Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

Re-opening of Accounts on Court's or Tribunal's Orders (Section 130)

# Re-opening of Accounts on Court's or Tribunal's Orders — Section 130

## 1. Bar on Voluntary Reopening

A company cannot re-open its Books of Account or recast its FS voluntarily. Reopening is permitted only upon an order of a Court or NCLT.

## 2. Who may apply

An application for reopening can be made by:

  • Central Government
  • Income Tax authorities
  • SEBI
  • Any other statutory regulatory body or authority
  • Any other concerned person

## 3. Grounds on which order may be passed

The Court/NCLT may order reopening if it is satisfied that:

  • The earlier accounts were prepared in a fraudulent manner, OR
  • The affairs of the company were mismanaged, casting a doubt on the reliability of the FS.

## 4. Procedural Safeguard — Notice & Representation

Before passing the order, the Court/NCLT must give notice to the CG, IT authority, SEBI, statutory regulatory body and the concerned person and take their representations into consideration.

## 5. Time Limit

  • Order can relate only to 8 FYs immediately preceding the current FY.
  • Exception: If CG has directed maintenance of BOA for a longer period under Sec 128(5), accounts of that longer period can also be re-opened.

## 6. Finality

The revised or re-casted accounts are final.

Worked example

### Example 1

Example — 8-Year Bar: In FY 2025-26, SEBI files an application with NCLT to reopen C Ltd.'s accounts of FY 2013-14. Since 2013-14 falls beyond the 8-year window (only FYs 2017-18 to 2024-25 are within reach), NCLT cannot allow the reopening — even if fraud or mismanagement is suspected.

### Example 2

Example — Longer period: If CG had directed M Ltd. to maintain its BOA for 12 years under Section 128(5), reopening can extend to that longer period and is not capped at 8 years.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Thinking the company itself can voluntarily reopen — only a Court/NCLT order on application by listed authorities is permitted.
  • Forgetting the 8-year ceiling — counted from the current FY, not from the application date.
  • Overlooking the procedural requirement of notice/representation to CG, IT, SEBI and statutory regulators before passing the order.
  • Confusing this with Section 131 (voluntary revision) — Section 130 is involuntary reopening; Section 131 is voluntary revision.
Bare-Act text Section 130 · Companies Act, 2013 · click to expand
Section 130 — Re-opening of accounts on court's or Tribunal's orders: A company shall not re-open its books of account and not recast its financial statements unless an application in this regard is made by the Central Government, Income Tax authorities, SEBI, any other statutory regulatory body or authority or any concerned person and an order is made by a court of competent jurisdiction or the Tribunal to the effect that the relevant earlier accounts were prepared in a fraudulent manner or the affairs of the company were mismanaged during the relevant period casting doubt on the reliability of the FS. The court/Tribunal shall give notice to the CG, IT authorities, SEBI or any other statutory regulatory body or authority and the concerned parties and shall take into consideration the representations made by them. No order shall be made in respect of re-opening of books of account relating to a period earlier than eight FYs immediately preceding the current FY, unless a longer-period direction has been issued under Section 128(5).
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic