Official Suggested Answer
As per AS 9 "Revenue Recognition", in a transaction involving the sale of goods, performance should be regarded as being achieved when the following conditions are fulfilled:
(i) the seller of goods has transferred to the buyer the property in the goods for a price or all significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer and the seller retains no effective control of the goods transferred to a degree usually associated with ownership; and
(ii) no significant uncertainty exists regarding the amount of the consideration that will be derived from the sale of the goods.
(i) Trade discounts given should be deducted in determining revenue. Thus 12% should be deducted from the amount of turnover for the purpose of recognition of revenue.
The adjustment of sale figure to the extent of discount is correct as per AS 9 'Revenue Recognition'.
(ii) Dividends from investments in securities are not recognized in the statement of profit and loss until a right to receive payment is established. In the given situation, the dividend is proposed on 30th March, 2025, while it is declared on 30th April, 2025. Thus, the right to receive the payment of dividend gets established on 30th April, 2025.
The recognition of ₹ 10 lakhs on accrual basis in the end of the financial year 31st March, 2025 is not correct as per AS 9 'Revenue Recognition'.
(iii) In case of goods sold on approval basis, revenue should not be recognized until the goods have been formally accepted by the buyer or the buyer has done an act adopting the transaction or the time period for rejection has elapsed or where no time has been fixed, a reasonable time has elapsed.
Therefore, revenue should be recognized for the ₹ 90,000 upon receipt of approval on 31st January, 2025 and for the balance ₹ 60,000 on 15th March, 2025 as the time period for rejecting the goods had expired.
(iv) 20,000 goods lying unsold with consignee should be treated as closing inventory and sales should be recognized for ₹ 60,000. In case of consignment sale revenue should not be recognized until the goods are sold to a third party.
The recognition of ₹ 60,000 revenues in the book for the year 2024-25 is correct as per AS 9 'Revenue Recognition'.
Source: ICAI Board of Studies. open source PDF ↗
Worked Solution
✓ VerifiedThis question is governed by AS 22 – Accounting for Taxes on Income (Accounting Standard 22, issued by ICAI). The core concept is that when depreciation charged for accounting purposes (SLM) differs from tax-allowable depreciation, a timing difference arises, resulting in either a Deferred Tax Liability (DTL) or Deferred Tax Asset (DTA).
Step 1 – Book Depreciation (SLM): Annual depreciation = ₹2,00,000 ÷ 4 = ₹50,000 per year for all four years.
Step 2 – Tax Depreciation: Year 1 (2021-22): 50% × ₹2,00,000 = ₹1,00,000. Year 2 (2022-23): Balance = ₹2,00,000 − ₹1,00,000 = ₹1,00,000. Years 3 & 4: NIL (fully depreciated for tax).
Step 3 – Timing Differences and DTL/DTA Computation:
| Year | Book Dep (₹) | Tax Dep (₹) | Timing Diff (₹) | Nature | DTL/(DTA) for year (₹) | Cumulative DTL (₹) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | 50,000 | 1,00,000 | (50,000) | DTL created | 50,000 × 30% = 15,000 | 15,000 |
| 2022-23 | 50,000 | 1,00,000 | (50,000) | DTL created | 50,000 × 30% = 15,000 | 30,000 |
| 2023-24 | 50,000 | NIL | 50,000 | DTL reversed | 50,000 × 30% = (15,000) | 15,000 |
| 2024-25 | 50,000 | NIL | 50,000 | DTL reversed | 50,000 × 30% = (15,000) | NIL |
When Tax Dep > Book Dep: taxable income < accounting income → tax paid currently is less → DTL created (future tax obligation).
When Book Dep > Tax Dep: taxable income > accounting income → tax paid currently is more → DTL reversed (past obligation settled).
Note on Current Tax and Tax Expense: Since Profit Before Depreciation and Tax (PBDT) is not provided in the question, individual figures for Current Tax (= Taxable Profit × 30%) and Tax Expense (= Accounting Profit × 30%) cannot be computed. However, the relationship holds as: Tax Expense = Current Tax + Deferred Tax (for the year).
Step 4 – Tax Adjustment Account (Deferred Tax Liability Account):
Dr. Deferred Tax Liability Account Cr.
| Date | Particulars | ₹ | Date | Particulars | ₹ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31.03.2023 | Balance c/d | 30,000 | 31.03.2022 | P&L A/c (DTL created) | 15,000 |
| 31.03.2023 | P&L A/c (DTL created) | 15,000 | |||
| 30,000 | 30,000 | ||||
| 31.03.2024 | P&L A/c (reversed) | 15,000 | 01.04.2023 | Balance b/d | 30,000 |
| 31.03.2024 | Balance c/d | 15,000 | |||
| 30,000 | 30,000 | ||||
| 31.03.2025 | P&L A/c (reversed) | 15,000 | 01.04.2024 | Balance b/d | 15,000 |
| 31.03.2025 | Balance c/d | NIL | |||
| 15,000 | 15,000 |
Conclusion: The total DTL created over Years 1 & 2 = ₹30,000, fully reversed by 31st March 2025 (end of Year 4), leaving zero balance — confirming that all timing differences self-reverse over the asset's life, consistent with AS 22.
Write it like this
1The skeleton
- Name AS 22 in line 1 — write 'As per AS 22 – Accounting for Taxes on Income' before anything else; examiners are trained to tick the standard reference first, so burying it costs you easy marks.
- Build the depreciation comparison table first — lay out Book Dep vs Tax Dep vs Timing Difference in a columnar format; this single table earns you 2–3 marks on its own because it shows your working transparently.
- Label the nature of each timing difference explicitly — write 'DTL created' or 'DTL reversed' in a separate column; don't make the examiner infer it, because unsigned numbers in a table are ambiguous and risky.
- Multiply timing difference × tax rate in a visible step — show '₹50,000 × 30% = ₹15,000' inline; skipping this step looks like you guessed the answer even if it's correct.
- Draw the ledger account with proper Dr/Cr sides and dates — the question says 'Prepare the Tax Adjustment Account', so a T-account with Balance b/d, P&L A/c entries, and Balance c/d is non-negotiable; a narrative answer here scores zero for format.
- Close with one line confirming self-reversal — state 'Cumulative DTL as on 31.03.2025 = NIL, confirming all timing differences have reversed over the asset's life'; this shows conceptual closure and examiners reward it.',
2Examiner-rewarded phrases
3Common trap
Most students flip the DTL/DTA label in Years 3 and 4 — when tax dep becomes NIL, taxable income exceeds book income, so you're *paying more tax now than your expense*, which reverses the DTL (not creates a DTA). Writing 'DTA created in Year 3' is a conceptual error that kills 2 marks even if your numbers are right.