## Limitations of Internal Control
Internal control, however well-designed, can only provide reasonable assurance — not absolute assurance — about the achievement of financial reporting objectives. This is because of inherent limitations.
### Six Inherent Limitations
#### i) Provides Only Reasonable Assurance
- Internal control gives reasonable (not absolute) assurance about financial reporting objectives.
- Reason: Inherent limitations prevent IC from providing absolute assurance.
#### ii) Lack of Understanding of Purpose
- Individuals responsible for reviewing information may not understand the purpose of the control.
- Consequence: They fail to take appropriate action even when a control exception is noted.
#### iii) Collusion
- Two or more employees can collude to override controls.
- Example: An edit check in the system is deliberately disabled by colluding employees.
- No control system can fully prevent determined collusion.
#### iv) Limitations in Smaller Entities
- In small businesses, segregation of duties is often not practicable (too few staff).
- The owner-manager has more control over the business but is also in a position to override controls.
#### v) Faulty Human Judgement in Decision-Making
- Controls often depend on human judgement at the design stage.
- A poorly designed control may fail to catch errors even when properly operated.
- Human decisions are inherently fallible.
#### vi) Management Override of Controls
- Management can override controls that have been properly implemented.
- Even well-designed controls are vulnerable when management circumvents them.
- This is one reason auditors perform unpredictability in audit procedures.
### Summary Table
| # | Limitation | Key Word |
|---|---|---|
| i | Only reasonable assurance | Inherent Limitation |
| ii | Lack of understanding | Ignorance / Inaction |
| iii | Collusion | Override by employees |
| iv | Smaller entities | No segregation of duties |
| v | Faulty judgement | Design error |
| vi | Management override | Implementation bypass |