Worked Solution
✓ VerifiedAS 9 Revenue Recognition requires:
Under AS 9, revenue from sale of goods shall be recognized when: (a) significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer; (b) the seller has no continuing managerial involvement or effective control; (c) revenue can be reliably measured; and (d) it is probable that economic benefits will flow to the entity.
Analysis of Raj Ltd.'s Treatment:
Raj Ltd.'s accounting is INCORRECT and does not comply with AS 9. The ₹15,00,000 recorded as sales is premature and unjustified. Here's why:
First, the ₹15,00,000 recognized as Sales is improper: The goods worth ₹15,00,000 remain with Raj Ltd. as "ready for dispatch." Since the buyer (Heena Ltd.) has REFUSED acceptance and the goods have not been delivered to the buyer, the significant risks and rewards of ownership have NOT transferred. Revenue cannot be recognized merely because goods are ready for dispatch. Per AS 9, physical dispatch of goods coupled with acceptance by the buyer is essential for revenue recognition.
Second, there is no reasonable certainty of realization: The buyer has explicitly refused to accept goods from month 4 onwards, creating uncertainty about ultimate cash realization. This breach of contract or suspension creates a contingency. AS 9 requires reasonable certainty of ultimate realization in cash or cash equivalents. The buyer's refusal negates this certainty for the undisputed goods.
Third, the accounting conflates payment received with delivery accepted: The ₹30,00,000 advance should be matched ONLY with goods actually delivered and accepted by the buyer. For months 1 and 2, if goods were delivered and accepted, revenue of ₹30,00,000 could have been recognized against this advance. The goods dispatched in month 3 (if any) that were rejected, and the ₹15,00,000 yet to be dispatched, must NOT be recognized as revenue.
Correct Treatment under AS 9:
1. Revenue should be recognized only for goods delivered and accepted: If goods worth ₹30,00,000 (months 1–2) were delivered and accepted by Heena Ltd., this amount should be recognized as revenue and the advance matched against it.
2. Rejected/on-hold goods should NOT be recognized as sales: The goods worth ₹15,00,000 (month 3 onwards) that were refused or remain on hold should NOT be included in sales revenue. These goods remain the asset of Raj Ltd.
3. Treatment of unmatched advance: Any portion of the ₹30,00,000 advance that exceeds accepted goods should continue to be shown as "Advance received against sales" (a liability), not reclassified based on goods merely ready for dispatch.
4. Subsequent resolution: Once the dispute is resolved—either the buyer accepts the goods or the contract is cancelled—appropriate adjustments should be made. If the buyer ultimately refuses, the goods should be adjusted as returned inventory, and the advance should be refunded or adjusted accordingly.
Conclusion: Raj Ltd.'s accounting is incorrect. It violates the fundamental principle of AS 9 by recognizing revenue before significant risks and rewards transfer and without reasonable certainty of realization.
Write it like this
1The skeleton
- Lead with AS 9's four conditions for revenue recognition — don't start with the story; state the law first so the examiner knows you know where you're going.
- Pin the exact violation: 'significant risks and rewards have NOT transferred' — use this phrase verbatim because examiners tick it specifically; 'goods ready for dispatch' is NOT a transfer.
- Call out the buyer's refusal as the deal-breaker — Heena Ltd. refusing acceptance means no delivery, no economic benefit inflow, so both AS 9 triggers fail simultaneously; say both, don't just say one.
- Address the ₹30,00,000 advance correctly — distinguish what portion is legitimately earned (months where goods were accepted) vs. what must stay as 'Advance received against Sales'; this is where marks hide.
- End with a crisp one-line verdict: 'Treatment by Raj Ltd. is incorrect and not in accordance with AS 9' — examiners want a conclusion sentence, not just analysis hanging in the air.
2Examiner-rewarded phrases
3Common trap
Watch out — most students write 'goods are ready for dispatch so revenue can be recognised' and actually argue FOR Raj Ltd. The trap is confusing receipt of payment with transfer of risks and rewards. Payment received ≠ revenue earned under AS 9; goods must be dispatched AND accepted.