Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

Risk Assessment Procedures – Analytical Procedures (SA 315 & SA 520)

## Risk Assessment Procedures: Analytical Procedures (SA 315 / SA 520)

### What Are Analytical Procedures?

Analytical procedures involve evaluating financial information through analysis of plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data, and investigating identified fluctuations or relationships that are inconsistent with other relevant information.

---

### Where Are They Used?

StageStandard
Risk Assessment (planning stage)SA 315
Further Audit Procedures (substantive testing)SA 520
Near completion (overall review at reporting end)SA 520

---

### Purpose During Risk Assessment (SA 315)

Analytical procedures at this stage:

  • Can reveal unknown aspects of the entity
  • Help assess ROMM (Risk of Material Misstatement) for designing further audit procedures
  • May involve both financial and non-financial data
  • Can highlight unusual transactions, events, or trends with potential audit implications
  • Provide a broad indication of potential material misstatements
  • Combined with other gathered information → help auditor understand and evaluate ROMM

---

### How It Works — The Rent Example

> Entity pays rent of ₹50,000 per month.

> Auditor tested supporting documents → all in order.

> Auditor then compared with industry average → industry pays only ₹10,000 p.m.

> Result: Significant unexplained difference → potential ROMM → requires further investigation.

This is a classic analytical procedure: even though documents were clean, the relationship to external data flagged a risk.

Worked example

### Example 1

Revenue vs. Industry Growth: Entity reports 40% revenue growth while the industry grew at 5%. Auditor flags this as an unusual trend → potential overstatement of revenue → ROMM identified at risk assessment stage.

### Example 2

Non-financial correlation: Entity reports 1,000 units produced but headcount in production fell 50% with no change in machinery. Non-financial data (headcount) is inconsistent with financial data (production volume) → possible misstatement in inventory or cost of production.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Confusing the purpose of analytical procedures at the risk assessment stage (to identify ROMM areas) with their purpose under SA 520 (to obtain substantive audit evidence) — they are used differently.
  • Thinking analytical procedures only involve financial data — non-financial data (units produced, number of employees, square footage) are equally valid inputs.
  • Treating a clean set of supporting documents as sufficient — the rent example shows that document testing alone missed the anomaly; comparison with external benchmarks was essential.
Reference: SA 315 – Risk Assessment Procedures; SA 520 – Analytical Procedures (further audit procedures and overall review) — SA 315 / SA 520
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic