💡 Show solution AI SOLUTION
Treatment under AS-29 (Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets)
(i) Provision for Replacement of Furnace Lining
Alloy Fabrication Limited should NOT create a provision for the replacement of the furnace lining under AS-29. The reason is that a provision is recognised only when a present obligation exists as a result of a past event, an outflow of resources is probable, and a reliable estimate can be made.
In this case, the future replacement cost does not constitute a present obligation — the company can avoid the expenditure by selling the furnace or ceasing operations. There is no obligating event that has already occurred compelling the company to incur this cost. Since there is no present obligation, the conditions under AS-29 for recognition of a provision are not met.
However, as per AS-10 (Property, Plant and Equipment), the furnace lining should have been recognised as a separate component of the furnace at the time of installation (1st April 2019). This component should be depreciated over its useful life of 5 years. At 31st March 2022, three years of depreciation on the lining component should have been charged to the Profit & Loss Account. The company should ensure this component accounting is correctly applied rather than making an AS-29 provision.
(ii) Consumer Court Penalty of ₹ 50 Lakhs and Legal Fees of ₹ 5 Lakhs
Regarding the penalty (₹ 50 Lakhs):
There is a 70% chance that the penalty will NOT be levied, which means there is only a 30% probability that the penalty will be imposed. Under AS-29, a provision is recognised only when an outflow of resources is probable (i.e., more than 50% likely). Since the probability of the penalty being levied is only 30% (less than 50%), it does not meet the threshold of 'probable'.
Therefore, no provision should be created for ₹ 50 Lakhs. However, since the possibility is not remote (30% is a material possibility), the amount should be disclosed as a Contingent Liability in the Notes to Accounts, along with the nature of the contingency, an estimate of its financial effect, and the uncertainties relating to the outflow.
Regarding the legal fees (₹ 5 Lakhs):
The company has a contractual obligation to pay legal fees of ₹ 5 Lakhs to the lawyer, irrespective of the outcome of the case. This is a present obligation arising from a past event (appointment of the lawyer and services being rendered).
- ₹ 3 Lakhs (60%) already paid in advance should be recognised as an expense in the Profit & Loss Account to the extent services have been rendered.
- ₹ 2 Lakhs (40%) payable after finalisation of the case meets all three criteria under AS-29: present obligation, probable outflow, and reliable estimate. Therefore, a provision of ₹ 2 Lakhs must be recognised in the financial statements as on 31st March 2022.
Conclusion: No provision for lining replacement or the ₹ 50 Lakh penalty; contingent liability disclosure required for the penalty; provision of ₹ 2 Lakhs to be made for unpaid legal fees.