Worked Solution
✓ VerifiedAnswer: (B)
Under AS 9 (Revenue Recognition), revenue should be recognized when risks and rewards of ownership pass to the buyer and the performance obligation is satisfied.
Identification of Performance Obligations:
1. Sale of equipment (separate from installation component)
2. Installation service (₹1,000 per AC)
3. Warranty is an assurance-type warranty satisfied at point of sale (not a separate obligation)
Revenue Recognition as on March 31, 2024:
By March 31, 2024:
- Equipment was delivered on March 27, 2024 → risks and rewards transferred
- Installation was completed on April 5, 2024 → obligation NOT yet satisfied
Calculation:
- Gross selling price per AC: ₹45,000
- Less: Trade discount per AC: ₹500
- Net selling price per AC: ₹44,500
This net amount must be allocated between equipment and installation:
- Equipment portion (before discount): ₹44,000 per AC
- Installation portion (before discount): ₹1,000 per AC
- Total: ₹45,000
Equipment revenue allocation:
- Net consideration × (Equipment proportion) = ₹44,500 × (44,000 ÷ 45,000)
- Per AC: ₹43,500
- For 5 ACs: ₹43,500 × 5 = ₹2,17,500
Installation revenue: ₹0 (not yet completed by March 31)
Total Revenue Recognized: ₹2,17,500
Write it like this
1The skeleton
- Split the transaction first — identify delivery vs. installation as two separate obligations before touching any numbers, because AS 9 treats each performance separately and examiners look for this split upfront.
- Apply trade discount before you allocate — reduce ₹45,000 to ₹44,500 net per AC first, then split proportionally (44,000:1,000 ratio), not the other way around; reversing this order loses you the calculation mark.
- Date-gate each obligation — equipment delivered March 27 ✓ (risks & rewards transferred), installation completed April 5 ✗ (after year-end), so installation revenue = ₹0 as on March 31, 2024.
2Examiner-rewarded phrases
3Common trap
The most common slip here is just deducting ₹1,000 flat for installation and recognising ₹43,500 × 5 — but you haven't proportionally allocated the trade discount, so the split is wrong and you lose the mark even if your final number looks close. Always allocate the net price in the ratio of component prices.