up — in Part (c), nearly everyone correctly calculates the ₹11 lakh transfer for LT→Current but completely forgets to reverse the ₹1 lakh provision when doing Current→LT; both the transfer value AND the provision reversal carry separate marks, so missing the reversal silently costs you without you realising it. Also in Part (a), don't just list all 6 AS-26 criteria mechanically — you must explicitly state which specific criteria fail because of the management's own 10-year conclusion, otherwise examiners treat it as rote reproduction and cut marks.