Worked Solution
✓ VerifiedExchange Difference — Computation and Treatment under AS 11 (Para 46A)
Om Ltd. has exercised the option available under Para 46A of AS 11 (The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates) to adjust exchange differences arising on foreign currency loans to the cost of the related asset (PPE), instead of charging them to profit or loss. Therefore, the treatment of including the exchange loss in 'Cost of Goods Sold' adopted by Om Ltd. is incorrect and needs to be rectified.
Exchange Loss Computation (Year ended 31.03.2020):
The foreign currency loan of US$ 50 lakh was taken at ₹60 per US$. By 31.03.2020, the rate moved to ₹62 per US$, resulting in exchange loss in two parts:
(i) Exchange loss on repayment of first instalment (US$ 10 lakh): The instalment was recorded at ₹60 but paid at ₹62, giving a loss of ₹20 lakh.
(ii) Exchange loss on restatement of outstanding loan (US$ 40 lakh): The remaining loan is restated from ₹60 to ₹62 per US$, giving a loss of ₹80 lakh.
Total Exchange Loss = ₹100 lakh
Correct Treatment: Since Om Ltd. has exercised the Para 46A option, the total exchange loss of ₹100 lakh must be capitalised — i.e., added to the carrying cost of the PPE. It should NOT be charged to cost of goods sold.
Depreciation Calculation:
The adjusted cost of the PPE becomes ₹3,000 lakh + ₹100 lakh = ₹3,100 lakh. Depreciation at 20% on WDV basis for the year 2019-20 is computed on this revised cost.
Depreciation for year ended 31.03.2020 = ₹620 lakh
Write it like this
1The skeleton
- Name Para 46A of AS 11 in your first line — examiners are scanning for the standard reference immediately; burying it costs you presentation marks even if your numbers are right.
- Split the exchange loss into two parts explicitly — repayment loss (US$ 10L × ₹2) and restatement loss (US$ 40L × ₹2) in a two-row table or labeled sub-points, because the examiner gives step marks for each component separately.
- Call out Om Ltd.'s wrong treatment before giving the right one — one sentence saying 'inclusion in cost of goods sold is incorrect' signals you understand the conceptual error, which is worth its own mark in application questions.
- State the capitalisation rule as a positive conclusion — write 'exchange loss of ₹100 lakh shall be added to the cost of PPE' rather than just showing the arithmetic; examiners reward the rule-application sentence.
- Build depreciation on the revised cost explicitly — show ₹3,000L + ₹100L = ₹3,100L as a visible step before applying 20% WDV; if you jump straight to ₹620L without showing the base, you risk losing a step mark.
2Examiner-rewarded phrases
3Common trap
Watch out — most students compute only the repayment loss (US$ 10L) and forget to restate the remaining outstanding loan (US$ 40L). You'll get ₹20L instead of ₹100L and your depreciation base will be wrong, costing you 3+ marks in one shot.