Worked Solution
✓ VerifiedAS 7 (Revised) — Construction Contracts requires that when the outcome of a construction contract can be estimated reliably, contract revenue and contract costs shall be recognised by reference to the stage of completion of the contract activity at the reporting date.
Step 1 — Determine Total Estimated Cost
Cost already incurred = ₹1,80,00,000; Estimated additional cost = ₹1,40,00,000; Total estimated cost = ₹3,20,00,000.
Step 2 — Check for Foreseeable Loss
Total estimated cost (₹3,20,00,000) exceeds contract price (₹3,00,00,000). Therefore, there is a foreseeable loss of ₹20,00,000. As per AS 7 (Revised), the entire foreseeable loss must be recognised immediately as an expense, irrespective of stage of completion.
Step 3 — Stage of Completion (Cost-to-Cost Method)
Stage of completion = Cost incurred to date ÷ Total estimated cost = ₹1,80,00,000 ÷ ₹3,20,00,000 = 56.25%
Step 4 — Revenue to be Recognised
Contract revenue = ₹3,00,00,000 × 56.25% = ₹1,68,75,000
Step 5 — Cost to be Recognised (Amount Charged to Revenue)
Cost recognised via stage of completion = 56.25% × ₹3,20,00,000 = ₹1,80,00,000. Loss already embedded in the above = ₹1,80,00,000 − ₹1,68,75,000 = ₹11,25,000. Remaining foreseeable loss to be additionally charged = ₹20,00,000 − ₹11,25,000 = ₹8,75,000.
Total amount charged to revenue (P&L) = ₹1,80,00,000 + ₹8,75,000 = ₹1,88,75,000
This ensures the net loss for the year = ₹1,88,75,000 − ₹1,68,75,000 = ₹20,00,000, i.e., the entire foreseeable loss is recognised in the year ended 31st March, 2012, as mandated by AS 7 (Revised).
Write it like this
1The skeleton
- Start by computing total estimated cost and immediately comparing it to contract price — this single comparison tells you whether you're in a profit contract or a loss contract, and the entire answer structure changes based on it.
- Explicitly state the foreseeable loss (₹20 lakh) and cite the AS 7 rule in one line — 'since total estimated cost exceeds contract price, the entire foreseeable loss of ₹20,00,000 must be recognised immediately' — examiners award a dedicated mark just for identifying and stating this rule.
- Show stage of completion as a fraction with labels — write '₹1,80,00,000 ÷ ₹3,20,00,000 = 56.25%' on its own line; don't bury it inside a paragraph or the examiner misses your working.
- Calculate revenue recognised (₹1,68,75,000) as a separate numbered step — even though the question only asks for cost charged, showing revenue proves you used the percentage-of-completion method correctly and sets up your reconciliation.
- Arrive at total cost charged by adding the 'remaining foreseeable loss' to proportionate cost — show ₹1,80,00,000 + ₹8,75,000 = ₹1,88,75,000, then verify: revenue minus cost equals the full ₹20 lakh loss; this reconciliation line is what separates a 4/5 from a 5/5.
2Examiner-rewarded phrases
3Common trap
Most students stop at ₹1,80,00,000 (costs incurred to date) and call it 'cost charged to revenue' — that's wrong because it only captures the proportionate loss already embedded in those costs, not the full foreseeable loss AS 7 demands. You MUST add the residual ₹8,75,000 to hit ₹1,88,75,000, and if you skip the reconciliation check, you won't even realise you missed it.